Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a RetraxPro XR for my 2019 Sierra 1500 Standard Bed and like it but I'm going to sell it and get a shell for the dog and kid gear.  

 

Let me know if anyone is interested in a RetraxPro XR in great condition, I'll make you a great deal.  I have the Yakima bars that go on top if interested!

Posted
On 8/11/2019 at 6:32 PM, Wheelguy said:

Does the Undercover Ultra Flex rail clear the folding assist handle in the bed of the Sierras with  MultiPro tailgate? Would appreciate anyone that has one posting some pics with the tailgate down showing their rail clamp location along the driver side close to the tailgate and around the assist handle.

Anyone?  Thanks!

Posted

I've been a big fan of Truxedo in the past, specifically the Lo Pro. But I'm trying to save some money this time around, so I ordered the Gator ETX from Amazon based on some feedback I've seen on this forum (and the fact that it looks exactly like a Truxedo in pictures). Unfortunately, they sent me the wrong one, so I'm in the process of getting it replaced. It did lead to an interesting finding though. I called Gator support and they needed me to send them some info, and the email address they gave me was a Truxedo address. Based on that and the looks, build, etc, I'd say that Gator seems like it's just a re-branded Truxedo. The one I'm sending back looks good, and seems like the quality will be just fine when I get the right one installed.

Posted

I went and actually checked out a showroom today that had 9 different covers on display.   If you haven't checked out the Retrax line, I highly suggest it.  They are BY FAR the most expensive but they are without a doubt made better, offer a lifetime warranty and they just work really well!   If you are buying a $40-70k truck I can't understand why you would skimp and put a $200 cover on it!   

Posted
On 8/11/2019 at 3:32 PM, Wheelguy said:

Does the Undercover Ultra Flex rail clear the folding assist handle in the bed of the Sierras with  MultiPro tailgate? Would appreciate anyone that has one posting some pics with the tailgate down showing their rail clamp location along the driver side close to the tailgate and around the assist handle.

I'm having mine installed right now at Bedliners Plus in Irvine. The undercover ultra does fit with the handle. The handle has to be removed for the install and the rail is notched so that when the handle is reinstalled, everything works as expected. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Smrtasp said:

I'm having mine installed right now at Bedliners Plus in Irvine. The undercover ultra does fit with the handle. The handle has to be removed for the install and the rail is notched so that when the handle is reinstalled, everything works as expected. 

Thanks for the info - appreciate it.  If you get a chance before this evening, take some pics with the tailgate down near the handle & post them.  Just interested where the clamp near the tailgate will go.

Edited by Wheelguy
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Smrtasp said:

I'm having mine installed right now at Bedliners Plus in Irvine. The undercover ultra does fit with the handle. The handle has to be removed for the install and the rail is notched so that when the handle is reinstalled, everything works as expected. 

Just went over the install and there was an adjustment needed for the handle. The cover came with a bracket meant to mount in the corner where the handle is currently installed. The handle is supposed to be removed and the bracket installed then the handle mounts back on top of the bracket. The problem is that the bolts are factory mounted inside the bed and aren't long enough to reuse like this. So we installed the bracket further back in on the rail just behind the handle. The bracket meant for the handle is also not painted whereas the ones that mount on the rail are so they sprayed it for me. I'm guessing that because it was meant to sit behind the handle it wasn't meant to be seen. I'll post a pic shortly.

Edited by Smrtasp
Spelling
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Smrtasp said:

Just went over the install and there was an adjustment needed for the handle. The cover came with a bracket meant to mount in the corner where the handle is currently installed. The handle is supposed to be removed and the bracket installed then the handle mounts back on top of the bracket. The problem is that the bolts are factory mounted inside the bed and aren't long enough to reuse like this. So we installed the bracket further back in on the rail just behind the handle. The bracket meant for the handle is also not painted whereas the ones that mount on the rail are so they sprayed it for me. I'm guessing that because it was meant to sit behind the handle it wasn't meant to be seen. I'll post a pic shortly.

Thanks a bunch for the detailed info & hopefully pics.

Posted
20 hours ago, Smitty said:

I went and actually checked out a showroom today that had 9 different covers on display.   If you haven't checked out the Retrax line, I highly suggest it.  They are BY FAR the most expensive but they are without a doubt made better, offer a lifetime warranty and they just work really well!   If you are buying a $40-70k truck I can't understand why you would skimp and put a $200 cover on it!   

I must say, that ReTrax cover is awesome!

Thank you for sharing this!

Posted
2 hours ago, Smrtasp said:

Just went over the install and there was an adjustment needed for the handle. The cover came with a bracket meant to mount in the corner where the handle is currently installed. The handle is supposed to be removed and the bracket installed then the handle mounts back on top of the bracket. The problem is that the bolts are factory mounted inside the bed and aren't long enough to reuse like this. So we installed the bracket further back in on the rail just behind the handle. The bracket meant for the handle is also not painted whereas the ones that mount on the rail are so they sprayed it for me. I'm guessing that because it was meant to sit behind the handle it wasn't meant to be seen. I'll post a pic shortly.

Here is a picture of the install. All 4 guides are now installed on the rails as opposed to the instructions showing to install the one on the handle mount. Works great and locks perfectly.

20190814_084636.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Smrtasp said:

Here is a picture of the install. All 4 guides are now installed on the rails as opposed to the instructions showing to install the one on the handle mount. Works great and locks perfectly.

20190814_084636.jpg

I've watched several install videos for 2019 GM trucks - none had the assist handle which figures?  I may be able to slide the included light onto the rail first and not have to take off the assist handle at all.  That I can think of, that should be the only thing which would get in the way of the assist handle based on the install videos that I watched.  The clamp in that area can be installed without removing the handle as well.

 

I'll get it figured out - thanks for the additional info & especially the pic!

Posted

Extang EnCore IMO is the most practical and best looking cover out there29fe61a492fe36a375453110193874ff.jpg

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Smrtasp said:

Here is a picture of the install. All 4 guides are now installed on the rails as opposed to the instructions showing to install the one on the handle mount. Works great and locks perfectly.

20190814_084636.jpg

F5DC5407-D3D7-4ACC-A265-F6CE0D43758E.thumb.jpeg.e44e9f322a758a101233f71a74a7496e.jpeg

Got the Ultra Flex installed this evening. Didn’t have to remove the assist handle since I slid the LED light bar on the rail first like I mentioned earlier. Ended up looking almost exactly like your pic as far as bracket & light bar locations. Pretty pleased with it but will have to see how the weather strips behave after a couple of weeks in the sun. Will double check alignment as well - got it close enough for now.

 

Thanks again for the info & pic - made things much simpler once my dumb a$$ figured out exactly where the brackets fit into the rail. A bird crapped on it not 2 hours after I was done ?

Edited by Wheelguy
Posted
7 hours ago, Smrtasp said:

Glad it worked out, That's what these forums are for. Looks great btw. 

Thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...