Jump to content

Bilstein 5100 release date

JimTX
 Share

Recommended Posts

econometrics Senior Enthusiast

econometrics

Posted
Posted

 

30 minutes ago, vancealot29 said:

So, I was quoted something like $350 for a 2 inch front level with alignment.  Will these new shocks do the same?  How much more $ are you talking?  I have no problem waiting if that is the case.

 

Thanks for the info!

I got a $680 quote for a 1.5 level installed with alignment. I need to call a few other shops. 

 

But the shocks themselves are about $110 each. That's about the price of a quality leveling kit, so why not add another $110 and get a much improved ride over the Ranchos WITH a level. 

 

5100 Leveling Shocks can go up to 2.75", I believe. 

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

mikedege
mikedege

Hi Guys,    For what its worth, I loaned my new truck to Bilstein to use my 2020 Silverado Crewcab 4X4 3.0L Dramax as a test mule last week. I am near their San Diego Corporate office a

lebag335
lebag335

I had 5100’s put on my ‘15 Ford FX4 Lariat. They made a HUGE difference. However; the Ranchos on my TB LT are excellent and feel as well, if not better, than the 5100’s on my Ford. I will not be chang

econometrics
econometrics

Just an update on this... I emailed Bilstein today.    They said the product would "hit the shelves first quarter of 2020".    Looking forward to putting some 5100 ride leveling sh

Posted Images

vancealot29 Enthusiast

vancealot29

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, econometrics said:

 

I got a $680 quote for a 1.5 level installed with alignment. I need to call a few other shops. 

 

But the shocks themselves are about $110 each. That's about the price of a quality leveling kit, so why not add another $110 and get a much improved ride over the Ranchos WITH a level. 

 

5100 Leveling Shocks can go up to 2.75", I believe. 

Thank you, good info.

 

I looked back at my notes, and the quote for the 2 inch level with alignment was $399.

 

So, ~$220ish for the parts, do you have an idea of what the quoted install time is for the labor charge, or is this something simple enough that I can do in my garage?  I would assume the labor charge would be at least two hours, or another ~$200 on top.  Is an alignment still necessary on top of that?

 

Sorry for all the Q's, but this just seems like a better bang for my (400) buck(s).

 

Thanks for the help!

econometrics Senior Enthusiast

econometrics

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, vancealot29 said:

Thank you, good info.

 

I looked back at my notes, and the quote for the 2 inch level with alignment was $399.

 

So, ~$220ish for the parts, do you have an idea of what the quoted install time is for the labor charge, or is this something simple enough that I can do in my garage?  I would assume the labor charge would be at least two hours, or another ~$200 on top.  Is an alignment still necessary on top of that?

 

Sorry for all the Q's, but this just seems like a better bang for my (400) buck(s).

 

Thanks for the help!

I think it's definitely better bang for your buck, especially if you have the Ranchos. The Bilsteins up front will perform much better. So, yeah, why not spend 25-30% more and get a better long-term product? 

 

You'll need an alignment if you go with the Bilsteins, yes. I'm sure you can install them yourself if you have the right tools and a little mechanical know-how. There's a few YouTube videos out there showing how to do this. It's a little more complicated than just putting a leveling block in, that's for sure. 

AJMBLAZER Enthusiast

AJMBLAZER

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, SamDSJR said:

So my truck is a Max Tow Package truck. Do you think this will modify my GVWR? I would think that the springs & the larger axle have more to do with that than the shocks. Thoughts?

The shocks won’t affect your GVWR or weight carrying capacity in any way. 

SamDSJR Enthusiast

SamDSJR

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, AJMBLAZER said:

The shocks won’t affect your GVWR or weight carrying capacity in any way. 

Awesome. Thanks for the input.

  • Thanks 1
Hobey Enthusiast

Hobey

Posted
Posted

How much can you tow with a Max PKG ??....thanks?

mistaare Enthusiast

mistaare

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, econometrics said:

The Bilsteins up front will perform much better. So, yeah, why not spend 25-30% more and get a better long-term product? 

 

I had a set of Bilsteins front/rear on my previous truck (‘09 taco) for 9-10 years of abuse and they held up great. 
 

Can’t comment with longevity on a full size truck, but anything HALF as good as on a mid-size = amazing. 

Welder2014 Enthusiast

Welder2014

Posted
Posted
On 8/15/2019 at 12:38 PM, Sin City Trail Boss said:

Interesting.

 

How will the 5100s compare to my stock Z71 Rancho shocks that come with the Trail Boss?

 

 

 

 

Installed Bilsteins on my 2014 Ext cab. Did not like them thought too much compression damping. If I wear out the Ranchos on my 2019 will replace with same. Am very happy with the ride and want to keep it that way.

   

Snuff Enthusiast

Snuff

Posted
Posted

I got tired of waiting and ordered 4 Eibach’s for $389 no tax and free shipping. Should arrive early next week.

  • Like 1
Dunn Senior Enthusiast

Dunn

Posted
Posted (edited)

yeah I talked to eibach today and their pro truck sport shocks are available now, but not springs....jan for those, and june for coilover kit....still good deal, I am 20 miles away from them so I cant escape tax....still debating between kings

 

the sales guy said ride quality isn't effected at all however you set ride height on fronts but find it hard to believe

 

snuff are you just gonna run stock springs with yours?

 

the stock suspension really does suck on these trucks, even on concrete freeway, cant imagine if I actually took it offroad

Edited by Dunn
SamDSJR Enthusiast

SamDSJR

Posted
Posted
On 12/4/2019 at 9:06 PM, Hobey said:

How much can you tow with a Max PKG ??....thanks?

My configuration is 11,400lbs. 2019 5.3 w/Max Tow, 3.42, 4x4, 8-Speed tranny, Crew Cab Short Bed, 18" rims.

Colossus Senior Enthusiast

Colossus

Posted
Posted

Just had 4 new bilstein 4600s installed on my 2500 Z71 as I am keeping my stock ride height for now.  Very pleased. 

  • Like 1
Snuff Enthusiast

Snuff

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 12/6/2019 at 1:17 AM, Dunn said:

yeah I talked to eibach today and their pro truck sport shocks are available now, but not springs....jan for those, and june for coilover kit....still good deal, I am 20 miles away from them so I cant escape tax....still debating between kings

 

the sales guy said ride quality isn't effected at all however you set ride height on fronts but find it hard to believe

 

snuff are you just gonna run stock springs with yours?

 

the stock suspension really does suck on these trucks, even on concrete freeway, cant imagine if I actually took it offroad

Yes - I am going to run stock springs and see how it goes.

Edited by Snuff
  • Like 1
econometrics Senior Enthusiast

econometrics

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Snuff said:

Yes - I am going to run sticks springs and see how it goes.

Look forward to hearing your thoughts on the Eibachs. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 472 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...