Jump to content

Allure of Jet Black Interior on GMC Denali\SLT


Recommended Posts

Posted

More of an observation and maybe a curiosity question ….

While searching for 2020 GMC Denali and SLT models online, it appears to me that maybe up to 80% of both the Denali and SLT have the Jet Black leather interior. The Denali offers an alternate color of Dark Ash Grey and the SLT offers an alternate color of Slate (which is a lighter crème color). Just curious, is Jet Black interior what most people desire?

 

My current 2014 GMC SLT has the Cocoa Dune, which I really like.

Posted

Yes. Black is in for almost every automotive segment. And no, it does not get too hot in the summer time

Posted

Jet black is the only way to go on my opinion, shows far less wear and tear, and less dirt.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Posted

I love my jet black interior in my '17. It's definitely a personal preference, but I've always preferred the darker interiors. The only exception for me personally were those beautiful brown leather King Ranch Superduty interiors. 

Posted

Black is simply easier to keep clean and wears better over time.  It does get hot in the summer, but I wouldn't have any other color interior...period.  Once you go black..........

Posted

Had cocoa dune in my last truck and it would have been my choice in this one if available.  The problem is that is shows dirt wore and even wear.  

Posted

I made it a point not to get black in this truck.  I love the cocoa dune.  My wife's Buick has black interior, and it is warmer inside.  

 

In fact, I still have scars from my mom's dark blue vinyl station wagon seats.  I think you could have seared steaks on those things.  

Posted

All that black is a JOKE!  Shows nothing but DIRT!  Black this black that black rims?  How about a the Black taillight covers?  Yeah...looks cool guys!  JOKE!

Posted
2 hours ago, FiatDale said:

Yes. Black is in for almost every automotive segment. And no, it does not get too hot in the summer time

Hmm...

 

According to the National Safe Kids Organization, if the ambient
temperature is 79 degrees F, car interiors can reach the following
temperatures!

 White Interior             135 degrees F
 Red   Interior             154 degrees F
 Blue/Green Interior        165 degrees F
 Black Interior             192 degrees F

If the interior is hotter then the seats are hotter with leather. My GTO has the black leather seats and it would still be radiating heat 20 minutes later when I got home from the head rests after sitting in the sun all day. 

21 minutes ago, mookdoc6 said:

All that black is a JOKE!  Shows nothing but DIRT!  Black this black that black rims?  How about a the Black taillight covers?  Yeah...looks cool guys!  JOKE!

Correction, it shows dust, not dirt. I can easily wipe off dust, it is much harder removing blue jean stains or rubbed in dirt from tan... I never got on board with black wheels, tinted tail lights, etc. I am also done with black paint, my dark green is a little dark here in Texas but looks good. Are you also grumpy about window tint being black? 

 

I prefer a black interior, though I get cloth not leather so the seating surface isn't much different. As others have mentioned it just looks less worn and dirty over the years, especially if you use your truck to do DIY stuff or work regularly. My brother used his Rendezvous for pools back in college and it was tan, that thing looks dirty and was hard to get somewhat clean. Was it cooler, yes.

 

Tyler

Posted

I have a black interior with the  grey headliner but this would not be my first choice if I factory ordered.  I wish there were far more interior colour options!   An all red interior with a black, white or red exterior (or two-tone combination of these colours) would be classic!   

Posted
20 minutes ago, Donstar said:

I have a black interior with the  grey headliner but this would not be my first choice if I factory ordered.  I wish there were far more interior colour options!   An all red interior with a black, white or red exterior (or two-tone combination of these colours) would be classic!   

You know I can't stand FERD Donstar but that is the FERD guy in you talking about the Red!  I liked the Red too!

Posted
12 minutes ago, mookdoc6 said:

You know I can't stand FERD Donstar but that is the FERD guy in you talking about the Red!  I liked the Red too!

Yes, I must admit that I have owned a few Fords with red interiors.  My first was a '69 F100 Black and White two-tone with red interior! Beautiful truck!   To be fair, I owned a '76 Sierra 3/4 ton with Red and White two tone paint and an all red cloth interior!

Posted

I put the weight on the exterior color as far is the interior choice. Heat be damned (mitigated somewhat by vented seats), it’s hard for me to imagine a black truck with anything but a black interior. 
 

Speaking specifically of these GM trucks and the two color options you get in most trims, there are only a few exterior shades that complement the tan-grey and dark brown interior combo...white, and the earth tones. In my view that brown interior doesn’t jive in a silver truck; clashes for me. Conversely, I wouldn’t want a jet black interior in a brown truck, also clashes. A lot of what the dealers order probably reflects my opinion.

Posted

I went with black on my 18 Denali Ultimate, and have no regrets.  The tan leather can get stained with blue Jean denim dye,  from what I’ve seen.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Well one of our most reliable vehicles was sold yesterday. The first and only I gave for free to a grandkid. If they got skin in the game they take care of it. My wife bought new. Five years later my daughter got it to use. We got it back and gave it to our grandson after graduation. He did zero maintenance just oil changes. When the AC quit he drove his mother’s car rather than get it fixed. Instead he just bought a beater and sold the Elantra. 
    • I usually do as well or better than the sticker for mileage. Usually better going west than east. North then South. Wind makes a difference. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But it did dawn on me I’m going by the vehicle calculation. Now that would be interesting.
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...