Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys, feel free to move this thread if it's in the wrong topic. I need rotors for my 2017 Silverado, my current rotors have 107,000km on them and are starting to pulsate. As the title states, should I go with the OEM ones with their FNC (feretic nitrocarburizing) process which I must admit are incredibly durable to have lasted me over 100,000km. Or the specialty units which supposedly are made by raybestos and have a higher carbon content in the metal to absorb and dissipate heat but no FNC corrosion resistance.

 

I now live in a mountainous area that's not by the ocean and has pretty minimal rain fall, however in the winter time calcium chloride is used prior to snowfalls. Winter is fairly short lived and snow is minimal now where I live unless I drive the mountain pass. I drive it like I stole it and use my brakes hard.

 

Advice???

 

Sent from my Samsung using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Canadian GM Guy said:

 

Hi guys, feel free to move this thread if it's in the wrong topic. I need rotors for my 2017 Silverado, my current rotors have 107,000km on them and are starting to pulsate. As the title states, should I go with the OEM ones with their FNC (feretic nitrocarburizing) process which I must admit are incredibly durable to have lasted me over 100,000km. Or the specialty units which supposedly are made by raybestos and have a higher carbon content in the metal to absorb and dissipate heat but no FNC corrosion resistance.

 

 

I now live in a mountainous area that's not by the ocean and has pretty minimal rain fall, however in the winter time calcium chloride is used prior to snowfalls. Winter is fairly short lived and snow is minimal now where I live unless I drive the mountain pass. I drive it like I stole it and use my brakes hard.

 

Advice???

 

Sent from my Samsung using Tapatalk

 

 

 

I recommend you have them turned by a brake shop before replacing.  Turning a rotor is the process of smoothing the contact area.  That will take care of the vibration.

Posted
I recommend you have them turned by a brake shop before replacing.  Turning a rotor is the process of smoothing the contact area.  That will take care of the vibration.
Can't, they're below GM specified minimum thickness.

Sent from my Samsung using Tapatalk

Posted
12 hours ago, btj_z71 said:

I recommend you have them turned by a brake shop before replacing.  Turning a rotor is the process of smoothing the contact area.  That will take care of the vibration.

Nobody does that any more do they?

Rotors are fairly cheap .

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, dieselfan1 said:

Nobody does that any more do they?

Rotors are fairly cheap .

Yes, some people (owners) do & many Auto shop still do turning. There's a newer process where they turn you rotors while they're still on the car/truck but I'm not sure what that costs. I think regular turning is about $15/$20 per rotor. Turning is about the same price as new If you buy the cheap/less expensive rotors (usually from China)  @$20-$30 each. If you where to but AC Delco, which I think is the same as GM's OEM, they run about $53-$56/each from what I've seen. To me, it's an individuals/personal choice on how they like to spend money on their trucks. I may get flamed on this one, but in years past, I have never had any problem running rotors beyond the min. thickness on BMW's or Chey trucks. I think it's more of a liability issue with the Mfg. They don't want to get sued if someone can put blame on them for NOT recommending new rotors & you have an accident. They have to put limits somewhere. With that said, all my driving had been more of commuter driving than hauling a heavy trailer. If that were the case, I'd for sure replace rotors & pads.

To the original question about which rotors to buy (should I go with the OEM ones with their FNC (feretic nitrocarburizing) , here's what I found on that. 

"Ferritic nitrocarburized surface treatment of cast iron brake rotors providing oxidation resistance, good braking performance and absence of distortion. Machined brake rotors are pre-heated, then immersed into a high temperature molten nitrocarburizing salt bath for a first predetermined dwell time. After removing the brake rotors from the nitrocarburizing salt bath, the brake rotors are directly immersed into an oxidizing salt bath at a lower temperature than the nitrocarburizing salt bath so that the brake rotors are thermally quenched. After a predetermined second dwell time in the oxidizing salt bath, the brake rotors are removed therefrom and further cooled to room temperature, either by water application thermal quenching or slow cooling in air. A fixture provides stable holding the brake rotors with a minimum of contact during placement in the salt baths."

 

I retired from a Tool & Mold shop after 40 years. We had our own heat treating department that we did "Nitriding" which is technically the same as described above. This actually puts a thin hardened case on the surface of steel, so I would assume it does the same on these cast Iron rotors. I'm not sure how much rust prevention it does.

 

New AC Delco rotors on RockAuto,com call out that they are "ACDelco Advantage Coated Brake Rotors provide reliable braking power. Their robotic-applied, baked-on coating helps prevent brake pulsation, helps prevent the rotor from seizing to the hub, and provides excellent rust prevention against harsh environmental elements such as rain, snow, and corrosive road sprays. "

I'd probably go with some this like this myself. I know ALL newer BMW's come now with a Coating that helps prevent rust. The rotors I had on my last truck ('96 Ext cab Z71) they rotors would rust terribly. That's got to be NOT GOOD.

 

Good luck with your choice.

 

 

Posted

I'm very torn on the one hand you have the OE ones that are FNC and "durable" and on the other you have the severe duty rotors that are supposed to be better for just that.... severe use.

Sent from my Samsung using Tapatalk

Posted

I drive it like I stole it and use my brakes hard.

Heat dissipation maybe a better choice.

 

:) 

Posted (edited)

I’m a big fan of oem

 

I took my truck to the dealer to replace the pads and rotors, stupid me assumed they were using oem. Got some other AC delco brakes. When I came back and confronted them, they said....”they come off the same assembly line”

 

the hub was rusted to ****** in a month, and they squeel in reverse.

 

best of all, it was the first time in my life I decided, “I have enough money, let me pay someone to do my brakes for me.”

 

edit:just realized that was a pretty off topic rant 

Edited by truckguy82
Posted

Thanks for the input everyone.

Here are the benefits of each as I see them...

OEM:
FNC coating (anti corrosive as hell but that's about it)

AcDelco Severe Duty:
Maybe not be as anti corrosive but should handle heat more efficiently and warp less because of the metallurgy

Does anyone have any other suggestions I should be looking at?



Sent from my Samsung using Tapatalk

Posted

Go GM OE, truck still stops great right?  ACDelco Advantage is el cheapo stuff.  That's what I did, no regrets.

Posted

This does bring up an interesting question 'for me' anyway. Who does make OE Rotors for GM? Here's what I found when I did a search.

GM OE Brake Rotor

 

Now "click" on the link for "Buy Parts".  Then when you get to that page..'Click' on "Find online"

It will bring up (5) online sources. Did you guess right?..https://www.acdelco.com/shop/brakes#!?productLines=17

 

Posted

I just replaced my front brakes since the rotors had a good lip on the outside edge of the inner side of the rotor. The pads were less than a quarter of life left and I knew the dealer would fail my inspection for it, hell they put my rears as having less than half their life on them when I just replaced the pads only a year ago, there is no way that burned through that fast. 

 

Anyway, I went with these rotors https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01IU5HYJQ/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o02_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 and these pads https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01E6IWZW2/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 and the stopping power is a whole hell of a lot different now. It stopped fine before but my brakes are so much more responsive now and I have never had that experience in the past with any brake service I have performed. I had to replace one of the rubber slide pin boots as it had a tiny hole in it and let water get in and rust the pin a bit but I just put the pin on the wire wheel and it is brand new again and the bore was perfect. I also finally bought a brake caliper file https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00XMRE040/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o08_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 and use it to clean all of the surface rust chunks off of the mounting tabs where the pads sit in the bracket and greased up both sides with permatex ceramic lubricant. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
    • Progress... sort of.   Intake is disassembled, spider is out, fuel lines removed. Used a torch on the stripped screw with the lower intake off, much easier when I've got the intake sitting on my workbench, I made it talk. Walked right out with a pair of vice grips once it was nice and toasty hot.   New parts are piling up on my service cart waiting to be installed. Distributor, temperature sensor, new gaskets, fuel line kit, themostat, water neck.   My new pickle is I don't want to spend $600 on a replacement spider. I'm not sure IT is bad. I'm probably splitting hairs. Or it's $300 to send mine away and another 3 weeks of the truck just sitting. I have half a mind to assemble everything with the old spider to see if I can get away with just replacing the fuel pressure regulator to be safe. The obvious issue was the gushing high pressure fuel line which will be replaced. Getting to the spider really isn't that hard, and now I know what I'm doing , swapping it would be a breeze should it absolutely need one. Stupid, or smart?   The part that gives me pause is replacing the distributor. Well, it's already out. And I didn't mark it, whoopsie! Engine was at TDC when I removed it, I know that, so upon correct reinstall the metal tip on the rotor should point to the TDC mark on the distributor because that's where it was pointing on the old distributor. Worst case I'm a tooth off and have to re-stab it.   But then, what? I assume the truck will start. It doesn't appear the timing can be set. Here's the problem: These distributors can't be rotated but a degree or two, by design. What I read is Cam ****** needs to be -2 to +2 degrees, ideally at 0 (and checked/set above 1000 rpm). There should be enough wiggle to get that properly set, but checking the reported value is another potential issue. My Actron 9185 scanner says it supports enhanced GM PIDs and Cam ****** is one of them but it's unclear that I'll be able to correctly see it over OBD 1.5. I can see why people end up junking these things with life left in them. They're an absolute nightmare with tweener-year diagnostics/electronics and unobtanium parts.   Fingers crossed it starts and idles nicely. There can be hope, right? I'ma buy a lottery ticket the same day just in case.   Next steps..DO IT. I have not installed an intake before so I've been reading and watching a lot. Some say NO RTV except on china walls, some say DO RTV on water ports but not fuel/air intake. 1/4 or 3/8 bead on China walls? I think my strategy will be, obviously, RTV china walls with overlap on the gasket corners. Chapstick-style RTV the water ports. Leave intake ports dry. The only set of intake gaskets I could find locally are Edelbrock performance gaskets (uh...for an asthmatic 190hp V6? LOL) so we'll see how they do.   #NoToolLeftBehind. It took an hour, but my recovery mission for my deep 10mm socket was successful. It had rolled down the bellhousing and wedged itself between what I think are the fuel lines? I couldn't see it at all, but with a junk antenna I had laying around, I blindly went poking/sweeping for it, heard it clink, raised the truck, and caught a sliver glimpse of chrome with a flashlight way up there in Narnia. I had pushed it farther along the lines holding it captive, but within access of severely improvised tools, poking and cursing at it to finally knock it free to where I could get a fingertip on it to bring it home.    Not much to see.      
    • Thats crazy considering im right next door (Indiana)
    • For a limited time, retail and commercial accounts receive an AMSOIL Vinyl Tool Tray with their order of $500 or more when they use code TRAY726 at checkout. The promotion runs through July 21, 2026.   Order at https://syntheticadvantage.com   Want to use AMSOIL in your business or sell at your store, apply here.  https://www.amsoil.com/business-opportunities/?zo=521390  
    • It wouldn’t have happened if the government hadn’t mandated outrageous fuel mileage standards. It does very little for the consumer. It adds cost. Back during Covid there was a chip shortage. They gave a rebate for your truck if it didn’t have the chip to turn on cylinder deactivation. It was 50$ because at best you may see 1/2 a mile increase per gallon. Splitting hairs each fuel mileage trick wasn’t mandated. The government doesn’t do the engineering work and say use this until it’s already in use and they like it. The fuel mileage was mandated. And those add ons the results. There’s a mandate and they are the results.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...