Jump to content

Free oil change- yay or nay

Andyh1
 Share

Recommended Posts

Z45 Senior Enthusiast

Z45

Posted
Posted

The job of the lube tech and service adviser is to sell services, weather you need them or not. So take anything they try to sell you with skepticism. Oil changes are the key to success in pushing related products and services for the GM dealer. I saw recently a survey that said that oil changes are the number one maintenance service and lead to 56 percent of repair/upsell opportunities.

Bob2C Enthusiast

Bob2C

Posted
Posted

That’s why I do all my own oil changes and maintenance/repairs unless it needs warranty work. Never used the 2 free oil changes. I know the job is getting done right when i do it, I don’t need to listen to them up sell me on something I don’t need, I don’t need to waste an hour or more there and I can do it cheaper.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Forgot about this until elcamino posted. I had done maintenance on my mother in laws car. She took it to a shop for an oil change because they sent a coupon in the mail. They put brakes on the front, changed the air filter and rotated the tires. I had done these services about a month before. She forgot. 

I was in retail for a few years. Up-selling was the biggest push on a regular basis.

:)

mookdoc6 Senior Enthusiast

mookdoc6

Posted
Posted

Give them the one chance....I know I did!  First time in decades I let em have something other than warranty work.   Yup, they overfilled her by 1qt told me no biggie?

stevejones Enthusiast

stevejones

Posted
Posted (edited)

If it's leased, then yes.

If I bought it, then no.

 

Had a good string back when 4 oil changes were included in a new Chevy purchase.  I had a couple of 2-year leases for the wife; never had to do crap to those vehicles.

Edited by stevejones
Snakes709 Enthusiast

Snakes709

Posted
Posted

Normally i do my own work. But im paying for these 4 free oil changes, might as well use them. I inspect their work afterwards, no issues thus far. Used 2 of the 4 out changes so far and about to use the 3rd. 

aseibel Senior Enthusiast

aseibel

Posted
Posted

I took advantage of the 4 free oil changes. I was unhappy when I found out they decided not to rotate the tires, even though that was supposed to be included. I called them back and was told they inspected the tires and decided it was not needed. Without talking to me.

 

So take advantage if you want to. As long as you know going in they have a reputation for taking short cuts/ upselling/ everything else. Then you can inspect their work before you leave and decline any additional services.

DFW-AT4 Enthusiast

DFW-AT4

Posted
Posted (edited)

Never again! My wife took her new Traverse in to the dealer for it's first oil change. She came home with oil smoke rolling out if the exhaust. Pulled the dipstick and the overfilled by 6 quarts! Yes, that's right, they double filled it. It was darn near coming out of the dipstick tube! Had them send a wrecker to pick it up, they wanted her to drive it back and I threw a fit. After rectifying the problem, I asked them for a service ticket saying that they had overfilled in case there were catalytic convertor problems, or seal issues, later in life. They did, but left out the fact of it being overfilled by 6 quarts. Again, I had to get ugly to get what I wanted. They failed to see the difference between it being overfilled by a quart vs 6 quarts. Like I said... Never AGAIN!

Edited by DFW-AT4
OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted

Like everything, it depends on the dealer doing the work. Obviously not everyone’s experiences are as horrible as what some have shared or we’d have a lot more engine failures in the world. Most people are not enthusiasts. Or they are too busy / physically unable to do the job themselves. So it’s important to keep perspective that dealer oil changes go just fine almost all of the time...you just don’t hear about it.

 

Personally, I have no issue spending the $60-$80 to get the oil changed and tires rotated. And even less issue using the free one. ?

PPK Enthusiast

PPK

Posted
Posted

I have two freebies with my GMC... i think it makes sense to have it in the dealer a coule of times to show you maintain it... i always clean mine under the hood before i let them replace the oil and filter.. the worst thing they can do it get dirt in the fill.. 

jlong1984 Enthusiast

jlong1984

Posted
Posted

I've always taken my trucks to the dealer for service. Never had a problem. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • NDKoze
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By NDKoze · Posted

      If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...