Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This sort of thing happens all the time when people hear what they don't want to hear.

 

Ya know, like your broker calls and says he's lost all your money.

NO!

That can't be true!!

I don't want to hear that!

Your fired.

(to late) 

:lol:

 

What we have here is a grumpy old bear saying, "He's going to loose all  your money" and a third party saying .....

Physics isn't an opinion and the laws of physics are not theory and....they are not mine,

but hey, he is right about the last part and I thank him for making my point for me.

 

It isn't what he want's to hear no matter how true it is.

 

So sad....:sigh:

 

It's a hard way to learn.

 

 
 
 
 

It’s kinda like when we were young and naive. I do think they’re neat to look at. Maybe I should buy one, custom build a clear polymer enforced glass hood and then I’ll be happy with it?
It’s pretty though....
8202b2488d09c40ed97331197c1e3ff1.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, TXGREEK said:


It’s kinda like when we were young and naive. I do think they’re neat to look at. Maybe I should buy one, custom build a clear polymer enforced glass hood and then I’ll be happy with it?
It’s pretty though....
8202b2488d09c40ed97331197c1e3ff1.jpg
 

Sure is. I use to have these on my tuner Honda's. Injen I believe. Colorful, shinny. Looked good under the hood with the custom ignition and fuel rail 'up grades' and polished tower brace. Added custom tunable cam gear, header...yada yada yada. Chrome, polished alloys..yum..... :) 

 

The only things that actually worked was the short throw shifter and the Red Line MTL which totally transformed the way the box came in and out of 1st gear. And the KYB gas double adjustable shocks/struts. 

 

The ignition system failed as fast as you could swap control boxes. Pretty hard to improve on a Honda ignition. Cam gear did zip anywhere but the dyno room. The header was a total waste of money. A Honda stainless exhaust is 'forever' Header not so much. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
Posted

Wow both guys that have modified their trucks for their own taste are chastising people for doing the same. I’ve had several factory hot rods of late that had factory aftermarket looking CALs on them. I agree they don’t add too much today like they use to. But they do add sound. And makes the owner happy. Much like lifting and lowering and buying different rims. Some guy showed his results before and after. Motor Week even showed fuel mileage gains, plus performance gains on one their shows. Even a advertiser on this site has shown gains. So being skeptical is one thing, belittling someone is another.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Posted by Grump Bear “This sort of thing happens all the time when people hear what they don't want to hear.“

 

Wow!  If this isn’t the most hypocritical thing posted. OntheReel gave us all real life numerical data showing his improvements and this older cynical man makes this comment?  Unreal. Just shows how closed minded some people are. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, TNTSilverado said:

Posted by Grump Bear “This sort of thing happens all the time when people hear what they don't want to hear.“

 

Wow!  If this isn’t the most hypocritical thing posted. OntheReel gave us all real life numerical data showing his improvements and this older cynical man makes this comment?  Unreal. Just shows how closed minded some people are. 

? yeah I think his quote should more accurately read: 

 

"This sort of thing happens all the time when people hear what they don't want to hear... of course, I exempt myself from this very statement. And should you question my exemption, I'll sidetrack this thread so hard and fast it will make your neck snap." 

  • Haha 3
Posted

Grumpy does have a point, no one wants to admit anything wrong with what they’ve done especially cause they’re costly add ons that may or may not add horsepower but hey, they make a sound and look cool under the hood.

Although I didn’t buy a truck to race it, you guys think that I’ll definitely get some additional horsepower and torque by adding one, especially being that I’ve got a performance tune on?

Maybe, I should have my engine cleaned before I install one, wouldn’t want to clash under the hood.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I’ve also seen posted on a few threads that some people are swapping out the 5.3 throttle body to a 6.2 throttle body prior to installing a CAI, specific to the new throttle body.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Just circling back after yesterday...

 

After installing my fuel line magnets last night, I'm happy to report that I got to work 2 minutes earlier today!  Real-world numbers, boys!  That's some science!  Straighten out those fuel molecules and you can see the benefits, too!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Salsa De Piña said:

Just circling back after yesterday...

 

After installing my fuel line magnets last night, I'm happy to report that I got to work 2 minutes earlier today!  Real-world numbers, boys!  That's some science!  Straighten out those fuel molecules and you can see the benefits, too!

Glad those worked for you.  Some people will install the magnets backwards, then just throw them away when they get no benefits...

Posted
On 9/16/2020 at 10:28 AM, Ed/2020RST said:

I am not a person to throw money away so I have been doing my research on which CAI system to install on my 2020 Silverado RST (5.3) or if I should put one on at all.  

IMHO...No.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

All this arguing... Just run your cold air kit of choice, but be sure to install a 2 port catch can and switch to Oreilly brand 10w30 conventional oil and a Fram filter. Did I miss anything?

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

An engine is basically an air pump. The more air you can get in and out of it, the more power you are going to make. This is why heads are ported and polished. Intake manifolds are port matched to the intake runners and headers are matched to the exhaust ports. Is it really necessary to have a 5 angle vs. a 3 angle valve job. If you want the most hp you will get the 5 angle. It will smooth and flow more air around the valve and the valve seat creating hp. Its all about increasing and smoothing the air flow through the engine.

Why do high performance vehicles use mandrel bent exhaust tubing instead of crush bent tubing? Because it flows more air more smoothly. Just like a cold air intake will flow more air, more smoothly than the factory intake. The factory intake has a restrictive filter, the accordion style adapter, and the huge silencer. These all create turbulence in the air flow which slows it down and causes a reduction in air flowing into the engine (a loss in hp.)

Although each one of these mods mentioned may only give you a small increase in air flow and hp. They all add up to make a noticeable difference.

Edited by Firehawk T/A
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Firehawk T/A said:

Although each one of these mods mentioned may only give you a small increase in air flow and hp. They all add up to make a noticeable difference.

All of this post is rock solid. Especially this last part quoted above. 

 

Here's the part that gets lost.

All the air enhancement in the world only shows at.......

WOT

 

The throttle body is located AFTER the air box so any possible flow increase happens AFTER the blade is open far enough and the rpm high enough to exceed the capability of the original configuration. Actually that would be true if the blade were before it as well. 

 

If the OEM is capable of 325 hp then the increase, if any, isn't being used until the demand on the motor exceeds this number.

 

When you see that increase in torque 1500 rpm below peak power that number is still being generated at WOT. 

 

When might happen? Towing a steep grade with a load heavy enough to demand WOT in the lowest gear it will hold at the speed being traveled. (Ya need more truck) Drag racing (at the track). Passing in a situation where you shouldn't be (You need better judgement). On the dyno. At Bonneville or Murdock. (All of which are fun) 

 

Give that list a look and ask yourself what percentage of the time you are driving is spent in anyone of those situations. 

 

 

 

Posted

Got my cold air intake from CAI installed today. Had a bit of a problem with getting the stock PCV valve off until I realized you have to push the little gray tab in, then pull. Took her out as soon as I finished (about 30 min) and immediately noticed an awesome sounding note coming from the engine bay when I gave it some gas. Normal driving I didn't notice anything. But taking her onto the interstate and giving her some gas was pretty awesome!

 

More info here: https://www.coldairinductions.com/shop/cold-air-inductions-products/cold-air-intakes/chevrolet/silverado/2019-2020-silverado-and-sierra-1500-5-3l-truck-cold-air-intake-textured-black-512-0105-b/

They claim an average 12HP at the rear wheels and increased fuel economy. Although I have no way or desire to test this, I'm definitely pleased with my purchase!

IMG_0772.thumb.jpeg.ba413e9a89edef40b91a072dca1b1f83.jpeg

  • Like 3
Posted

This is a good read. https://www.hpacademy.com/technical-articles/air-intake-restrictions-explained/  Ultimately any restriction to incoming air in an engine will result in reduced volumetric efficiency. For example a dirty air filter at any rpm range will reduce how efficent the engine is at filling each cylinder with air. The same is true for a cold air intake that is designed to flow better than the stock air box. At any given rpm it will be more efficient at filling the cylinders with air, thus creating more power. 

On any vehicle I have installed a cold air intake on, I have personally noticed that I need less throttle pressure to accelerate up to speed, along with a slight increase in fuel mileage. I highly doubt I will ever recoup the investment in fuel costs, but I don't really care. I like the way it looks, sounds and feels while driving it, and thats enough for me.

  • Like 5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,677
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RobbertClaus
    Newest Member
    RobbertClaus
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 480 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No I didn’t watch a video of a person who analyzes oil for a living explain general oil usage. For clarity I did ask my brothers one who runs our equipment business. The other who runs our old ROW business about oil usage. Nothing has changed since I retired. Their personal vehicles or work vehicles use no oil. Not enough to see on the oil checking device. Then I pondered. I like to ponder. In this extended oil changing world with oil change countdowns or lights. If engines used say a qt every 2500 miles or up to even 4000 miles. With oil changes reaching as high as 15000 miles. Normal for most people is eight to ten. Vehicles should potentially be seizing up all over the place. Especially in hilly terrain. Just how many people actually check their oil? Maybe 10 percent. Those are the people that probably change their oil early. I like to research used car listings. I have five favorite dealers I check. They all list carfax with their listing. It’s rare to see vehicles with anything but extended oil changes. Transmission service, forget about it. I’ve seen Honda and Toyota certified vehicles up to 100K miles and ten years old. With nothing but normal maintenance. Isn’t nice we all have different experiences and believe our way is the best. You certainly get backup for whatever you believe. Life would be boring otherwise.
    • Interesting rumor. Dealers near me have been tight-lipped so far, but if this reveal actually happens next week, I'm really hoping they finally give the HD a proper interior overhaul. The competition has been eating their lunch in the cabin department for a while now.
    • There are a few good takeaways in that video that pertain to this thread, certainly the possibility of the oil control rings having buildup, the fuel injectors and how clean or not that they are ending up affecting the pistons rings carbon buildup, and the fact that its normal up to a point for a given engine to use some oil, and that the oil quality that is being utilized is part of that ring clogging up issue as well.   I was talking with a neighbor yesterday who has a baby LZ0 duramax and he had bought it slightly used but it does consume some oil and he has switched over to 5W-30 Euro spec oil and in this case that never made a difference in consumption over the factory 0W-20 recommendation. He finds it uses a quart in about 3500 miles and as he goes a ways over that distance he adds oil to full and goes another 1000 miles or so and then changes oil and is typically at 40% or so left on the oil monitor at that point with his use case of quite a lot of highway miles and more limited in short run use. I don't know what other LZ0 engines are doing for oil consumption but that is what his is doing. 
    • I dont care what Lake says. Goodnight. 
    • Ok well I guess Lake disagrees with me on a few points. I call oil consumption pretty basic. Rudimentary. He calls it "really complicated." I think 1qt consumed in 3k miles is a lot. He says that's normal. In 22 minutes, he'll use his natural talent to explain oil consumption to anyone watching this video. He covers everything from obvious engine damage to how normally functioning healthy engines consume oil by design. Lake explicitly states how you drive will impact oil consumption.   Shut up and watch:    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...