Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can't tell you what to get but can share my general feelings when it comes to this debate:

 

1. I LOVE my 3.0 Duramax and happy I got it.

2. Sound - purely personal feeling, some love that good V8 sound and can't blame them one bit. Not a big deal for me, I actually really like the diesel sound. This 3.0 is very quiet which I also prefer. Others will certainly disagree.

3. I just changed my fuel filter for the first time at 25K+ miles, and I've done a lot of towing. You probably won't have to replace yours within the first 2 years and it's only like 100 or so bucks at dealership <1/2 penny per mile

4. Price of DEF? it's like $2/gallon and you don't fly through it unless your towing heavy loads a lot. Doesn't sound like the case in your situation. Put in a couple gallons every thousand miles at call it $5 total... Is this really a deal killer when you're buying a $40K-50K-60K truck?

5. Price of Diesel? In my experience it's been significantly cheaper than Premium gas and it quite a few cases actually cheaper the Regular gas!

6. Longer warranty on the 3.0 engine

7. Towing capacity? Be realistic how big a boat are you getting? If you're never going to tow anything that pushes that higher limit then towing capacity debate is irrevelant. It would be similar to saying the 6.2 max speed is 130 mph but the 3.0 max speed is only 120 mph. Advantage 6.2. Do you ever EVER plan on driving 120+??

 

Cheers! ?

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Leevon said:

Can't go wrong with any of them.  I'd be concerned about the long-term repair cost potential of the 3.0 though.  Anything with a 10-speed...8-speed is a turd.  

3.0 and 6.6 comes with a 5 year 100,000 mile powertrain warranty, vs 60,000 5 year powertrain on the gassers.

Bumper to bumper is still 36,000 3 year on them all.

 

https://www.gmc.com/owners/warranty-details

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Agreed on the new 6.6L gas motor. It’s gotten great reviews. Lots of power. It just needs the 10 speed backed behind it to unleash it’s full potential. I don’t understand why GM isn’t putting 10 speed in all their vehicles?  

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Agreed on the new 6.6L gas motor. It’s gotten great reviews. Lots of power. It just needs the 10 speed backed behind it to unleash it’s full potential. I don’t understand why GM isn’t putting 10 speed in all their vehicles?  
This is why I'm hesitant on getting the gasser. They have also changed the gearing from 4.10 to 3.73.

Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
On 12/30/2020 at 12:06 PM, TNTSilverado said:

Agreed on the new 6.6L gas motor. It’s gotten great reviews. Lots of power. It just needs the 10 speed backed behind it to unleash it’s full potential. I don’t understand why GM isn’t putting 10 speed in all their vehicles?  

1500 one is too light

25/3500 one is too heavy.

 

They need a 3rd one that is 'just right' for the HD duty cycle at the LT8 torque level. 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted
2 hours ago, redwngr said:

1500 one is too light

25/3500 one is too heavy.

 

They need a 3rd one that is 'just right' for the HD duty cycle at the LT8 torque level. 

 

 

So your thinking like I have thought that GM should bring back the big block 8.1L behemoth??  I totally agree

Posted
4 hours ago, TNTSilverado said:

So your thinking like I have thought that GM should bring back the big block 8.1L behemoth??  I totally agree

Nope.

It's 8.1 was no where near the torque capability of the HD 10 speed either.

 

6.6L LT8  401 Hp  464 ft-lb 

8.1L L18  340 Hp 455 ft-lb  (for 2001/2/3;  2004/5/6 were lower) 

 

I'm thinking they need a different transmission to match up with the LT8

 

Posted

They do have the 10L90 that handles 650tq in the ZL1. Seems like it would slot in nicely between the half ton 10 speed and the “Allison”. 


But it all comes down to money. And that there’s no requirement to report fuel economy the HD segment, thus no reason to increase efficiency. 

Posted
On 12/8/2020 at 3:43 PM, steelcity said:

5.3 mated to the 10 speed is a game changer.

Drove both before I bought the Trail Boss, L84 5.3, 10 speed. Way more zip than I thought it would have. It's fantastic! I love it!

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/8/2020 at 11:20 PM, leverett.scott said:

I love the 5.3, but I don't think you can get the 5.3 with the 10 speed in a Silverado, only GMC.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk
 

Your wrong. I have 2020 Trail Boss 5.3 L84 10 speed. Love it.

 

Posted

I have a 2020 LT with the 3.0, slightly over 16K so far and zero issues. Averaging 25-30 mpg on highway and have gotten as high as 38 with a good tail wind. Def usage has been minimal, have not added any between oil changes which I do every 5K, usually takes about 4 gallon for 5K. Fuel filter life was showing 44% at 16K when I had dealer change it at last service, cost $100 to have dealer do it which isn't really bad figuring you should get at least a year out of one although I will do the next one myself as a filter kit online is only $25 and it takes less than 15 minutes, this I plan to do yearly. The price of diesel and the higher octane gas is usually comparable to one another in my area although 91 octane is the most prevalent, 93 is scarce in my area. I would say that 80% of my driving is rural as I live in a rural area and do a lot of hunting and short trips to the farm. So far I am very happy with the 3.0 and 10 speed combo, this coming from a 19 Trail Boss which I had a lot of issues with.

Posted
13 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

They do have the 10L90 that handles 650tq in the ZL1. Seems like it would slot in nicely between the half ton 10 speed and the “Allison”. 


But it all comes down to money. And that there’s no requirement to report fuel economy the HD segment, thus no reason to increase efficiency. 

Instantaneous torque capability isn't the same as 'long period of time' torque capability. 

 

Duty cycle requirement in the HD segment will have a much higher percentage of full load than in the sport world. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, redwngr said:

Nope.

It's 8.1 was no where near the torque capability of the HD 10 speed either.

 

6.6L LT8  401 Hp  464 ft-lb 

8.1L L18  340 Hp 455 ft-lb  (for 2001/2/3;  2004/5/6 were lower) 

 

I'm thinking they need a different transmission to match up with the LT8

 

That’s the old 8.1L power number

with direct injection and other new technology they could get 500 HP out of 8.1L 

and the 10 spd would be perfect for this engine and even the 6.6L gasser. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,860
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    HWN808
    Newest Member
    HWN808
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 2 Anonymous, 966 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel $5.42 at the truck stop on the hi-way
    • I'm not sure if this should be a new topic, let me know if it's out of place. This my first post. Thanks 85077522 - AC Delco GM Genuine Parts Brake Master Cylinders. Anyone else had to replace this brake master cylinder yet. I didn't do any brake work, it looks like new parts and I've had the truck for about 4k miles, 119k total miles.  When it started to throw codes I did the calibrations with a bidirectional scanner and got the codes to clear but they came back so I did the routine; base bleed, automated bleed and final base bleed. All that with Bosch ES16-32N fluid (please look it up). That seemed to fix it but 100ish miles later it failed again so I ran the same process but with a pressure bleeder this time and got the same results, fixed for 100ish miles. The original fluid looked bad and I thought I got most of it out, it could've been the wrong fluid. The codes; P25A2, C05B0-00, C2A1B. I can get them to clear but not for long. The C05B0 indicates a leak in the front circuit (which is bone dry) so I'm thinking of doing the bleed process on that front again today and I don't know if that's taboo to just do the front but at this point it seems like it's worth the try anyway. The new master cylinder/module unit is supposed to get here today. But now I'm pretty much convinced this install is over my head. I've called several shops and some mobile guys that I know but this thing is like radio active material, scary wise. I did get 2 local shops say they should be able to do it, one says he has the SPS2 programing capability. And with the battery disconnected is there supposed to be pedal resistance, mine is to the floor, then if I pump it I can get some resistance. I had a panic stop prior to this issue which may have contributed from what I read. And on the first attempt to bleed and hydraulic test the scanner listed things to look for and one was any gaps between the pad and rotors which I did notice on the RF corner and I removed the outer pad (where the gap was) cleaned it and the hardware and didn't see a gap after that but will re-check it. I read that if pushing the caliper pistons back then you're supposed to open the bleeder so as to not push fluid backwards into the abs module or it will damage it. If that's true then that's also a possibility from the previous owner having the brakes changed before I got it. I'm using an XTool ip500 scanner. Any suggestions, questions and comments welcome. 
    • Next Friday will be my 6 week point from my right knee replacement.  The surgeon says it will be fine if I choose to drive after this checkup.  I know I could drive now but best to do as my surgeon (and my wife) tell me.  Richard compared being 62 to 72.  I remember when I was in my early 60's I was experiencing slow but regular decline in my mobility.  Thanks to good medical support,  i continued to fight the speed and spread of this decline. During my 60's I worked on non-surgical methods and just when I turned 70, my orthopedic surgeon recommended joint replacements.  In a little over a year, I had one shoulder and both knees replaced.  This hasn't been a terribly fun experience, but worth the discomfort as my future mobility health trajectory has reversed.  It is a treat to now be watching my mobility. balance and confidence steadily improve!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...