Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I currently have a 2019 RST, 5.3, 8 speed. I'm trading it in the get the 10 speed, I had a ton of transmission problems with my old Silverado, not doing it with this one.

My problem is, I can't figure out what engine I want, 3.0 or 6.2.

 

6.2

Pro

- 420 hp [emoji41]

- Decent gas mileage

- Higher tow capability

Con

- Premium gas

- Towing gas mileage?

 

 

3.0

Pro

- Great gas mileage

- Good for towing

Con

I might miss the sound of a V-8.

Lower tow capability

Expensive in the shop once out of warranty.

 

I plan to buy a boat in the next couple yrs, do not tow much now. I plan to keep the truck for a long time.

 

Let me hear your opinions, thanks.

 

Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted (edited)

I have a 6.2L and love it to death, but after driving  my stepdads 2020 Sierra 5.3L with new 10 speed, I could see myself buying one because it does at times get “cumbersome” putting premium fuel in the 6.2L. I know it’s not required but if you want all the performance out of the truck, might as well put it in.

GM did a great job making the 5.3L a respectable performer compared to the older K2 trucks.  I was truly impressed how well the truck accelerated, handled, and towed when driving it. I came from 2 K2 5.3L and it’s night and day difference.  
The 5.3L with 10 spd should be considered and he is getting about 3 mpgs better than my truck

Good luck with your decision 

Edited by TNTSilverado
Posted

I have the 5.3L and have wavered back and forth about getting the 6.2L or the 3.0L whenever I trade my 2019 in sometime in the next 1-2 years. I feel the same dilemma as you do, OP. 

 

On one hand, I love the fuel efficiency and the torque of the 3.0L. On the other hand, I love the sound of a V8, and the 6.2L is a beast. 

 

When I'm actually in the truck driving around in my usual driving, I find myself realizing that the 5.3L actually is a good fit for me. I think the 6.2L is something I just wish I had in specific moments (mainly accelerating for fun). I don't really tow, and I put about 8K miles on per year so MPG nor premium fuel is really a big issue for me. 

 

Suppose what I am saying is... stick with the 5.3L. You won't be buying an engine that is more costly to own (both 6.2L and 3.0L), and it really has a rock-solid performance history. 

Posted

Can’t beat the entertainment of the 6.2. But it is a thirsty MOFO. Currently at a lifetime economy of 14.1 MPG. Gonna see how gas prices are with the new leadership. Might wind up in a 3.0 by this time next year if things are looking bad.
 

Unless you find a deal you can’t turn down, you might wanna wait too. Won’t be long before the 2022 refresh is seen and it might put a hold on your plans.

  • Like 2
Posted

Dude, I was in the same boat some months ago.  Then I found the 2020 2500HD LT w/ the 6.6 gas.  I like it better than the 6.2 and takes regular gas.  The 6 speed is a def upgrade over the old 6 speed.  No clunking.  Smooth as silk.  Oh... and no cylinder deactivation.  No shut down at stop...  Iron block 400... whats not to love!

 

Like all the new models, the new 2500's are not without their issues.  However, I am so happy I got it over the 6.2 trail boss.

Posted

I've never done it because I am more than happy with the performance of my 5.3, but has anyone done a true comparison of a 5.3 running 87 octane vs one running 92 octane ?

 

Add an aftermarket CAI and exhaust and make all of the V-8 sound you want.

Posted

Once you have the 3.0 .. you'll not miss having the 6.2L 

 

Unless you are still into holeshots from red lights, there's just nothing compelling about the 6.2 compared to the 3.0.

 

I've owned both and will not look back at a gas gulper like the 6.2.  We're talking 40% better mileage in most cases IME. And, the 3.0 goes when you need it to.

 

Test drive both, you'll see.

Posted
38 minutes ago, steve841 said:

Once you have the 3.0 .. you'll not miss having the 6.2L 

 

Unless you are still into holeshots from red lights, there's just nothing compelling about the 6.2 compared to the 3.0.

 

I've owned both and will not look back at a gas gulper like the 6.2.  We're talking 40% better mileage in most cases IME. And, the 3.0 goes when you need it to.

 

Test drive both, you'll see.

You’re making me regret my recent purchase. I didn’t drive the 3.0 as I’m a sucker for a big v8. This thing drinks like I do! 

Posted

The 3.0l with the 10-speed is a fantastic combo.  Unless you are drag racing your truck and or really just like running a high-revving gas v8, the little Duramax is no-brainer in that truck. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, GMC207 said:

You’re making me regret my recent purchase. I didn’t drive the 3.0 as I’m a sucker for a big v8. This thing drinks like I do! 

LMAO ...  I've had 2 6.2's .. and couldnt take it anymore.  Bought the 3.0 without even driving it.  Same day, my brother bought the 6.2.

 

He quickly came to the realization he made a big mistake.  Best I ever saw on the 6.2 was 22 MPG on the 3.0, I hit 36!!!!

Posted
3 minutes ago, steve841 said:

LMAO ...  I've had 2 6.2's .. and couldnt take it anymore.  Bought the 3.0 without even driving it.  Same day, my brother bought the 6.2.

 

He quickly came to the realization he made a big mistake.  Best I ever saw on the 6.2 was 22 MPG on the 3.0, I hit 36!!!!

I guess I shouldn’t have judged it without driving it. I didn’t even consider it. I assumed it was a turd on the road haha. Baby D max. I’m gonna have to go take one out. 

Posted (edited)

Take one out you’ll love it!
 

I had a 17’ 5.3 that I Traded for the 3.0. The 3.0 does have a slight exhaust sound when your driving. I’d say the sound is more noticeable while driving then outside.

 

 I thought I would miss that v8 sound as well however over the past month and half I haven’t missed it once. Towing wise I can still tow 8500lbs, only 500 less than my 17’ 5.3.  

Edited by Crazypontiac03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,860
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    HWN808
    Newest Member
    HWN808
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 943 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel $5.42 at the truck stop on the hi-way
    • I'm not sure if this should be a new topic, let me know if it's out of place. This my first post. Thanks 85077522 - AC Delco GM Genuine Parts Brake Master Cylinders. Anyone else had to replace this brake master cylinder yet. I didn't do any brake work, it looks like new parts and I've had the truck for about 4k miles, 119k total miles.  When it started to throw codes I did the calibrations with a bidirectional scanner and got the codes to clear but they came back so I did the routine; base bleed, automated bleed and final base bleed. All that with Bosch ES16-32N fluid (please look it up). That seemed to fix it but 100ish miles later it failed again so I ran the same process but with a pressure bleeder this time and got the same results, fixed for 100ish miles. The original fluid looked bad and I thought I got most of it out, it could've been the wrong fluid. The codes; P25A2, C05B0-00, C2A1B. I can get them to clear but not for long. The C05B0 indicates a leak in the front circuit (which is bone dry) so I'm thinking of doing the bleed process on that front again today and I don't know if that's taboo to just do the front but at this point it seems like it's worth the try anyway. The new master cylinder/module unit is supposed to get here today. But now I'm pretty much convinced this install is over my head. I've called several shops and some mobile guys that I know but this thing is like radio active material, scary wise. I did get 2 local shops say they should be able to do it, one says he has the SPS2 programing capability. And with the battery disconnected is there supposed to be pedal resistance, mine is to the floor, then if I pump it I can get some resistance. I had a panic stop prior to this issue which may have contributed from what I read. And on the first attempt to bleed and hydraulic test the scanner listed things to look for and one was any gaps between the pad and rotors which I did notice on the RF corner and I removed the outer pad (where the gap was) cleaned it and the hardware and didn't see a gap after that but will re-check it. I read that if pushing the caliper pistons back then you're supposed to open the bleeder so as to not push fluid backwards into the abs module or it will damage it. If that's true then that's also a possibility from the previous owner having the brakes changed before I got it. I'm using an XTool ip500 scanner. Any suggestions, questions and comments welcome. 
    • Next Friday will be my 6 week point from my right knee replacement.  The surgeon says it will be fine if I choose to drive after this checkup.  I know I could drive now but best to do as my surgeon (and my wife) tell me.  Richard compared being 62 to 72.  I remember when I was in my early 60's I was experiencing slow but regular decline in my mobility.  Thanks to good medical support,  i continued to fight the speed and spread of this decline. During my 60's I worked on non-surgical methods and just when I turned 70, my orthopedic surgeon recommended joint replacements.  In a little over a year, I had one shoulder and both knees replaced.  This hasn't been a terribly fun experience, but worth the discomfort as my future mobility health trajectory has reversed.  It is a treat to now be watching my mobility. balance and confidence steadily improve!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...