Jump to content

6L80 Transmission unusual behavior?

rviscuso

By rviscuso
in Troubleshooting & Recalls

 Share

Recommended Posts

rviscuso Enthusiast

rviscuso

Posted
Posted

2017 Silverado LT 5.3 4X4 6speed transmission 51,000 miles

 

When I first bought the truck the transmission suffered from severe bucking or shudder under light load. GM calls it chuggle. The cause was "intermittent tcc delamination causing scoring on fluid pump". They replaced the torque converter, cover housing and pump cover along with a flush. This was at 10,000 miles. That seemed to solve the chugging problem.

 

For the last year or so I have noticed that the torque converter unlocks and locks frequently at freeway speeds. When it locks, following an unlock, there is a noticeable lurching forward. This is not neck snapping but is definitely noticeable. This lurching motion also occurs when upshifting 4/5 or 5/6. 

 

While driving at freeway speeds (65 70mph) when I slightly let off the accelerator the rpm's rise about 200 then settle down. If I should slightly press down the same thing happens. However,  when driving at a steady freeway speed, and holding steady on the throttle, on level ground I can feel this unlock/lock along with seeing the engine speed move up then settle down. If I engage cruise control on level ground it is worse and occurs more often. But, with cruise control on and there is a slight road incline there is no unlock or downshift. When I press hard on the throttle then it downshifts and accelerates fine.

 

Locking/unlocking and lurching; I do not recall the transmission behaving like this in the early years. The dealer says if it doesn't throw a code then it is operating normally. I can see that there are times when it should unlock such as when under load, but should it be this happening this frequently and be so noticeable? Or maybe I am being too sensitive?

 

Anybody experience the same thing? Is this normal transmission behavior?

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

Doesn't sound normal to me. My opinion says that this torque converter is on it's way out too. It just hasn't gotten bad enough to start throwing codes yet.

  • Like 1
rviscuso Enthusiast

rviscuso

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks guys. I purchased the truck on July 2, 2017. With less than 52,000 miles and less than five years have gone by the drivetrain is still under warranty.

 

How do I get what so far has been a reluctant dealer to take action?

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, rviscuso said:

Thanks guys. I purchased the truck on July 2, 2017. With less than 52,000 miles and less than five years have gone by the drivetrain is still under warranty.

 

How do I get what so far has been a reluctant dealer to take action?

 

 

Get them to have a tech or advisor ride with you and show them what its doing.  Or, have them throw a data recorder on it.  That should be enough to at least get them to drop the pan.  

Edited by newdude
  • 3 weeks later...
Jx16ElevationEd New Member

Jx16ElevationEd

Posted
Posted

Same issue just started this weekend ...

96k miles on the truck.took it to shop metal on pan torque converter plate cracked. Faith full services thru and thru and now it will be $3400 for rebuilding trans and torque converter.. It's a bad issue in the 6L80s. Sadly the newer 8 speed gm trains issues have masked ours.. 

  • 1 month later...
Caleb Barrett New Member

Caleb Barrett

Posted
Posted

I will say there are better options out there than just taking it to a local transmission shop. When my 6l80 went out completely (I was out of warranty unfortunately) I went to 3 transmission shops, all of which were in the 4-4.5k price range. I ended up just ordering a remanufactured 6l80 which had the factory defects amended (supposedly) with free shipping to my shop for like 2600 bucks. Got it from what's now these guys, https://reman-transmission.com/transmission-codes/?code=6L80. Shop only charged 650 to swap them out so ended up saving some money and it's been a little over a year now without any issues. 

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted

Forget the warranty and put a billet torque converter in there with a new lockup o-ring.  Make sure Sonnax parts were used.  

 

B & I Torque Converters in Oklahoma City are well thought of.

 

Don't be held hostage by a warranty.

pokismoki Senior Enthusiast

pokismoki

Posted
Posted (edited)

the locking and unlocking converter could be the failure of the o-ring seal on the pump stator..  also a big failure point is the PR valve in the pump usually it wears out the lands on the valve, sheds metal, put a 200-300psi pressure gauge on the transmission and note the pressures compare to the specs from a rebuild manual

Edited by pokismoki
  • 2 weeks later...
rviscuso Enthusiast

rviscuso

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 4/12/2022 at 8:31 AM, swathdiver said:

Forget the warranty and put a billet torque converter in there with a new lockup o-ring.  Make sure Sonnax parts were used.  

 

B & I Torque Converters in Oklahoma City are well thought of.

 

Don't be held hostage by a warranty.

I found this on Sonnax. Is this what you referring to? 

https://www.sonnax.com/tech_resources/845-6l80-6l90-transmission-tech-advisory-consider-an-updated-converter-in-your-next-rebuild

  • Like 1
rviscuso Enthusiast

rviscuso

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I brought the truck in for oil change and transmission diagnostic. The short answer from the dealer is working as designed. The tech, 30 years experience with transmissions, drove the truck before the oil change then he requested we both go for a test drive afterwards. I pointed out when AFM kicked in/out and the rpm's moved; I could see the smile on his face. Yes that is normal. He went on to explain the balancing act between engine/transmission for optimum fuel combustion. These transmissions are constantly adjusting. I have faith that there was no BS here. No codes were present. His parting words, again no BS, was that my truck drove better than 90% of the trucks he sees in the shop. I will add here that they waived the $199 tranny diagnostic fee.

 

I have 43,000 miles on the TC replacement. With two months left on the warranty, I will bring the truck in for a transmission pan drop fluid/filter change. If there is excessive metal then we will discuss what action to take.

rviscuso Enthusiast

rviscuso

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I had the transmission serviced today; new filter and six quarts. The technician let me in the shop while the pan was down. The old filter inlet looked clean. The magnet had a collection of normal clutch wear material. All is well. I guess I'm getting a bit sensitive in my older years. He said to come back in a few years and get the fluid changed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...