Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Going to order the truck next month and trying to decide between black,red or the gray?I have had a lot of black trucks over the years and love it I’m just not sure all blacked out isn’t worn out on me now seems like there are soo many trucks like that on the road.The darker red looks nice with the raised hood being black and the black rims.The gray looks good to me also with the contrast with the black.Help me decide lol any comments will be appreciated.

Posted

Cajun Red Tin coat if they still offer it imo. It is by a far margin the best actual color option gm has had with their horrible paint selection you get with these trucks today.

 

spacer.png

  • Like 1
Posted

Cypress Gray is pretty slick on the Trail Boss.  

 

New 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Custom Trail Boss Crew Cab in Merriam  #T09344 | Hendrick Chevrolet Shawnee Mission

 

No photo description available.

 

Radiant Red is always a solid pick too

 

2026 Chevrolet® Silverado 1500 LT Trail Boss at Ken Ganley Chevrolet of  Aurora

 

 

Sterling Gray

 

Pre-Owned 2025 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT Trail Boss Crew Cab in Charlotte  #DCS6255A | Rick Hendrick City Chevrolet

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BIGDOGx said:

Cajun Red Tin coat if they still offer it imo. It is by a far margin the best actual color option gm has had with their horrible paint selection you get with these trucks today.

 

 

 

 

Radiant was last used in 2020.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

Radiant was last used in 2020.  

Ahh Radiant Red it is then for my pick. 👍 I do like that crimson grey though too, but that darker metallic red really pops in the sun imo...

Posted

I wish had the option for Northsky Blue Metallic (their best color) or a charcoal grey, but had to summit white on my 25 AT4. 

Sterling grey looks like a dull grey to me. 

Black is beautiful but a b**** to maintain.

Rams Delmonico red is 1000 better looking than radiant red in my opinion.

 

I think all of the color options on a Ram 1500 are better than what we get from GM. But not worth testing my luck over a color.

Posted

I have Sterling grey. It`s heavy metallic in it`s make up. It looks silver in the sun and a light grey on cloudy days. Nice color. I`m not a big red freak but, the Radiant Red looks nice. My buddy has a Radiant Red one. It looks badass when clean. It does show dirt easy.

Posted

One thing I'm not sure anyone's mentioned yet, Sterling Gray Metallic does an excellent job of looking clean, even when it's not. That may or may not make a difference to you. I almost got a Mosaic Black. I signed all the papers while they went all the way to the other side of town to bring it back from another dealer and it turned out to be black. I have a black Victory and I knew I couldn't handle washing my truck that often. They weren't happy with me that day...

Posted

I like chrome, but that's going away.

 

I don't like 'upscale' colors with black trim. An 'upscale' color to me is a burgundy, maroon, navy, dark brown, cream/pearl white. Typically, these 'upscale' colors would be more metallic and are better suited to chrome trim. 

 

Likewise, the more 'blue collar' colors, plain red, blue, tan, (summit) white, gray, less metallic colors are better suited to black trim.

 

This is of course my very subjective opinion. I'm also tired of the overwhelming majority of cars being white, black or something in between.

 

Be different!

 

My truck is white BTW

My next one will probably be red or gray

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...