Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Glad it's not a RED tag. :D

 

When I drove for WM, I got yanked by DOT and red-tagged on the spot! Had to have the boss pick me up.

 

When the trooper asks, "Do you mind if I use foul language?", in order to describe the condition of the front end, it's pretty bad. :lol::lol::lol:

Posted

Put around 400+ miles on the truck over the weekend towing the trailer with our two bikes on it. Left it in 4th gear and let her eat. She screams but that's where these engines make that torque is 3k rpm's and above

 

Crossed 78k miles on the way home. Me and dad were talking about getting another trailer so we can haul a lot of other bikes too so it'd be a gooseneck, about 30 foot deck or so. Which would mean one of us getting a bigger truck, guess time will tell [emoji106]

20a2d45870b47668d83fa4562fc8da3f.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Posted

What is it?

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

Safety inspection - usually done when you stop at a weigh station, but they can yank you at any time rolling down the road.

 

 

.....

 

She screams but that's where these engines make that torque is 3k rpm's and above

 

.....

That's right where mine starts making power too ... and starts burning oil. :sick: Just hope I have a lift when this thing finally grenades.

 

Nice lookin' toys ya got there CJ.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Safety inspection - usually done when you stop at a weigh station, but they can yank you at any time rolling down the road.

 

 

That's right where mine starts making power too ... and starts burning oil. :sick: Just hope I have a lift when this thing finally grenades.

 

Nice lookin' toys ya got there CJ.

Thanks, and yeah added 2 quarts before we hit the road as well. I don't get it, practically brand new truck and goes through that much between oil changes often

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Posted

I'm just amazed that GM doesn't see this as a problem. You'd think they'd have fixed this by the '08 model year ... but they just made them worse. :nonod:

 

Maybe GM should stick to building gliders, and let the customers choose the driveline. I'd probably buy another GM again if that were the case! :)

Posted

Yup, passing inspection. Got run down last week also.

 

Cops are after those campers haulers going 62 mph on the interstate.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks, and yeah added 2 quarts before we hit the road as well. I don't get it, practically brand new truck and goes through that much between oil changes often

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

I'm open for business...

 

How did that quad handle the water?

Posted

I'm open for business...

 

How did that quad handle the water?

Handled it fine besides the fact the belt started to slip, or the clutch went bad [emoji23] [emoji23]

 

Gonna clean it up today and tear it open, see what damage I did to the CVT system

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Posted

Got my oil analysis back. The trend confirms my engine's decline began a couple years ago.

 

90k miles! THANKS GM! Nice F#%&ing job on that one!! :mad::mad::mad:

 

 

The wear metals tell me it's more than likely the cam bearings - been seeing alot of those types of failures in these AFM engines across the net. Also piston rings add to the iron content, and pistons to the aluminum. Seems the aluminum content has gone down since I switched to 10w-30. Was high on my first analysis.

 

Glad I didn't use this thing to commute the entire 10 years I've owned it - would've needed an engine back in 2011! :sick:

 

fullsizeoutput_8a1_zpsii5qiran.jpeg

How long you been running Amsoil SS in your truck?

 

Posted

Since it had 40k miles. Ran Royal Purple before that since it had 2,291 on the clock. Always changed that at 5k miles or sooner. Alot sooner than it needed to be, that's for sure.

 

 

Couldn't do any better maintenance. Treated this one the same, if not better, than my old school 350s I've owned in the past, and this modern junk hasn't even come close to the miles (or the severe beatings) those engines had on them. I was in my teens and twenties in those days - the pedal spent most of it's time planted in the carpet! This truck was babied by comparison. It's a friggin disgrace! :mad:

 

GM has forgotten how to build an engine in order to save themselves some money. Maybe if they built the shit right the first go-around, there wouldn't be any money problems? HMMM! What a concept!! :eek:

 

 

 

Handled it fine besides the fact the belt started to slip, or the clutch went bad [emoji23] [emoji23]

Gonna clean it up today and tear it open, see what damage I did to the CVT system

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

You might have just got some water in the CVT cover. Just take that plastic drain plug out (see if any water comes out), then fire it up, and hold it at 3k or so for a couple minutes - that should dry everything out in there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...