Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

No need to downgrade to a GMT900 yet.

 

 

HaHa! I can honestly say I've never heard that one before.

 

 

Well, GM did eliminate some nice features that LT GMT 800 trucks had as standard equipment. Decent bumpers, body color fender flares, rear window defroster, automatic dimming rear view mirror, torsion bar front suspension on the 1500 4WD models, and much better quality inner door panels and cloth seats. On the other hand GMT 900 trucks benefited from the new front suspension to give them a car like ride, and the dash has been lowered for better view of the road . Also, the new 6 speed auto transmission is a big improvement. However, addition of the AFM system on the 5.3 liter engine negated the upgrades in my opinion.

Edited by pm26
Posted

^^^^ That's the craziest post I've ever seen. The bumbers thing is kind of true, but it's not like any of the new trucks have good bumpers anymore. The fender flares are also a matter of opinion because I never liked the body colored flares, I only was ever interested in the black flares. I don't know about the next two (auto dimmer and rear defrost) because I've never had either in any of my trucks. However, the torsion front end is most definitely NOT better than coil over that the 900 series uses. The 900's ride better, are easier to modify, stronger, and have less problems. The 6 speed is a huge advancement and the new 5.3 has more power. I own a 99 Silverado and love my truck, but I've spent a lot of time in the 900 series trucks and they're heads and shoulders better than the 800's. They ride better, are stronger, drive better, pull better, control trailers better, haul better, have much better frames, have a better quality interior and better cab space. The only thing my truck has on the 900's is better off-road abilities because of it's approach angle.

  • Like 1
Posted

ill take my 01 over any of that newer shit, i ran that mother ****er thru a fence and ditch (which it came out of in 2wd) going 50 mph and all it had was some body damage which me and a buddy replaced. It sustained no mechanical damage and still tracks straight as can be. I will never get rid of that truck

Posted

I replaced my water pump today. Its been leaking slowly for a while.

FYI the nut that mounts the fan to the pulley is 36mm. It took me two trips to two different stores before I found a crescent wrench large enough.

 

Tomorrow the axle seals go in.

 

I'm waiting for the fuel pump to go as well. 160k on the clock and counting...

  • Like 1
Posted

^^^^ That's the craziest post I've ever seen. The bumbers thing is kind of true, but it's not like any of the new trucks have good bumpers anymore. The fender flares are also a matter of opinion because I never liked the body colored flares, I only was ever interested in the black flares. I don't know about the next two (auto dimmer and rear defrost) because I've never had either in any of my trucks. However, the torsion front end is most definitely NOT better than coil over that the 900 series uses. The 900's ride better, are easier to modify, stronger, and have less problems. The 6 speed is a huge advancement and the new 5.3 has more power. I own a 99 Silverado and love my truck, but I've spent a lot of time in the 900 series trucks and they're heads and shoulders better than the 800's. They ride better, are stronger, drive better, pull better, control trailers better, haul better, have much better frames, have a better quality interior and better cab space. The only thing my truck has on the 900's is better off-road abilities because of it's approach angle.

 

 

Better quality interior? With plastic tool shed wall door panels and cheapest looking lint collecting seats imaginable? Don't make me laugh. And if coil over strut suspension is so strong, why did they retain front torsion bar suspension on 2500 and 3500 series trucks?

Posted

I mean not to offend anyone, but the 800's were the reason I drifted away from GM. I think they were a mistake, and one of GM's worst designs- it wasn't until the 900's that I even started looking at GM's again.

It's just one man's opinion though ( and a lot of my friends ), On my thoughts of GM over the last 15 years or so.

Posted

you can easily get a nbs duramax for 20k thats what all the ones on the diesel site im on go for my buddy just sold his nbs for 17k, this one had tunes and all kinds of mods as well. you shouldnt have a problem finding one.

 

545686_334020316668643_1785788473_n.jpg

 

430036_10150590910026051_1527186755_n.jpg

Posted

I mean not to offend anyone, but the 800's were the reason I drifted away from GM. I think they were a mistake, and one of GM's worst designs- it wasn't until the 900's that I even started looking at GM's again.

It's just one man's opinion though ( and a lot of my friends ), On my thoughts of GM over the last 15 years or so.

 

 

I beg to differ on ALL of that.. The build quality of the 900's will never be as solid as the 800's. With fuel economy requirements and such, the thinner and lighter materials make it impossible. In my opinion, the 800 series trucks are the best trucks GM has put out to date.

  • Like 3
Posted

I mean not to offend anyone, but the 800's were the reason I drifted away from GM. I think they were a mistake, and one of GM's worst designs- it wasn't until the 900's that I even started looking at GM's again.

It's just one man's opinion though ( and a lot of my friends ), On my thoughts of GM over the last 15 years or so.

 

 

I beg to differ on ALL of that.. The build quality of the 900's will never be as solid as the 800's. With fuel economy requirements and such, the thinner and lighter materials make it impossible. In my opinion, the 800 series trucks are the best trucks GM has put out to date.

 

Yes I agree with hockeypro, the 900's are nice trucks. But the 800's are still more of a "truck" compared to the 900 IMO.

Posted (edited)

A falling acorn denting the hood is the best testimony of solid construction of GMT900 trucks. I wonder what a pine cone would do?

Edited by pm26
  • Like 2
Posted

I can attest with grapes experiance these things if nothing else can take a beating. In 2008 I got hit in the driver side fender by a 2007 trailblazer. The tb was totaled, as in no front end left but a sledge hammer got everything off my tire and I drove home and slapped a grille and fender on and chained the bumper to a tree and pulled it straight. I now feel really safe driving this truck. Mechanically, well is 304,500 miles enough to speak for itself. Stock motor btw, transmission went last summer but that was mostly my fault.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I927 using Tapatalk 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was the GM of a Lincoln Mercury dealership back in the 80's. The service lot was always full with "broken" ones. Plenty of transmissions, power windows and a/c repairs. The only one I'd consider owning would be the Marauder at this point and it certainly wouldn't be a daily driver.  My 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate is my "Lincoln Town Car" in my retirement. I want all the "stuff". Big infotainment screens, one touch power windows, Supercruise (I won't buy another vehicle without it), hands free pretty much everything. I'm going to swap my current truck for a 2027 Yukon Denali Ultimate so I can have the air suspension and surround vision recording along with all the other "stuff". 
    • Yep mine is on backorder also.
    • The Denali Ultimate's grille is tinted, but the "regular' Denali has a bright chrome grille like the current models.
    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...