Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Do you have any picture of how the lens is mounted in the stock projector? I have some 2.5" safego projectors that have a way nicer output than the stock projectors. The only problem is that I do not trust that the solenoids will last that long. I was hoping to just swap the lens while doing a black headlight mod. If I can't then I plan on retrofitting these cheap projectors.

 

Here's a comparison of the two, hard to see with my phone camera, but the safego has a nicer blue line and a sharper cut off. Plus its output is way nicer and doesnt have as many hot spots.

 

 

Edited by projectsummit
Posted (edited)

Do you have any picture of how the lens is mounted in the stock projector? I have some 2.5" safego projectors that have a way nicer output than the stock projectors. The only problem is that I do not trust that the solenoids will last that long. I was hoping to just swap the lens while doing a black headlight mod. If I can't then I plan on retrofitting these cheap projectors.

 

Here's a comparison of the two, hard to see with my phone camera, but the safego has a nicer blue line and a sharper cut off. Plus its output is way nicer and doesnt have as many hot spots.

 

 

You can fit a 3" lens in both the Sierra and Silverados

Here's mine

6F0D5720-50AB-4C36-A442-B99AB3D54421_zps

 

And here's a comparison shot of the FXR vs 55W DDMTuning HIDs in OEM.

FXR on top and OEM w/ HIDs on bottom

 

A8463EF1-162B-41A8-8C5D-1FF24784F64D_zps

The FXR was aimed a bit low but I didn't have a screwdriver to adjust the height.

 

EDIT: if you do the retrofit and don't put halos, I think the beam would be a bit wider. Not much but it should still be somewhat wider cause the halo covers some of the lens.

Edited by Mike1220
Posted

I am referring to just changing the lens not the entire projector. Also your stock projector picture is very blurry, doesn't make for a great comparison.

 

I was under the impression that the stock projectors are 2.5"

Posted

The stock projector is more than 2.5 but less than 3. The ring diameter measures 2.85 inside and 3.23 outside. I know Spurlock took some pretty in-depth measurements of a borrowed stock projector in an effort to make some adapter plates for a RX350 Projector project. That may even be somewhere in this thread...

 

I haven't seen anyone change the lens on the stock projector yet. The thought crossed my mind, but I wouldn't know where to start part wise, and how good the bowl performs since it is made for a halogen bulb.

 

Good luck with your idea, and report your progress here.

Posted

I am referring to just changing the lens not the entire projector. Also your stock projector picture is very blurry, doesn't make for a great comparison.

 

I was under the impression that the stock projectors are 2.5"

 

What would the advantage be of just changing the lens?

Posted (edited)

The stock lens is horrible, would want a clearer cleaner lens.

 

The stock lens is mounted into a FRP "hat" from behind. The lens is retained by a second FRP piece that fits in behind the lens and it is retained by plastic welded studs, which could be replaced by screws or rivets. The "hat" is attached to the reflector and shield/shutter assembly by plastic welded studs which could be replaced by a conventional fastener.

 

As you probably know, the lens, reflector, shield, and bulb all work as a unit. A change to one of them is a result of the new combination. The profile of the lens is designed to compliment the profile of the reflector.

 

So, the reason I asked what would be the advantage of replacing the lens, is because once you have access to the projector, you can easily replace it with a projector that performs better. The hard part is access. Phil will have a bolt-in solution soon if not already.

Edited by spurshot
Posted

I've read through all of these post in this thread and I am still uncertain as to what I want to order. Although, I have narrowed it down. I have a 2015 Silverado with projectors and I am not going to do a retrofit. I am just going to buy a kit from TRS.

 

http://www.theretrofitsource.com/hid-systems/morimoto-elite-hid-system-silverado-low-beam.html?carDisplay=2015+Chevrolet+Silverado++w%2F+Projectors&preselect=RELAY-H11#.VSgA5a10wy8

 

The kit above I would imaging is what I need. I want it to be completely plug and play and reliable. If this kit is ok, what should I get 35W or 50W. I want white light with NO blue.

 

Also, where is a good place to get LED's for the fogs to match?

You can buy fogs right on our website if you want.
Posted

I did the same thing for my driver side at first haha. Only thing is you have the excuse of looking over the fender. I put my bulbs in before I put the projectors in my lights haha.

 

Finally got to do my retrofit and it came out incredible! Love the FXRs especially compared to the OEM projectors. After having 55W HIDs, 45W LMZs, and halogens in the stock projectors, I can say that NOTHING compares to the FXRs, I got 50W HIDs in them. Not sure which ones they are but they were some upgraded set from TRS, I think the XB35. My advice for anyone who wants to improve the lighting, just go for the retrofit. It's well worth it.

Also I want to give a big thanks to Dcarl for some help that I got from him while I was doing the retrofit and a big thanks to Phil from Fastheadlights for creating the adapter bracket, the bracket made the retrofit so much easier

Awesome man.! Glad it worked out for you. Got version 2.0 of that bracket done yesterday . Lol. Only thing different than the one you are using now is that it now allows for the rear install method and is just a bit smaller than the one you are using. Let's see some output pics big guy!
  • Like 1
Posted

The stock lens is horrible, would want a clearer cleaner lens.

I have already tried doing a clear lense swap to replace the fresnal lenses in the oem units. Honestly, the result is not worth the effort. Like Spurshot said, if you have done the work to remove the projector you might as well just replacer it with an FXR. We now have the bracket designed to accomodate the rear install method. When customers buy the kit off our site it is the new version. I should have the install document done this weekend as well. The new bracket was finalized this week. Thanks to Dave and Spurshot for the info/feedback needed to improve the first version of the adapter kit.
  • Like 1
Posted

Installed my TRS Morimoto HID kit into the factory projectors today. I mounted the relays under the radiator cover on the support brace just behind and to one side of the hood latch. The ballasts were velcroed to the radiator shroud.

 

The only problem was that the H11B bulbs were too long to fit in the headlight access cover. I had to cut the back of the cover box section. I used some 1.5" styrene stops to extend the box. JB Weld is my friend.

  • Like 1
Posted

Well I attempted to change the lenses or projector but those cheap 2.5" projectors I have a are way too small. I just ended up black out the chrome and putting them back together.

Posted

Anyone have issues with the Beam pattern with their HID's? I put a DDM kit in, and had the "Smiley face" issue so I rotated my bulb, and it took it away, but now I have a pretty large gap in beam coverage right in front of me. I have the 2014 Sierra SLT with Projectors.

 

Any Help is Appreciated.

Posted

Does anyone know of shops that do custom headlights? I know fast headlights does but they are not taking orders. Really want to get my headlights done.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...