Jump to content

2014+ Leveling Kits

bcazier

By bcazier
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

So i put my RC 2" level kit and Toyo 295/55/20's on this weekend. Install was simple, just like on my 2011. It definitely helps to have an extra set of hands when wedging that spacer in there. 295/

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

Thanks. Here is one more from yesterday. Considering we're getting 8-10 inches of rain the next two days, I won't be taking any better pics soon.  

FH212
FH212

Mine is finally done! After months of research I went with the RC 2.5" level kit front only, stock rear block. 20"x9" Fuel Nutz w/ +1 offset, 33x12.50x20 Toyo M/T tires. No rubbing, No trimming, yet a

Posted Images

nmyron Enthusiast

nmyron

Posted
Posted (edited)

Man that's Crazy. I appreciate the head up in advance. They guy at my shop said I could probably pull off a 285/55/20 but wouldn't recommend I go to a 295/55/20. He said he just dealt with a similar situation on the same truck. Out of curiosity, what size tire where you trying to run? Did you try your stock 275/55/20 with the level kit and still have issues?

Did you consider the rough country kit that combines the 2" level with the 1.25" body kit? They claim this kits is made to run 33s on 20s. Anyone have experience with this kit? I'm strongly considering it.

Stock 20's on the stock Contis, rubbed the sidewall on the upper control arm. During the realignment after removing the lift the tech pointed out that I, too, was rubbing the inner rim edges against the UCA as well as JJT suggested his brother was experiencing. Edited by nmyron
NEOutDoors Enthusiast

NEOutDoors

Posted
Posted (edited)

Stock 20's on the stock Contis, rubbed the sidewall on the upper control arm. During the realignment after removing the lift the tech pointed out that I, too, was rubbing the inner rim edges against the UCA as well as JJT suggested his brother was experiencing.

Oh Man... So the lift alone (everything else stock) caused rubbing due to the alignment change. That sucks! Looks like I need a new truck.

 

So the only work around is to get new wheels... spacers wont solve it?

 

What about going with a legit lift like a 4.5" or something?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by NEOutDoors
NEOutDoors Enthusiast

NEOutDoors

Posted
Posted (edited)

I just performed the 2" Rough Country lower spacer level on my 2017 with stamped steel arms. I have done several levels on GMT900's and K2XX's, using the upper pucks. This one was a relative breeze. I did not remove the tie rod ends, or unplug the rack. I only loosened the upper nuts, removed the upper ball joint, and obviously the lower two bolts. Everything was buttoned up in about a hour and 20 mins.

gm-lift-kit_13078-base.jpg

attachicon.giflevel.jpg

... have you had any of the rubbing issues that have been mentioned? I wonder if the difference in the 2" kit vs the 2.5" is causing rub issues.

Edited by NEOutDoors
Csjumper2003 Enthusiast

Csjumper2003

Posted
Posted

Oh Man... So the lift alone (everything else stock) caused rubbing due to the alignment change. That sucks! Looks like I need a new truck.

 

So the only work around is to get new wheels... spacers wont solve it?

 

What about going with a legit lift like a 4.5" or something?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

If you need new rims because of offset then spacers should do the same and fix the issue cheaper.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nmyron Enthusiast

nmyron

Posted
Posted

Oh Man... So the lift alone (everything else stock) caused rubbing due to the alignment change. That sucks! Looks like I need a new truck.

 

So the only work around is to get new wheels... spacers wont solve it?

 

What about going with a legit lift like a 4.5" or something?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

It's possible spacers would solve it. I just don't really feel like adding a failure point between my hubs and wheels. That's just more work any time I need to get in there, as you'd have to torque the spacers, then torque the wheels... Then the added complexity of figuring out how to stop the hubs from spinning while torqueing down the spacers... Then driving it 500 miles, pulling the wheels to check the spacer torque, then re-torqueing the wheels... That's 2 hours of a weekend that are much better spent elsewhere. I bought a new truck to have something I don't need to fix every few months. If I wanted to keep working underneath a truck I would've kept my last ride :-) There are plate spacers that are available from Rough Country, and there is a place called WheelTech on eBay that sells solid Billet plates in 6x5.5 for GM trucks in 8mm as well. Both are options, but in the thread where these were mentioned, the OP never replied as to if any long term issues were experienced with them. So, without some solid "Hey I've had these for 2 years and they're great" kind of reviews, I'm very leery of installing them. The last thing I need is to be hauling a trailer or going on a trip with my fam and lose a wheel cause my studs sheared off. Also, there is the added complexity of the fact that there is not a shop around that will work with them. If you have spacers, and have to have your brakes done or some such, the shops around me won't re-install your spacers per their company policy. They have to remove them, and leave them inside the truck for you to re-install after delivery. Again, more headache than I'm interested in dealing with. If the spacers are the bolt down variety, it's very possible that I'd have to cut the studs down to fit them under the wheels, resulting in the shop saying they can't put my wheels back on because my studs are too short, as well, since they can't reinstall the spacers before installing the wheels.

 

I'm sure a good suspension lift with new UCA's would do it. Their 4.75" is a combo suspension/body... Body lifts aren't true lifts however, they offer no advantage in the real world except to lift the body off the frame, and require in this case adding brackets to relocate parts from the factory locations. I'd probably opt for the 5" suspension lift. But then again, it's $1300 :-) And I don't need 5" more ground clearance, or the reduced gas mileage inherent in blowing the current setup's aerodynamics by jacking it up that high off the ground and the added underbody positive air pressure. I'd be more likely to pick up some stock-alike wheels with a higher offset if I were to go back to it. But, honestly, now that it's out, I'm not interested. If anything, I'm a little upset at myself for wasting the money in the first place. It just seemed like a good idea at the time, and a cheaper alternative to new wheels and/or a full lift kit. But, as I already knew all too well, cheaper is not always better.

 

Some people are having great luck with this stuff, but I note that the majority of those folks also sprung for new, higher-offset wheels and larger tires. I was hoping to keep everything stock but the front ride height. But that doesn't seem in the cards for me. I bought the Sierra for the look, the mileage, and some other things like integrated trailer brake controller and such. I could've gotten a lifted one off the lot, as my dealership sells models that have lifts pre-installed. Next time I buy, I might consider that instead. That way it's already done for me, and I don't have to get into it on my own. You live, you learn I guess :-)

2017SierraSLT Senior Enthusiast

2017SierraSLT

Posted
Posted

... have you had any of the rubbing issues that have been mentioned? I wonder if the difference in the 2" kit vs the 2.5" is causing rub issues.

 

 

No rubbing whatsoever, but I am running the stock tires until they wear out.

  • Like 1
DanZ71 Enthusiast

DanZ71

Posted
Posted

Man that's Crazy. I appreciate the head up in advance. They guy at my shop said I could probably pull off a 285/55/20 but wouldn't recommend I go to a 295/55/20. He said he just dealt with a similar situation on the same truck. Out of curiosity, what size tire where you trying to run? Did you try your stock 275/55/20 with the level kit and still have issues?

Did you consider the rough country kit that combines the 2" level with the 1.25" body kit? They claim this kits is made to run 33s on 20s. Anyone have experience with this kit? I'm strongly considering it.

Who makes a 1.25" body lift for 2017 silverado?

mrhonestlyinsane Enthusiast

mrhonestlyinsane

Posted
Posted

Nmyron,

What you are talking about makes no sense. I ran the rough country kit 2inch with stock rims and tires with no issue. Nothing gets changed with steering geometry. Basically all you are changing is ride height by lengthening the strut.

So if you took the stock truck and jacked it up with a jack you have the same affect. All that should have changed is camber. If everything is stock except the level nothing should rub. I ran a 275/65r20 on my level and had no rubbing except the fender liner which gets tied back.

I know the 2017 trucks got different uca's but it shouldn't matter. If a level caused a rub I think it will rub without the level also.

KurtA Enthusiast

KurtA

Posted
Posted

Finally installed a Motofab 2" leveling kit on my shortbed two-door. Truck still has 1-1/4" of forward bias.

post-174092-0-49186100-1505046772_thumb.jpeg

post-174092-0-49186100-1505046772_thumb.jpeg

post-174092-0-49186100-1505046772_thumb.jpeg

post-174092-0-49186100-1505046772_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 1
GoBlue2014LT Enthusiast

GoBlue2014LT

Posted
Posted

Finished the level by swapping the rear blocks and getting alignment.

 

Stock

2.5" front level

Swapped rear blocks (1" lift)

 

65d2aabfb281a5099d0a17cd40b86d8c.jpg

 

Wheels and tires soon

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

STINSAN3 Senior Enthusiast

STINSAN3

Posted
Posted

Finished the level by swapping the rear blocks and getting alignment.

 

Stock

2.5" front level

Swapped rear blocks (1" lift)

 

65d2aabfb281a5099d0a17cd40b86d8c.jpg

 

Wheels and tires soon

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Where did you het the block at? That looks perfect.

I got the 2.5 Motofab one too, haven't installed it.

GoBlue2014LT Enthusiast

GoBlue2014LT

Posted
Posted

 

Where did you het the block at? That looks perfect.

I got the 2.5 Motofab one too, haven't installed it.

Came as a kit on Amazon

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nmyron Enthusiast

nmyron

Posted
Posted

Nmyron,

What you are talking about makes no sense. I ran the rough country kit 2inch with stock rims and tires with no issue. Nothing gets changed with steering geometry. Basically all you are changing is ride height by lengthening the strut.

So if you took the stock truck and jacked it up with a jack you have the same affect. All that should have changed is camber. If everything is stock except the level nothing should rub. I ran a 275/65r20 on my level and had no rubbing except the fender liner which gets tied back.

I know the 2017 trucks got different uca's but it shouldn't matter. If a level caused a rub I think it will rub without the level also.

I appreciate your opinion. But I am back to bone stock, and I have no wheel or tire contact at my UCA after removing the lift. The act of lengthening the strut does change the steering geometry. If it didn't, there would be no need for realignment to reset the camber. The act of shifting the lower control arm down with the spacers moves the spindle down, which in turn requires moving the UCA down. All this is a change from the stock steering geometry.

 

When you install these lifts, you have to use a prybar to pull the UCA down so the balljoint reinserts into the upper ball joint through hole in the spindle. This is not necessary without the lift, because the spindle returns to it's stock height. I am able to lift the spindle into place with a jack and pin it in place with out a prybar. Without the lift, geometry returns to normal.

 

As I said, I'm not guaranteeing anything. Simply sharing my experience. Maybe you have had little to no need to drive at steering lock, or maybe your camber kit setup on your truck was a bit different. I can't speak to that. What I can speak to are the polished spots on my UCA's and the back edges of my wheels where my tire and wheel made contact while pulling in/out my driveway. I live on a narrow street, with a double car drive, and have to take the truck to lock to make the turn onto my driveway skirt. This is where I found the rub. Others can also speak to this same experience per the posts I have linked.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...