Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Truck looks great man! I have a '17 LT Z71 with 18's and want to do the same set up.  I plan to do the same Moto Fab leveling kit, but do Nitto ridge grapplers instead.  Can you send some more pictures with the wheels turned each direction to show clearance?  Also, are running wheel spacers at all?

I’d like to see more pics as well. My buddy runs 2.5 on some 295/70 mts. Tight fit but no rub after pulling back carpet liner.
61f4dddfce8a98b16c80e1d9aa3070c5.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Ryan Z71 said:

Do you have the sdhq skid plate026CEBCB-895A-4670-A318-67B8F34A2A6F.thumb.jpeg.5f0ffb1637e2feaab35303e097d473c7.jpeg

Nice truck.

 

Yes I do, SDHQ skid plate without the tow hook cutouts. I will be getting it powder coated to change up the look a little bit. 

IMG_6474.PNG

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, BIGRED811 said:

Nice truck.

 

Yes I do, SDHQ skid plate without the tow hook cutouts. I will be getting it powder coated to change up the look a little bit. 

IMG_6474.PNG

Looked in to that too. For now I like the contrast. 

Posted
Looked in to that too. For now I like the contrast. 


I'd love one of these, but the $500 is a hard pill to swallow


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
6 hours ago, spenpet said:

He's back!  missed these pics...did you ditch the chevy or do you have both?

I sold the Silverado for a ZR2. Which I got rid of a few months later. Picked up this rig to ride around in for a little bit.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

2" Rough Country kit w/ 2" rear block and 285/70-17 KO2s on 17x9 et-6 Pro Comps:

 

 

80-thumbnail_img_4497_c5c9069c9d2448a857

 

80-thumbnail_img_4498_dbcd35b409e8178d52

 

80-thumbnail_img_4500_693ca30b348dfbfb46

Edited by SNAFU88
  • Like 3
Posted
On 5/8/2019 at 2:48 PM, Crazy Schooner said:

I sold the Silverado for a ZR2. Which I got rid of a few months later. Picked up this rig to ride around in for a little bit.

ZR2 too small? or just didn't like it?

Posted
17 hours ago, jgraves13 said:


Any reason you went with a smaller tire?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I bought the wheels and tires together from a buddy, told me I can't do 35's without lifting it way more. And lifting it way more it rode like shit...

 

 

So I am not sure what to do.

 

Posted
I bought the wheels and tires together from a buddy, told me I can't do 35's without lifting it way more. And lifting it way more it rode like shit...
 
 
So I am not sure what to do.
 


Just depends on how much you want to trim. Seen multiple trucks with 35s on just a leveling kit, your spindles look like they put you close to 4". You could go with a 305/70 or a 285/75 and bet both would need minimal trimming if at all


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
7 hours ago, spenpet said:

ZR2 too small? or just didn't like it?

Couple issues with it, but I bought a CC/SB and I really didn't like the combo after a few months. If I bought an extended cab, I would still be driving it. Plus I hated how GM made some bigger interior changes to the 2019 models (heated steering wheel, better screen/backup camera). I just felt kinda ripped off.

Posted
10 hours ago, Ge0rge said:

Nfab or Havoc nerf bars?

Just FYI, they're the same. When I was researching my rails (went with Westin HDX), Havoc was on backorder and they actually told me on the phone to buy the Nfabs because they're the same rail. Nfab and Havoc are sister companies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...