Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Dinner said:

I'm calling tomorrow to be sure. 

 

From my understanding from their site and a few others is every 16.5-18 is as follows

 

4WD - Alum spindles & steel arms 

2WD - Iron spindles & steel arms

 

Someone correct me if I've got that wrong... 

I am wrong, slightly. 

 

lovelessjl was right. Alum and stamped share the same ball joints, no matter if it's a alum or cast iron spindle. Belltech said I'm good to go!

 

Struts and shocks are in. Just waiting for the spindles and flip kit. Will post pics when it's done! Thanks for all the help

Edited by Dinner
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I put the transmission spacers in yesterday. The shaking on take off is gone now. DSC_0995.thumb.JPG.95dfaf039c9717d019cb921a04663812.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, qwank said:

I put the transmission spacers in yesterday. The shaking on take off is gone now. DSC_0995.thumb.JPG.95dfaf039c9717d019cb921a04663812.JPG

Whats thr part number. Maybe i should do it to

Posted
54 minutes ago, Nasty said:

Whats thr part number. Maybe i should do it to

6521-774

 

it's literally longer bolts and 4 spacers.  you could probably stack some washers 3/4'' and get the same results.  

Posted

my crew cab got a little more frame clearance over the weekend. the rekles kit is amazing and highly suggested if anyone is looking for a notch. yes i did undercoat the rest of the frame so everyone knows. just did the notch first because it was bare metal and it looked like rain.

 

fMor1Q2.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
Will it work with a 2/4 flip kit? Do you have a part number and how much are you looking to get?

Not sure if someone’s answered you yet, but you can use the McG helper bag kit, you’ll just need to get a 2” airbag spacer from Firestone. That’s what I did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Anyone running a 285/50R20 or a 31-31.5" tire on a 4/7 drop? Any rubbing? 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Dinner said:

Anyone running a 285/50R20 or a 31-31.5" tire on a 4/7 drop? Any rubbing? 

Therewill be rubbing for sure

Posted
10 minutes ago, Dinner said:

Anyone running a 285/50R20 or a 31-31.5" tire on a 4/7 drop? Any rubbing? 

Therewill be rubbing for sure

Posted

Need some input ASAP.  I finally pulled the trigger on getting my truck lowered.  I am having a reputable local shop install an Inez 3/5 lowering kit.  The front is looking good, though I am getting some rub.  I thought this might be the case and expected it.  What I didn't expect is that the rear is coming out an 1" to 1.5" lower than the front.  On top of that the shop told me that even with the bump stops completely removed the truck is bottoming out on anything more than a small bump.  The rear was only supposed to drop 5" and apparently it is dropping more than like 7".  The shop installed the flip kit , 1" lift shackles and included shocks.  Anyone have any issues like this with a flip kit?

  IMG_4609.thumb.jpg.b477953a2e48a21e1eed4b6f76e48737.jpg

IMG_4608.jpg

IMG_4607.jpg

Posted
Anyone running a 285/50R20 or a 31-31.5" tire on a 4/7 drop? Any rubbing? 
Nasty is right. I'm running a 305/40/22 which is a 31.5x12 and I have some light rubbing at 4/6

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
Need some input ASAP.  I finally pulled the trigger on getting my truck lowered.  I am having a reputable local shop install an Inez 3/5 lowering kit.  The front is looking good, though I am getting some rub.  I thought this might be the case and expected it.  What I didn't expect is that the rear is coming out an 1" to 1.5" lower than the front.  On top of that the shop told me that even with the bump stops completely removed the truck is bottoming out on anything more than a small bump.  The rear was only supposed to drop 5" and apparently it is dropping more than like 7".  The shop installed the flip kit , 1" lift shackles and included shocks.  Anyone have any issues like this with a flip kit?
  IMG_4609.thumb.jpg.b477953a2e48a21e1eed4b6f76e48737.jpg
IMG_4608.thumb.jpg.2b741d5306592a151869d1728967e054.jpg
IMG_4607.thumb.jpg.905e7735f0134e9440b203114f80f211.jpg
You're definitely lower than 3/5 looks more like 4/7 to me. Here's my truck at 4/6d3947f7050dd3ad5bdc263eb1c0c2757.jpg

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted

Running the 4/6 IHC at 5/6 and that looks close to mine running 22's with a 305/45 tire. My rear bottoms out but typically only on speed bumps I take too fast or big dips in our shitty CA roads. 

 

I would verify the shackles they sent just in case. They should be shorter than stock, not longer. If they're longer they probably sent you the 7" rear flip. Hit up Ivan and double-check your order. The flip is the hard part. Swapping the shackles is pretty quick process. IHC are a good bunch of guys and will make it right if something is wrong. 

 

0g0TwPT9bRK5MM-vj3WHI4UU7dioObUIJqcRkfxV

Posted
1 hour ago, UofAZCats said:

Need some input ASAP.  I finally pulled the trigger on getting my truck lowered.  I am having a reputable local shop install an Inez 3/5 lowering kit.  The front is looking good, though I am getting some rub.  I thought this might be the case and expected it.  What I didn't expect is that the rear is coming out an 1" to 1.5" lower than the front.  On top of that the shop told me that even with the bump stops completely removed the truck is bottoming out on anything more than a small bump.  The rear was only supposed to drop 5" and apparently it is dropping more than like 7".  The shop installed the flip kit , 1" lift shackles and included shocks.  Anyone have any issues like this with a flip kit?

  IMG_4609.thumb.jpg.b477953a2e48a21e1eed4b6f76e48737.jpg

IMG_4608.jpg

IMG_4607.jpg

Did you use lift hangets or just a flip kit ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...