Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm not really feeling it...

The thing is the middle chrome trim around the headlights would just stop so it wouldn't look right. I think for that to look right would be if you plastidipped the whole chrome grille surround and the chrome on the headlights.

Looks horrible, it needs to be all or nothing.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

I agree it looks rough if it just stops at the headlights which is the problem I have with the aftermarket grilles that I've seen and the reason I don't want to do the whole thing is I'm afraid it will look like the lower trim levels. Thanks guys. Back to the drawing board...
Posted

I agree it looks rough if it just stops at the headlights which is the problem I have with the aftermarket grilles that I've seen and the reason I don't want to do the whole thing is I'm afraid it will look like the lower trim levels. Thanks guys. Back to the drawing board...

Paint match the front end. If you take the pieces off it only be a few hundred bucks.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

I agree it looks rough if it just stops at the headlights which is the problem I have with the aftermarket grilles that I've seen and the reason I don't want to do the whole thing is I'm afraid it will look like the lower trim levels. Thanks guys. Back to the drawing board...

Ok so your first rendering didn't work out, no worries, I thought about it and have an idea that may spark something for you. If you want black but don't want it to appear cheap like a work truck or lesser trim level I was thinking color match the bumper in that awesome red and black chrome the grille and headlight surrounds. Of course color match the rear bumper as well. But if you're not completely stuck on plasti dipping I think it would look sick and would give you the black look without looking like a downgrade

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Ok so your first rendering didn't work out, no worries, I thought about it and have an idea that may spark something for you. If you want black but don't want it to appear cheap like a work truck or lesser trim level I was thinking color match the bumper in that awesome red and black chrome the grille and headlight surrounds. Of course color match the rear bumper as well. But if you're not completely stuck on plasti dipping I think it would look sick and would give you the black look without looking like a downgrade

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That would look really good and be one of kind. Black chrome would be easy since he already has chrome. So they would just spray a black top coat and clear and you'd see the chrome shine through. Great idea.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Ok so your first rendering didn't work out, no worries, I thought about it and have an idea that may spark something for you. If you want black but don't want it to appear cheap like a work truck or lesser trim level I was thinking color match the bumper in that awesome red and black chrome the grille and headlight surrounds. Of course color match the rear bumper as well. But if you're not completely stuck on plasti dipping I think it would look sick and would give you the black look without looking like a downgrade

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Something like this but burgundy instead of silver. I like it

 

 

post-161014-0-44088900-1477068662_thumb.jpg

post-161014-0-44088900-1477068662_thumb.jpg

post-161014-0-44088900-1477068662_thumb.jpg

post-161014-0-44088900-1477068662_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I'd vote for color match.

Yeah if this doesn't work out I'm definitely gonna color match it. Maybe leave the grille chrome like the high country

Posted

Yeah if this doesn't work out I'm definitely gonna color match it. Maybe leave the grille chrome like the high country

 

I actually want to keep the chrome around the grille and headlights. I just want to get rid of the chrome bumpers. Well my idea would be to have them black chrome so it color matches and has the chrome look and durability.

Posted

 

I actually want to keep the chrome around the grille and headlights. I just want to get rid of the chrome bumpers. Well my idea would be to have them black chrome so it color matches and has the chrome look and durability.

 

Same here getting rid of the chrome bumpers no matter what I do with the grille

Posted

Something like this but burgundy instead of silver. I like it

 

 

attachicon.gifIMG_7524.JPG

That truck looks nice....

Posted

Installed the Gen5DIY Led override. Now this thing stayed bright with the headlight on. :D

20161021_160132_zpsn9ud6kna.jpg

20161021_160127_zpsandcblof.jpg

 

Also tinted the Fogs with yellow tint. Loving it!!

 

 

20161021_163208_zpsilvz61rw.jpg

20161021_163247_zpshrbuzqjv.jpg

20161021_163257_zpsfbsa35vz.jpg

  • Like 8

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...