Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Combined 100k & 150 k service

Powerstop pads & rotors all around

New plugs & wires

Flush cooling system

Flush brake system

Flush Tranny

Flush Diff

  • Like 1
Posted
Also got the waste gate (my version of exhaust cutout) opening at 8PSI. Did a little quick pull. Its a lot raspier than I expected. The boost did dropped a little bit from what I can tell on the gauge, about 0.5-1psi.
888e1428203e723dfca6b8975fdfa70b.jpg





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's a sweet setup.
My first Duramax twenty years ago scared the shitte out of me when the wastegate opened the first time I poured the coal to it.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I was under the impression that the wastegate relieves pressure when there is too much boost to prevent a big kaboom.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.


Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Posted
Took her out for alil, crazy how quick the weather changed!!! 
BFDE0ADC-27D6-4664-BD84-98DCB98E3C1A.thumb.jpeg.1f3c26e821239ed4fd031583e1663d32.jpeg
I told you to get your longjohns ready.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

  • Haha 2
Posted

You don't see this often.
What do they do ? Salt the piss out it?
The can't have too many plows in Dallas.4e0be8f4b1b01e63632518e171d2260b.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, dieselfan1 said:

You don't see this often.
What do they do ? Salt the piss out it?
The can't have too many plows in Dallas.4e0be8f4b1b01e63632518e171d2260b.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
 

Yup been few years since we had this much snow ❄️ ⛄️ 

Posted
why would opening a cutout make your boost go down 

Wastegate is usually use to regular boost for turbo system.... I’m actually running a supercharger... which doesn’t use wastegate to regular boost. BUTTTT I’m running an aftermarket 3.5” cat and planning to up my power to about 750-800HP.... and 3.5” exhaust is too restrictive in my opinion for that power level... let alone the cat... it’ll be soooo restrictive with the cat. Soooooo I added a wastegate to relieve exhaust pressure right before the cat.

The boost (on the gauge which is tapped into the intake runner) goes down because it’s more free flowing. The easier the exhaust move, the less pressure will be in the intake side. But that doesn’t mean I’m losing HP... if anything I’m making more power.

It’s like adding a better flowing cam. Swapping a cam out will definitely drop my boost shown on the gauge. But without swapping my pullies, I will probably make another 50-75HP with boost gauge showing 2-4 PSI less.

Hope that clears it up. I know I’m not the best at explaining things. Sometime I even confuse people more haha.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I was under the impression that the wastegate relieves pressure when there is too much boost to prevent a big kaboom.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.


Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk



That is correct if I’m running a turbo. I added a wastegate using it more like a cutout and relieves exhaust “back pressure”.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
12 minutes ago, dieselfan1 said:

You don't see this often.
What do they do ? Salt the piss out it?
The can't have too many plows in Dallas.4e0be8f4b1b01e63632518e171d2260b.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
 

here in Central California it's mid 60's low 70's the rest of ya'll freezing except Florida 

Posted
1 minute ago, dieselfan1 said:

Yea but you live in California emoji2957.png

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
 

lol, ya I wish I could leave this place but it's warm enough usually and I make a living otherwise I would be in Florida (maybe), Oregon is not to bad but no work there

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...