Jump to content

Used oil analysis - 2014 5.3 - GM Dexos 0W-20 6,219 miles


Recommended Posts

Posted

This is the first UOA for my 2014 GMC Sierra 5.3. OLM was at 19% and in service from January 2014 to April 2014. Mostly highway driven (around 85%). Engine is on its 2nd OCI when this sample was taken (first change at 6,900 miles and 9% OLM). Oil was changed at dealership and they used GM #19259487 (Dexos 0w20) and a ACDelco PF63 filter.

Main reason I wanted to run a UOA was to check for fuel dilution (which some DI engines are known for). Glad to see there was no fuel and flash point is still high. I would suspect wear metals (iron and copper) will trend downwards as engine breaks in.

 

14_SIERRA_SAMPLE_1.jpg

Posted

Are you running a Oil / Air Separator?

Posted

Thanks for posting that information. I changed at 3,735 miles (51%), and again at 7,512 or so (50% I think), so I'm not concerned after reading your report.

 

What do they charge you for the analysis?

 

I think I'm going to stick with my 3,750 interval until I reach 15,000. That will be 4 oil changes. Then I might stretch it out to 5,000 between changes, depending on what I read here?

 

Good information, thanks again!

Posted

Why 3750? I have been changing the oil in my GM vehicles every 5000-7500 miles since 2001 and been putting around 100,000 on them with no issues. Does nothing more than waste oil, granted you don't have to pay for the oil change for 4 uses but still a waste. Took my truck in at 5200 miles and had mine done.

Posted

OEMs have been using OLMs for decades now without issue and people still don't trust them. I don't get it. It's just a waste of money to change so frequently.

Posted

Older engine but I can chime in about the OLM. I run M1EP with the M1EP filter, I my intervals are about 10k going by the OLM which is what I use. I drive a lot of highway. If I drive mostly city for the month my interval is shorter, around 7500.

Posted

Are you running a Oil / Air Separator?

 

No not currently though I might add one at some point. Waiting to see how others go about installing them.

 

 

What do they charge you for the analysis?

 

Blackstone Labs charges $25 for the report plus $10 if you want TBN (Total Base Number). TBN is basically the amount of active additives that are left in the oil. This is only really needed when you are trying to extend oil change intervals and need to know how far you can go. Blackstone will flag at 1.0 or lower.

Posted

OEMs have been using OLMs for decades now without issue and people still don't trust them. I don't get it. It's just a waste of money to change so frequently.

Recreational Oil changing

 

 

The term "recreational oil changer" was coined to define people that change their oil far more than necessary because they actually enjoy doing it. It's easy to understand the psychology behind the recreational oil changing. It's the visceral feel of the tools, the victory when that old oil filter breaks free, the hot dirty oil pouring out, the joy of oiling of the gasket on the new filter, the clean clear oil going in, and the sense of accomplishment when you start the car, the oil light comes on for a moment, then goes out. For $20-30 in oil and filters, it's pretty cheap entertainment, but if people would be content to do it only when it provides some benefit to the vehicle, it would be better.

Posted

Another great place to have a UOA accomplished and a lot more personal tailored to your vehicle is Terry Dyson at Dyson Analysis. He sends back the report in a PDF and a .wav file with him explaining each and every wear metal and what it might represent. Plus you can contact him to ask questions. He is prior military and an all around great guy. I have been using his service for years now.

Posted

Another great place to have a UOA accomplished and a lot more personal tailored to your vehicle is Terry Dyson at Dyson Analysis. He sends back the report in a PDF and a .wav file with him explaining each and every wear metal and what it might represent. Plus you can contact him to ask questions. He is prior military and an all around great guy. I have been using his service for years now.

 

 

+1

Posted

Why 3750? I have been changing the oil in my GM vehicles every 5000-7500 miles since 2001 and been putting around 100,000 on them with no issues. Does nothing more than waste oil, granted you don't have to pay for the oil change for 4 uses but still a waste. Took my truck in at 5200 miles and had mine done.

 

 

OEMs have been using OLMs for decades now without issue and people still don't trust them. I don't get it. It's just a waste of money to change so frequently.

 

Recreational Oil changing

 

 

Don't worry about my oil changes, and I wont tell you how long you should wear your underwear. I'll change it when I want to, so get over it.

Posted

My first oil change will be before the OLM says so...

 

Why? I've always been stubborn, but I truely believe that at around 2K miles on a new engine you should change it sooner to get the casting media, material, and metals out earlier in the engine life.

 

It just makes "Me" feel better.

Posted

My first oil change will be before the OLM says so...

 

Why? I've always been stubborn, but I truely believe that at around 2K miles on a new engine you should change it sooner to get the casting media, material, and metals out earlier in the engine life.

 

It just makes "Me" feel better.

 

That's what I did,and it makes me feel better too. :)

Posted

I've been going by the OLM in all my vehicles since 1999. Regular dino oil and the interval is usually around 7-7500 miles. That's with mixed driving. On my newer vehicles that run the synthetic, it usually inches up towards 8000 or so. It's all a matter of personal preference, so either way is good for pretty much everyone.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...