Jump to content

Bilstein shocks thread

yanzhixiang

By yanzhixiang
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

yanzhixiang Enthusiast

yanzhixiang

Posted
Posted (edited)

So I've been researching extensively for the last couple months about levelling my 2014 Sierra. I was gonna use the popular RC levelling kit but happen to stumble upon the billy 5100 ride height adjustable shocks. Just when I'm gonna pull the trigger on them billy's, I discover the 6116 kit... For those of you who are unfamiliar with the 6112 kit. the kit come with a weaker spring and a 60mm tube body, so its quite a bit thicker than the 46mm 5100 shocks. and we all know bigger is always better( thats what she said! ). It is also ride height adjustable by using a snap ring like the 5100 series. Basically its the 5100 on crack and steroids at the same time.

 

With all the info above, I have a few questions I hope you party animals can help me with:

 

1. Would preloading your spring cause any suspension component to wear faster and eventually fail, particular the ball joint on the upper control arm?

 

2. Would the 5100 shocks last as long as the oem shocks under the same driving conditions?

 

3. Would a ~$700 price tag justified for the 6112 kit.

 

4. My truck is seriously underdamped with the oem shocks, would the 5100 correct that? What effect would the new shock have on my truck.

 

5. What did the fox say?

post-136081-0-94121000-1422246384_thumb.jpg

post-136081-0-81997200-1422246452_thumb.jpg

post-136081-0-94121000-1422246384_thumb.jpg

post-136081-0-81997200-1422246452_thumb.jpg

post-136081-0-94121000-1422246384_thumb.jpg

post-136081-0-81997200-1422246452_thumb.jpg

post-136081-0-94121000-1422246384_thumb.jpg

post-136081-0-81997200-1422246452_thumb.jpg

Edited by yanzhixiang
  • Like 2
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

bwilloby46
bwilloby46

I put the bilstein 5100s on the rear of my 14 High Country with a new 2" block a few weeks ago. Ride is unbelievable compared to stock. Liked it so much I got the adjustable 5100s for my front, remove

schloppy
schloppy

Hello, I'm not new to the forum but I just joined and figured I'd contribute to the community.   2016 Silverado 1500 "Z71" removed rancho's and swapped with Bilstein 5100's all around. So after d

Jullian is not my name
Jullian is not my name

I just got done with installing my 6112's on my 2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab.  Reading some install guides on here really helped, along with printing some Chilton Repair guide torque specs that I got from

Posted Images

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

First, the 6112 is not available for the gm truck yet.

 

1. Pre loading is not how a 5100 works. It just raises the spring perch. The truck raises along with the spring perch. The ball joint won't see any different load or angle with a 5100 shock, unlike a spacer kit.

 

2. Longer, many times longer.

 

3. Remains to be seen.not available yet

 

4. Yes, a 5100 will provide better ride and control.

 

5. He said "show me the money!"

  • Like 4
POS VETT Enthusiast

POS VETT

Posted
Posted

Raising/lowering the spring perch increases the spring pre-load. If the length of the shock body could be adjusted, changing ride height would not change spring pre-load.

 

I had never thought about the effect of spring pre-load on upper ball joint. My quick thinking is that spring pre-load by itself wouldn't affect upper ball-joint directly; unless the resulting lift or lowering pushed the operation range of ball-joint angle to the limit and beyond (too much lift or lowering).

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted (edited)

Raising/lowering the spring perch increases the spring pre-load. If the length of the shock body could be adjusted, changing ride height would not change spring pre-load.

 

I had never thought about the effect of spring pre-load on upper ball joint. My quick thinking is that spring pre-load by itself wouldn't affect upper ball-joint directly; unless the resulting lift or lowering pushed the operation range of ball-joint angle to the limit and beyond (too much lift or lowering).

 

Your statement is true. But only when the coilover assembly is not installed or the suspension is fully extended.

 

When the truck weight is supported by the coilover assembly, the raising and lowering of the spring perch simply changes the height. The force on the spring is only coming from one source, the truck weight. There is no additional force from raising the spring perch. The only way to increase the force is to increase the weight of the truck on that wheel (or an acceleration (bump))

 

The balljoint angle is controlled by the Bilstein 5100 by limiting the overall extended length similarly to the OEM shock. When you move the spring perch up or down, it does not change the overall extended length of the coilover assembly. That's in the Bilstein catalog.

Edited by spurshot
Jon A Senior Enthusiast

Jon A

Posted
Posted

That is correct. People commonly use that term, but that doesn't mean it's correct (much like referring to the coilovers as "struts"). The only thing preloading the spring when installed on the vehicle is the weight of the vehicle.

yanzhixiang Enthusiast

yanzhixiang

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Your statement is true. But only when the coilover assembly is not installed or the suspension is fully extended.

 

When the truck weight is supported by the coilover assembly, the raising and lowering of the spring perch simply changes the height. The force on the spring is only coming from one source, the truck weight. There is no additional force from raising the spring perch. The only way to increase the force is to increase the weight of the truck on that wheel (or an acceleration (bump))

 

The balljoint angle is controlled by the Bilstein 5100 by limiting the overall extended length similarly to the OEM shock. When you move the spring perch up or down, it does not change the overall extended length of the coilover assembly. That's in the Bilstein catalog.

That's clears out a lot! Thanks!

yanzhixiang Enthusiast

yanzhixiang

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Raising/lowering the spring perch increases the spring pre-load. If the length of the shock body could be adjusted, changing ride height would not change spring pre-load.

 

I had never thought about the effect of spring pre-load on upper ball joint. My quick thinking is that spring pre-load by itself wouldn't affect upper ball-joint directly; unless the resulting lift or lowering pushed the operation range of ball-joint angle to the limit and beyond (too much lift or lowering).

I was thinking the same thing, if the 5100 shock length is longer than the stock the preload would not change. However this seems unlikely because to compensate for the highest setting it would cause slack in the assembly when the snap ring is at the stock setting.

POS VETT Enthusiast

POS VETT

Posted
Posted

I'm hard-pressed to believe that the front springs are installed with zero pre-load; this situation may cause damage.

 

Adjusting spring perch would affect ride height but not in a linear way like a shock body with adjustable length.

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

The spring length with the weight of the truck on it is compressed several inches. Even the spring installed in the 5100 at the highest setting will compress under the weight of the truck until the spring reaches the same length and force as when it is installed at the lowest setting. It will have the same spring rate, no matter. You would have to change/alter the spring to change the spring rate. Pre-loading it in the extended shock a bit won't change the rate.

  • Like 3
goblue4016 Enthusiast

goblue4016

Posted
Posted

Hey question here - i have a 14 silverado ltz z71 - i use it as a daily driver.... The Ranchos are nice but i was wondering if there were other shocks out there that would provide a really smooth ride.. ive read about the bilstein 5100 and from what people are saying these are a great improvement..

 

i would like to level my truck also - so i imagine that the bilsteins are the way to go but figured i would ask.

  • Like 1
dcarl Enthusiast

dcarl

Posted
Posted

Hey question here - i have a 14 silverado ltz z71 - i use it as a daily driver.... The Ranchos are nice but i was wondering if there were other shocks out there that would provide a really smooth ride.. ive read about the bilstein 5100 and from what people are saying these are a great improvement..

 

i would like to level my truck also - so i imagine that the bilsteins are the way to go but figured i would ask.

I installed the 5100's in place of the Rancho's along with a Zone 2" leveling kit for the front and left the front shock at the stock setting because I'd read that with the 5100 at the highest setting (1.86"), some were saying the ride was pretty stiff. I can say the ride with the Bilstein's over the Rancho's is far superior. It's still firm but not harsh. I have not tried other settings on the front. I thought about taking out the 2" leveling kit and raising the shock up to the highest setting, but I'm happy with the ride and not sure I wan to do the work anytime soon. I have no regrets buying the Bilstein's though. They went on a truck that had less than a 1,000 miles and for the better ride it was worth the money.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
SMiller Senior Enthusiast

SMiller

Posted
Posted

Hey question here - i have a 14 silverado ltz z71 - i use it as a daily driver.... The Ranchos are nice but i was wondering if there were other shocks out there that would provide a really smooth ride.. ive read about the bilstein 5100 and from what people are saying these are a great improvement..

 

i would like to level my truck also - so i imagine that the bilsteins are the way to go but figured i would ask.

Night and day difference, install them in the highest setting, much more controlled ride!

goblue4016 Enthusiast

goblue4016

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the input guys - sounds like the Bilsteins are the way to go - a couple of my buddies are pushing me to go with the fox 2.0 shocks - a lot more money but they say its worth it, has anyone tried the fox shocks at all?

 

also my ultimate goal will be to throw a RC 3.5" lift on the truck in the summer - and i believe the kit comes with shocks, but I have no idea how good or bad they are??

  • 1 month later...
TotalAutomotiveLV Enthusiast

TotalAutomotiveLV

Posted
Posted

So I've been researching extensively for the last couple months about levelling my 2014 Sierra. I was gonna use the popular RC levelling kit but happen to stumble upon the billy 5100 ride height adjustable shocks. Just when I'm gonna pull the trigger on them billy's, I discover the 6116 kit... For those of you who are unfamiliar with the 6112 kit. the kit come with a weaker spring and a 60mm tube body, so its quite a bit thicker than the 46mm 5100 shocks. and we all know bigger is always better( thats what she said! ). It is also ride height adjustable by using a snap ring like the 5100 series. Basically its the 5100 on crack and steroids at the same time.

 

With all the info above, I have a few questions I hope you party animals can help me with:

 

1. Would preloading your spring cause any suspension component to wear faster and eventually fail, particular the ball joint on the upper control arm?

 

2. Would the 5100 shocks last as long as the oem shocks under the same driving conditions?

 

3. Would a ~$700 price tag justified for the 6112 kit.

 

4. My truck is seriously underdamped with the oem shocks, would the 5100 correct that? What effect would the new shock have on my truck.

 

5. What did the fox say?

 

 

 

The 6112 shocks were a nice improvement over the 5100s. Gives the big turck the shock it needs.

 

Check out how beefy they are.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • C/K Man
      Silverado 4500-5500-6500 are they still being produced? Would have sold better as GMCs as well

      By C/K Man · Posted

      There was talk over the last couple of years that the contract to build these trucks between GM and International would not be renewed.  International moved production of all their other trucks besides the companion CV model out of the Springfield plant some time ago when they opened their San Antonio plant.  That left Springfield only building the Silverado Medium Duty, International CV Series, and some Express/Savanna long wheelbase cutaways.  International also put the plant up for sale some time ago.  This all answered my earlier question as to why GM and International did nothing with these trucks since they were introduced, as they had basically become a market 'placeholder' with a finite life.    The Silverado Medium Duty/International CV trucks were interesting combination of a GM powertrain, electrical system, and K2XX Silverado cab with an International chassis that was supposedly designed for a step-van type vehicle they never produced.  They were manufactured in International's Springfield plant along with the IH MV series initially.  When first introduced, there was much talk that the Silverado Medium Duty/CV would eventually get a gasoline engine option along with other upgrades and GM and IH would work on a class 6/7 joint venture truck.  This was before VW bought Navistar out, after that happened no more was said.  Draw your own conclusions...   About the time talk started that the GM/IH joint venture was not going to be renewed, rumors started that GM would develop a new line of medium duty trucks themselves.  The story is the new trucks will be part of the next generation HD's due in 2028, and will still feature a 'straight rail' chassis design that the current medium duty has.  GM views this as a desirable feature that differentiates their truck from the competition.  A gasoline engine option is also expected.  As the current Silverado Medium Duty remains in production until September 2026 and there is still a lot of inventory available do not expect any official word for some time.   I believe GM remains committed to their successful partnership with Isuzu, and all the LCF models will still be available from Chevy Commercial dealers.  Isuzu is on the cusp of opening a new large plant in South Carolina and there is also speculation that this may result in new product for both Isuzu and Chevy Commercial dealers.                  
    • davester
      push to talk button

      By davester · Posted

      drive the truck back to the dealer and complain that the button works.
    • davester
      push to talk button

      By davester · Posted

      drive the truck back to the dealer and complain that the button works.
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      I have a 2026 2500 HD Ultimate. My phone app says there’s a software update available. It’s something about improved battery management and something to do with the running boards. I follow the instructions for the update but the “Check for Updates” option is greyed out in my settings menu. Has anyone else seen this? How did you resolve it? The help message just says “see your dealer” if the download doesn’t work. I’m just trying to save a trip. 
    • newdude
      Exhaust Question

      By newdude · Posted

      Fuel mileage?  That's all how you use your right foot.  Exhaust will give you sound.   Stock exhaust 5.3 is 2.75" diameter piping.     If the truck is nice and worth putting some $$ into it, I'd go for a Corsa catback.  I had one on my 2019 old body 5.3 and it was just perfect.  Zero drone, just driving around and cruising on the highway you'd think it was stock, but when you opened it up it was like a Camaro with the factory dual mode.  Corsa bumps their catback to 3in diameter.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...