Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Josh said:

We have strict rules that you continue to skirt.  Our moderators hide all postings that are not from Supporting Vendors.  They are just doing their job.

 

Directly from our site guidelines:

 

"Only Supporting Vendors, who have paid for the exclusive rights to advertise on this forum, may commercially advertise vehicles, products, and services for sale. Any commercial posting done by members who are not a Supporting Vendor will have their post deleted. We also do not allow any posts which solicit personal donations, no matter how worthy the cause."

 

This has been the rule for 15+ years. 

 

For the record, this company MRT Motorsports is no longer a supporting vendor and has not been for months.

 

 

I hadn't seen every post, but weren't they just being helpful and answering questions?  I didn't see any advertising from them.

Posted

Honestly as much I have seen them pushing business on here, Im not sure why they are not maintaining a sponsor membership.

Posted (edited)

I could careless about the sponsorship stuff...now all the updates on 6112s are non existent. :rolleyes:  

 

I get it...the forum needs to make money to keep in business.  But these posts I am SURE brought a ton of folks via search engine.  Literally the only thing that comes up on google -- and the thread has been deleted.  

Edited by aaronarf
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Have a 15 ecsb ltz 4x4 with 6.2 and leer cap, have 2"rake now,36.5 front and 38.5 rear, want to leave 1-1/4-1 1/2"rake for tow/hauling. Thoughts on bilstein 5100 set at top and a 1" block in back or 3rd setting an no block in back, stay with 275/55-20 tire. Worried at top height I'd only have 3/4-1inch rake and would be nose high with 2-300lbs in bed? 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Looking to lift the front end of my 2014 Z71 CC up a little bit and I am wanting to avoid putting any strain on any of the suspension components. I have read through this entire thread and I have seen that with the 5100 at the top setting they seem to ride a little bit more rough, which I am not worried about. The thing I am worried about is how they perform in the cold (around -15F temps)? Are they even more stiff?

Posted
Looking to lift the front end of my 2014 Z71 CC up a little bit and I am wanting to avoid putting any strain on any of the suspension components. I have read through this entire thread and I have seen that with the 5100 at the top setting they seem to ride a little bit more rough, which I am not worried about. The thing I am worried about is how they perform in the cold (around -15F temps)? Are they even more stiff?
I really think mine ride stiffer in the cold we've had in Michigan this winter. This is the first winter on these shocks.
The ride, for me at least, had become very choppy feeling.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
On 1/9/2018 at 10:19 AM, rozenheimer said:

Looking to lift the front end of my 2014 Z71 CC up a little bit and I am wanting to avoid putting any strain on any of the suspension components. I have read through this entire thread and I have seen that with the 5100 at the top setting they seem to ride a little bit more rough, which I am not worried about. The thing I am worried about is how they perform in the cold (around -15F temps)? Are they even more stiff?

Then leave it stock, any level whether with a spacer or shocks will still add some strain. The closer you stay to stock the better, so a 1.8" level will be better than those who go 2-2.5. I wouldn't worry much about it though if you are staying on the lower side and you aren't beating it up off road all the time (ie it is mainly a DD on the street) and you don't go overly large with the tires, weights or wheel offset then it should last for a long time before anything needs replacing.

 

BTW, good on you for reading and doing research. So many read a page or two if that then just ask a repetitive question as they are lazy so kudos!

 

Tyler

Edited by amxguy1970
Giving props for searching and reading
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, amxguy1970 said:

Then leave it stock, any level whether with a spacer or shocks will still add some strain. The closer you stay to stock the better, so a 1.8" level will be better than those who go 2-2.5. I wouldn't worry much about it though if you are staying on the lower side and you aren't beating it up off road all the time (ie it is mainly a DD on the street) and you don't go overly large with the tires, weights or wheel offset then it should last for a long time before anything needs replacing.

 

BTW, good on you for reading and doing research. So many read a page or two if that then just ask a repetitive question as they are lazy so kudos!

 

Tyler

Thanks for the response. As mentioned above it sounds like the ride is a little more harsh when it is cold. I just don't like the appearance of how the truck sits but I do like the ride quality of the z71. I'll most likely try to find a leveling kit that raises maybe an 1-1/2" or so

 

Usually I read these and other forums almost obsessively so I don't make people mad for repeating other things

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On ‎12‎/‎28‎/‎2017 at 9:13 PM, ESSGUY said:

Have a 15 ecsb ltz 4x4 with 6.2 and leer cap, have 2"rake now,36.5 front and 38.5 rear, want to leave 1-1/4-1 1/2"rake for tow/hauling. Thoughts on bilstein 5100 set at top and a 1" block in back or 3rd setting an no block in back, stay with 275/55-20 tire. Worried at top height I'd only have 3/4-1inch rake and would be nose high with 2-300lbs in bed? 

I have a 1" block in the rear with 5100s in both the front and rear, set at the hghest setting in the front. There is no ass dragging with 2-300 lbs. I'll try to get a pick of around 2000lb in the bed to show you that it is not drastic...

 

Yes, I know - well above payload.

3.jpg

1.jpg

2.jpg

Edited by tanner709
Posted

Sorry guys. I read through 12 pages of this thread and couldn't find what I was looking for. Here's my question. I installed a 2" rough country level with the stock Rancho shocks. The ride got much stiffer. I really don't like it. What way is the best way to go here? Would installing the 5100 on the stock setting give me a better ride? Or is there a different shock that would smooth me out? OR..Just remove the lift all together? Thanks.

Posted
Sorry guys. I read through 12 pages of this thread and couldn't find what I was looking for. Here's my question. I installed a 2" rough country level with the stock Rancho shocks. The ride got much stiffer. I really don't like it. What way is the best way to go here? Would installing the 5100 on the stock setting give me a better ride? Or is there a different shock that would smooth me out? OR..Just remove the lift all together? Thanks.

Any shock designed to run 2" longer than stock should improve your ride. They get stiffer for more control once taken outside of the designed normal ride area. 

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

While I'm hear, the 6112 kit still coming soon, like the last 2 years? What a joke, makes me want to buy anything else for allowing this to happen.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
15 hours ago, tanner709 said:

I have a 1" block in the rear with 5100s in both the front and rear, set at the hghest setting in the front. There is no ass dragging with 2-300 lbs. I'll try to get a pick of around 2000lb in the bed to show you that it is not drastic...

 

Yes, I know - well above payload.

3.jpg

1.jpg

2.jpg

thanks for the reply, i think i will set bilsteins at 3/4 in front, truck is not a daily driver and when it is used it will be either loaded with hunting equipment and dogs or towing 4 atv's.

Posted
1 hour ago, Crf450r420 said:

While I'm hear, the 6112 kit still coming soon, like the last 2 years? What a joke, makes me want to buy anything else for allowing this to happen.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

I've seen them listed as available within the last few days so they must be out finally.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,887
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    xdieselmechanic
    Newest Member
    xdieselmechanic
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 566 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
    • from another thread   Update...although the truck sometimes seems to idle weird and the transmission shift a little weird, I've driven about 7,000  miles and no issues.   However, the way GM has handled my rental reimbursement, the situation when my truck quit, and the recall in general has led me to this point...I have driven a GM vehicle for the past 46 years and unless I buy a C3 Corvette, this is the last GM vehicle I will ever own. 
    • There's some truth to the above, but also, she's selling fullsize trucks and bread/butter CUV's like hotcakes, meanwhile, extracting GM's pickups from the deep discounting sales game.   GM's stock has held its own during her tenure, and the more recent buybacks are delivering cash back to investors and signal confidence in their direction forward. Even with the EV losses.   GM is an example of a modern publicly traded company. The #1 goal of any publicly traded company is to deliver the most value possible to shareholders. Despite being a car company, building the best car isn't GM's path to delivering maximum shareholder value.   McDonalds doesn't make the best burger, or the best coffee.   I've mentioned in another thread, I really don't / won't ever understand Cadillac or Buick in a modern context. Both brands are completely dead to me. I'll cede that the Escalade is a nice SUV, but the brand and nameplate mean nothing to me, and GM will never persuade me to pay north of $170k for a gussied-up Tahoe or Burb. Other people don't mind doing that and that's their purview.   The C8 shares absolutely nothing in common with any other current Chevrolet or Corvette on the market. Since its introduction 8 years ago, it's developed quite the following. It did what other Corvettes couldn't do: reduce the average age of its buyer. GM has something there, and I see them investing in the car. They'd better not mess that up.   We've successfully derailed Grumpy's thread again, but I think this one is meant to be more of a random thought thread so a little wandering is probably OK.
    • Sliding doors ftw   Also, Sienna ftw as well.  The in-laws got a 2024-2025 recently when their 2019 sienna was totaled due to a deer back in June.  They've been getting 38-40mpg on the 65mph highway they live on.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...