Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On ‎8‎/‎23‎/‎2018 at 1:34 PM, jpmiami said:

so it would seat higher than the 2.5 the RC kit gives me? my truck has 75k miles on that kit and rides well. Just want a firmer better handling ride. 

First, let me say I don't know with certainty what might happen if you "stack" two "lifting" methods--in this case an RC 2.5 spacer type lift combined with setting the Bilstein 5100 on its highest setting (1.85" lift on our trucks).  I think it would lift the front end higher by a certain amount.  If you are happy with your current front end height, you could get the 5100s but set them on the "stock" height setting choice rather than one of the "lift" settings--there are four setting choices on the front Bilstein 5100 struts.  Or, you could get Bilstein 4600s all around which are stock strut/shock replacements that don't alter "lift."  I have never owned the 4600s but when I was researching all this lift stuff, guys seem to say they are fantastic and a good value.  

Posted
On ‎8‎/‎25‎/‎2018 at 8:45 AM, Sierra Dan said:

A little something found on the leveling thread Homeslice......

 

I wanted to correct a typo in my early writeup saying GM has "KBs".  I meant to say GM has "TSBs" and "PITs" that tell their service advisors and mechanics what to look for when a vehicle is altered and how a warranty might be impacted.  In this case, "TSB 09-00-89-016E" and "PIT 5403B" were the two documents I found that were relevant back when I looked into this matter.  They may have newer ones now.

Posted
On 8/25/2018 at 4:52 PM, Roscopcoletrain said:

Is the 4600 still recommended over the 5100 on a stock height truck for towing more often?

4600 and 5100 are identical other than one is painted yellow, one is silver.

5100 has a longer profile for extra lift vehicles.

You can use 5100s on stock height if you prefer the silver look over the yellow.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 8/23/2018 at 4:34 PM, jpmiami said:

so it would seat higher than the 2.5 the RC kit gives me? my truck has 75k miles on that kit and rides well. Just want a firmer better handling ride. 

You may be able to manage it with that combo. But anything more than 2.5in of lift will really mess up some parts. 

 

If you just want a better ride yet already have spacers. I'd check out the 4600s or use the 5100s at stock height.

Posted
14 hours ago, JamesAT18 said:

You may be able to manage it with that combo. But anything more than 2.5in of lift will really mess up some parts. 

 

If you just want a better ride yet already have spacers. I'd check out the 4600s or use the 5100s at stock height.

I just want to be at 2.5 like now just without bottom 2" rc spacer.. thinking 1.85 from the 6100 plus the .25 Rc top strut spacer and see how it looks.

Posted
On 8/18/2018 at 9:49 AM, 2009GMC said:

285/70/17 bfg k02

5100 on 3rd setting for 1.5” front lift. Rear stock block. Still have 1 - 1.5” of rake which I like for hooking up trailer or small load in back. 

 

I have about 250 - 300 lbs of tires and bed cover in pic. 

B0114CC5-C988-4F70-8604-4178DF879CE4.jpeg

Do you have any issues with the tires rubbing the upper control arm or fender well?

Posted
Just now, UrbanRage said:

Do you have any issues with the tires rubbing the upper control arm or fender well?

No rubbing.

 

Since my tuck is max tow I have steel upper and lower control arms.

 

The 17" GMT900 wheels are at least an 1" narrower than stock K2XX wheels, offset may also be different.

Posted

Upgrading the Factory Rancho Shocks on a 3/4 ton 2015 Sierra. I don't see much as far as the class of vehicle listed on these changes are the shocks the same on a 1500 as a 2500? If I were to put bilstein's on a 3/4 ton what model would I be using? I have not researched this much I'm just watching the thread a little bit with some basic little questions. Thank you in advance for any response

Posted

I've read through as much of this thread as I can but I'm sure I missed this somewhere.  I'm having some installed as we speak and I asked them to leave it on the lowest for stock height.  I actually like the rake and don't care to level it out.  After I get through a hunting season and figure out if I want some lift I may move them up a notch or two for clearance.

 

How many people are running the 5100's on their lowest setting?  If you did, did you end up raising it later?

Posted

I just traded in my 2015 for this 2018. On my 15 I leveled the rear but on this one I want to level the front. My first choice was to do it using a spacer but I think I've decided to go with the Bilstein shocks instead. Where is the best place to buy them from? Would I be able to do just the fronts and the the rears later and how hard is the install? I've done suspension work on my Camaro but never on a truck, especially not a 4x4. Thanks

IMG_5080 2.JPG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 387 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...