Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I have the 6112 kit on my 18 sierra 1500 now and method nv wheels sitting 0 offset 17x8.5

I'm kinda at a toss up for tire size. I'd really like to run 285/70r17 in either a toyo AT2 or Goodyear duratrac. Anyone running this combo in conjunction with the 5100 or 6112 set at its highest?

Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk

Posted
So I have the 6112 kit on my 18 sierra 1500 now and method nv wheels sitting 0 offset 17x8.5

I'm kinda at a toss up for tire size. I'd really like to run 285/70r17 in either a toyo AT2 or Goodyear duratrac. Anyone running this combo in conjunction with the 5100 or 6112 set at its highest?

Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk




You shouldn't have any issues fitting that size. I fit 295/70r17 on a 2" level with some minor plastic trimming.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted


You shouldn't have any issues fitting that size. I fit 295/70r17 on a 2" level with some minor plastic trimming.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hmm I hope so I'm running mudflaps and not wanting to trim anything

Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk

Posted
On 8/10/2019 at 10:22 AM, Sierra Boy said:

One question I have on 5100 shocks, front & rear...can you put them on a stock truck without lifting? 2015i 2500 HD Z71 GMC

 

Stock tires/Rims.

 

Sierra Boy

Sure can!  They are adjustable (front strut assy) 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, aaronarf said:

Sure can!  They are adjustable (front strut assy) 

Thank you!

 

Sierra Boy

Posted
24 minutes ago, mbatzel14 said:

Hows the ride since you have EXACTLY the same front setup I will have come this weekend? Truck looks amazing. 

Just did it a few days ago and haven't drivin it much. One thing that is annoying me is it pulls to the left for some reason.

Gonna bring it back and have everything checked/tightened/realigned.

Posted

Just purchased the 6112's for the front and 5100's for the rear to replace the worn out Rancho's on my 2015 Sierra All Terrain with 70K miles. My question is, I like the leveling kit that I have and the stance so can I just set all the shock's to the lowest setting and continue on with the leveling kit??

 

I also purchased Rough Country UCA's made for leveling kits to help with the angle for less stress. 

 

I purchased the 6112's through Battle Born last week on the 6th. ..what is up with their shipping T/A??

"Now Shipping!! 105 In Stock As Of 8/1 - Please Allow 2 Weeks Shipping from Bilstein"

Posted
46 minutes ago, BowHunter1 said:

Just purchased the 6112's for the front and 5100's for the rear to replace the worn out Rancho's on my 2015 Sierra All Terrain with 70K miles. My question is, I like the leveling kit that I have and the stance so can I just set all the shock's to the lowest setting and continue on with the leveling kit??

 

I also purchased Rough Country UCA's made for leveling kits to help with the angle for less stress. 

 

I purchased the 6112's through Battle Born last week on the 6th. ..what is up with their shipping T/A??

"Now Shipping!! 105 In Stock As Of 8/1 - Please Allow 2 Weeks Shipping from Bilstein"

They're about 2 weeks out as stated. I ordered on the 29th, and they shipped yesterday exactly 2 weeks later.

Posted (edited)

I just ordered my 6112s from the warehouse in Richmond BC. Said they'd be here tomorrow. I have a set of Readylift tubular UCAs to go with them.

Edited by BigAL-evation1500
Posted
2 hours ago, Eneerge said:

I ordered mine on July 18th and they still haven't shipped.

Dang...…….and you ordered from Battle Born Offroad?? Have you called them to check on the status

Posted

Bilstein took 3 weeks to send my replacement set(first was broken right out of box) to 4wheelparts. I even called them directly after week 2 came around and was told there shouldn't be any reason for delay as they had 30 units in stock. You would think a company that has been in business for over 100 years would be on top of their game a little better. Least I was able to speak with a live person.

Posted

So, finally installed my 5100’s up front so I have them all the way around now. The truck definitely rides more planted now and handles bumps and potholes and rough roads a lot better. I chose to put the ride height at the 2nd setting which says 3/4” avg lift. I think that’s right about what I got, at least between that and an inch. And I wasn’t looking for much. Never really been interested in lifting or leveling and I don’t mind the rake usually because I haul a big ATV or tow multiples on a trailer. but it seems like the gm trucks have more than others. So before I had just over 3” of rake, and now I have just under 2-1/4”.

One thing I definitely noticed tho is that the steering really tightened up. I did an alignment at the same time and that’s right on, but when I’m at full lock left or right, I also noticed the front of the tires are rubbing on my UCA’s now and didn’t before. And this isn’t all that much lift.

So my question is: Is that normal, and to be expected? And is that gonna cause problems for the UCA’s/ tires in the long term? If so I’m probly gonna remove these and drop it back down to factory height cuz I already don’t like the way the steering feels, and to do damage over 3/4” front end lift isn’t worth it to me.

Thanks for any info, peeps!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,739
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    JimmyB4
    Newest Member
    JimmyB4
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 842 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
    • Probably a one and done post, but do you have a CEL on the dash? Was having issues with my transmission, fortunately only a week, and it turned out to be the transmission harness. Valve body was in good shape, so new harness with all the sensors attached, new fluid, and filter. Seems to have worked so far?
    • Two interesting tidbits of information which are NOT related were just released.   One, regarding the possible thrust bearing issues / engine failures with the 3.0. Demonworks just did a segment in which they believe they may have found "a" or "the" cause of thrust bearing failures: A missing thrust bearing. If the engine doesn't have all its thrust bearings from the factory, the missing bearing can cause extra play which ends up destroying a nearby thrust bearing which then sends metal through the engine.       Of other importance, Lake Speed Jr released some interest information regarding oil weight selection for the 3.0. Comparisons of:   AcDelco 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w30 Mobil 1 ESP x4 0w40. Mobil Delvac 5w40   Spoiler alert: The Mobils are PAO Ester -base and the ACDelco is a Group III base. Mobil shows lower wear in their tests for similar weights. Additive packages between 20-30-40 weight ESP's appear to be the same, but only 0w20 is Dexos D licensed. Wear is even more reduced with 30 and 40 weight ESP although all perform very well and resist shear and provide very similar viscosities within temperature operating ranges in the 3.0.   There are even more surprises, so just go watch it.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...