Jump to content

How is your 4.3L EcoTec3 V6 Engine working out for ya?

The4thgearkid
 Share

Recommended Posts

djw88 Enthusiast

djw88

Posted
Posted

not sure if the transmissions are different than the v8s but a friend of mine has the 4.3 for fleet vehicles and the transmissions start to have problems around 120k 2wd single cab

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

corwest
corwest

Couldn't be more true. Most people who speak poorly of things on forums go searching for a place to speak that way. It's very rare you find people who are completely satisfied who go looking for a pla

Brian S.
Brian S.

I had the 4.3l with 4wd/3.42 gears Xcab last year, now have the 5.3l with 4wd/3.42 gears Xcab and agree with what you say.   In normal driving, the 4.3 and 5.3 drive largely the same. The difference

KARNUT
KARNUT

Unlike getting the 6.2 you can get the 5.3 across the board with very little upgrade cost. Then you factor in the added HP can go up to 380 on e-85 it's a no brainier. I have nothing against V6s I hav

Posted Images

BB68 Enthusiast

BB68

Posted
Posted
On 2/26/2015 at 7:12 AM, Brian S. said:

I had the 4.3l with 4wd/3.42 gears Xcab last year, now have the 5.3l with 4wd/3.42 gears Xcab and agree with what you say.

 

In normal driving, the 4.3 and 5.3 drive largely the same. The difference is when you put the pedal on the floor because that's when you tap into the extra horsepower and torque.

 

 

This is what I thought when I test drove one back in 14 or 15. At the time I was look a replacement for my wife's Impala as pickups retain more resale.

I think if a guy only towed a fishing boat, lawn mower, or it was a town vehicle the 4.3 would fit the bill. It was very peppy around town, but when I got out on the highway at 60 and hammered down was when I could tell the difference. My goal of hauling 4 snowmobiles at 75 mph or better from Iowa to Colorado wasnt going to be met.  

Imcrazy Senior Enthusiast

Imcrazy

Posted
Posted

I may have chimed in before but, I put about 32k miles on a 2014 Sierra SLE with a 4.3 and traded it in for a 2016 Silverado with a 5.3, I was not a fan of the 4.3, I mean it did the job but, it was under powered for the double cab 4x4 truck... Both trucks have 3.42 rear ends...

  • Like 1
Artie61 Enthusiast

Artie61

Posted
Posted
On 10/26/2016 at 8:06 PM, Dnt said:

I do not drive a 4.3 but was just scanning through the thread. I was curious how well the 4.3 trucks did on fuel mileage. I think the biggest problem with a TRUCK is it like trying to push a Brick through the air no matter what engine it has. Just not a lot of aerodynamic efficiency in the design LOL. I will have to say that I am not too upset with my 6.2 8spd after reading this, it is actually averaging over 20 mpg over its 8500 miles life so far. On a recent rip to Chicago a bit over 400 miles it averaged 25mpg (hand calculated at 24.8mpg so DIC is pretty much dead on) not babying it just driving the speed limit. Big ole 420hp V8 feels like it is just loping along with no strain at all.

My work truck 2 wheel 4.3 on fill up says 650 miles to empty, my 5.3 4 wheel drive 450 miles  to empty on full tank

WHITESSTOWPIG Enthusiast

WHITESSTOWPIG

Posted
Posted (edited)

Bought a 4.3 RCSB 3.23 axle but drove a 5.3 RCSB 3.42 axle before making a decision.Price between both trucks was the same but the V8 work trucks in my area were very low optioned and the power difference was marginal.Overall I can agree that for the $1000 up charge there is really no real reason not to get a 5.3 assuming the options are what you want but IMO the 4.3 doesnt really leave much to be desired.

Edited by WHITESSTOWPIG
captainzombie Enthusiast

captainzombie

Posted
Posted
Bought a 4.3 RCSB 3.23 axle but drove a 5.3 RCSB 3.42 axle before making a decision.Price between both trucks was the same but the V8 work trucks in my area were very low optioned and the power difference was marginal.Overall I can agree that for the $1000 up charge there is really no real reason not to get a 5.3 assuming the options are what you want but IMO the 4.3 doesnt really leave much to be desired.


My 18 Z71 5.3 can feel like a slog sometimes, so I can only imagine the 6 w/4.3 feels like being stuck in molasses from time to time.
Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, captainzombie said:

My 18 Z71 5.3 can feel like a slog sometimes, so I can only imagine the 6 w/4.3 feels like being stuck in molasses from time to time.

 

My '15 with a 4.3 and the 3.42 gear ratio has proven to be very predictable and never disappoints.  I am planning to get a 5.3 for the higher tow rating but my V6 responds well as a daily driver and when towing my current travel trailer.

  • 2 weeks later...
anelson2390 Enthusiast

anelson2390

Posted
Posted

I have been pretty happy with my 4.3.  Lowered on 22's I'm getting 20+ to the gallon, towing a car to Kentucky from South GA recently I averaged around 15 mpg, and the transmission got a little warm going through the mountain grades but overall she towed like a champ, only real thing I'm missing is the exhaust note but I'm pretty happy with the exhaust I have on it now, definitely no replacement for the nasty v8 sound though

towing.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • 5 weeks later...
Melvin65 New Member

Melvin65

Posted
Posted

I have a 2014 Chevy Silverado 1500 LT with a 4.3 and this engine performs surprisingly well. It accelerates quickly when I step on the gas just like my Tahoe.  While I do miss the deep rumble of the V8, I like being able to drive longer between fuel stops.  I don’t do a lot of towing so this engine fits my needs well.

  • 8 months later...
jshrubs Enthusiast

jshrubs

Posted
Posted

Had mine for a few months now (RCSB 4x4) and I have zero complaints so far! I use mine mostly as a daily driver to and from work and lugging my canoe and kayak around on weekends. The truck has never made me feel like I needed more power in normal driving situations, especially passing on the freeway. Not to mention, the fuel economy has been great. I've been averaging around 10-10.5 liters per 100 kilometers (26-28mpg), have yet to calculate by hand though.

  • 5 months later...
Dylansierra12 New Member

Dylansierra12

Posted
Posted

I have a 2014 Sierra 4.3, and I love it. Of course it isn’t a v8 but to be totally honest you rarely need a v8 unless you tow every day. It hauls my 4 wheeler in the 8 foot bed and a trailer with 3 other 4 wheelers no problem. Going up steep hills you may notice a difference between it and the 5.3 but nothing crazy. I have a big lift on mine with 35 inch tires and I honestly thought my truck would be a turtle and need a tune at the very least. But it doesn’t. It’s a fantastic motor. I will however say the exhaust note is not good haha. If you plan to do exhaust on the 4.3 consider just not doing it. It’s very hard to make these great motors sound good. (IMO) I was a HUGE sceptic of this motor when I got it, but I haven’t regretted it one day out of the 6 years and 70k I’ve owned it for. GM with the 4.3 is much superior to ford ecoboost. 

mookdoc6 Senior Enthusiast

mookdoc6

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Dylansierra12 said:

I have a 2014 Sierra 4.3, and I love it. Of course it isn’t a v8 but to be totally honest you rarely need a v8 unless you tow every day. It hauls my 4 wheeler in the 8 foot bed and a trailer with 3 other 4 wheelers no problem. Going up steep hills you may notice a difference between it and the 5.3 but nothing crazy. I have a big lift on mine with 35 inch tires and I honestly thought my truck would be a turtle and need a tune at the very least. But it doesn’t. It’s a fantastic motor. I will however say the exhaust note is not good haha. If you plan to do exhaust on the 4.3 consider just not doing it. It’s very hard to make these great motors sound good. (IMO) I was a HUGE sceptic of this motor when I got it, but I haven’t regretted it one day out of the 6 years and 70k I’ve owned it for. GM with the 4.3 is much superior to ford ecoboost. 

It is basically a V-8!  Love that engine......

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

Now at 108,000 miles. Pinion seal. Flex plate cover.

About as trouble fee as they get. 

Every time I cross a new marker someone drops a hate bomb. 

 

On 11/5/2018 at 4:45 PM, djw88 said:

not sure if the transmissions are different than the v8s but a friend of mine has the 4.3 for fleet vehicles and the transmissions start to have problems around 120k 2wd single cab

They just don't want to let you get to comfortable.

:crackup:

 

 

 

jshrubs Enthusiast

jshrubs

Posted
Posted
On 8/20/2019 at 8:27 PM, jshrubs said:

Had mine for a few months now (RCSB 4x4) and I have zero complaints so far! I use mine mostly as a daily driver to and from work and lugging my canoe and kayak around on weekends. The truck has never made me feel like I needed more power in normal driving situations, especially passing on the freeway. Not to mention, the fuel economy has been great. I've been averaging around 10-10.5 liters per 100 kilometers (26-28mpg), have yet to calculate by hand though.

Sorry I meant 22.4-23.5 mpgs, miscalculation!

YukonXL04 Enthusiast

YukonXL04

Posted
Posted

So I havent driven a 4.3 since the 95s s10 blazers were around. But i just cant fathom a 4.3 ever being good enough for a full size truck. 

Maybe if your used to putting around in a 4cyl honda, but if your used to trucks then your gonna want more power.

 

Granted I live in Texas, and I use my truck for actual truck duties. 400+ lbs of tools always in it. Towing trailers, boats and a travel trailer.

I own a 5.3 Yukon XL and it definitely feels like a dog compared to my 6.2 Sierra. Ever since buying that yukon I swore to never buy a 5.3 again. 6.0, 6.2 or the new 6.6. But I do use my truck alot. And honestly some of the stuff I do or tow probably should have me in the 3/4 ton market.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      I see where you’re going and I can appreciate that. Statistics can be misleading because of the word average. They say statistics show the average cost of a new vehicle is about 50k. The average monthly payment is close to 1000 dollars a month. That’s statistics for you. I know very few people who pay that. 
    • silveradosid
      Replacing 2.7L on 2021 Silverado with 2023 2.7L

      By silveradosid · Posted

      same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • Coastie05
      Replacing 2.7L on 2021 Silverado with 2023 2.7L

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Another 6.2L engine failure!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...