Jump to content

Headlight Illumination Issues


deputy

Recommended Posts

Posted

It wont be close to the output of the TRS kit .... but my point is the reliability of these HID kits .... there are some scary story's. .. and you don't ever hear about people having issues with stock lights.

 

Headlights seem to be the worse thing you could have fail ....

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Great news. Now if they could only do something about the paint.

Posted

Following this thread since I will be purchasing a Sierra this summer.

 

I'm not a headlight expert, but it seems the BCM reflash will be the key to getting the supposed "30% increase" in light output. No bulb alone is going to get you close to that. To those that get this upgrade, please post your results. This headlight issue has been the biggest reason why I haven't pulled the trigger yet.

Posted

Wonder if running slightly higher voltage (through BCM flash) on the "old" bulb would do the trick.

Posted

Specs on the new bulbs (as per the site ) I found as as follows:

 

Luminous Flux (lm) (at 13,2V) 1875 lm ± 15 %

(at 12,8V) 1700 lm ± 15 %

 

My guess, and I do not proclaim to be a math wiz or electrical engineer, is that the BMC flash will up the voltage to the new light, producing the target lm of 1700 on low beam and with target lm of 1875 lm at the high beam.

 

With the +/- 15%, the potential output on low beam is over 1900 lms, and with the potential lm output of 2156 lm on high beam this may help solve issues.

 

I do not know what the currently lm output of the lights we have, but I can't see GMC blowing this "fix" by replacing a horrible bulb with something along the same output.

 

 

My two cents

Posted

From what I can find, the original 9012 bulb is 1870 lumens. The 9011 bulb that many have retrofitted is 2300 lumens.

Posted

I believe this is for Sierra headlights which use one bulb. Low and high have the same lumen output.

Posted

So nothing yet or should we start asking our service peeps about it ?

Posted

 

No bulletins. Its a rolling production change that started the 27th of January. Anything built after has the new bulb, whatever the change may be.

 

EDIT:

 

Looks like they are available, new p/n, which is to an existing bulb. Bulb is used in the current GM vehicles, Volt. ATS. Lacrosse, Regal.

any info on the software flash?

 

i bought a HID kit but honestly just dont want to put it in.

ballasts and bulbs are reliable, these relay harnesses ive seen fail countless times over the years.

Posted

I am in as well, I did the 9011 conversion and it is brighter than stock. If I can get the BCM flash as well to add in some more voltage then it will be even brighter.

Posted

Is the bulb changeover and BCM flashing covered by warranty?

Posted

Is the bulb changeover and BCM flashing covered by warranty?

 

I would start a complaint trail with the dealership now, so when the part numbers become available, you are able to provide the dealership a solution to your issue. Having a history of complaining about the poor quality, should bode well for getting the new bulbs and bcm flash under warranty.

 

Once I get mine done this week, I will chat up my service manager to see what the "buzz words" to have this covered are.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...