Jump to content

help in choosing first shotgun


steveo2155

Recommended Posts

Posted

Any suggestions for first rifle? Have shot numerous times before but never bought one of my own. Will be used for mainly target shooting/clay pigeons and possible deer hunting. I dont want to spend a fortune but want a good gun with somewhat cheap ammo.

Posted

Any suggestions for first rifle? Have shot numerous times before but never bought one of my own. Will be used for mainly target shooting/clay pigeons and possible deer hunting. I dont want to spend a fortune but want a good gun with somewhat cheap ammo.

I like the Remington 870. Relatively inexpensive, and reliable!!!

 

Sent from my 1911-A1

Posted

Your title say's shotgun, yet your post mentions rifle. I'll assume you meant shotgun, so I'll echo the Remington 870 and add in the Mossberg 500. Both are excellent pump shotguns that have been around for a long time and are pretty darn reliable. A 12 ga is the most common shotgun out there, but if you want something a tad lighter that kicks less the 20 ga is also very common. Ammo for both is typically the same price.

Posted

I can wholeheartedly recommend the Franchi Affinity 12g synthetic stock left hand semi-automatic shotgun. If you're shooting sporting clays, you may not want a pump although the prior recommendations aren't wrong.

 

This gun is made by Benelli (a recognized premium brand) and is indistinguishable except that I paid $700 and couldn't have bought Benelli for that. I've put a few hundred shells through this gun in a variety of conditions. Not once has it been unreliable.

 

Pay attention to pump vs semi-auto.

Posted

The best 2 that are popular and affordable are the Remington 870 and Mossberg 500 (or 590 which just has a longer mag tube for more shells). Either is a good choice. But, once I saw that with the Remington if the ejector broke you had to send it to Remington to replace it because of how it's installs. I believe it's a rivet that you can't get to on the other side. With the Mossberg 500 or 590 you can replace the ejector yourself.

Posted

Personal preference, I prefer Ithaca over above mentioned. Ithaca is ambidextrous, mechanically smoother, and you can release the shells out the bottom without chambering. Yes, I own all above and prefer Ithaca

Posted

Good call. One parameter OP didn't list was budget range. That's an important criteria that needs to be included. For skeet/sporting clays, it takes years or seasoning to make a pump work to your advantage.

Posted

Personal preference, I prefer Ithaca over above mentioned. Ithaca is ambidextrous, mechanically smoother, and you can release the shells out the bottom without chambering. Yes, I own all above and prefer Ithaca

That's a good point. I am a lefty and it's always challenging to buy guns.

Posted

My first gun was the Remington 870 Express Tactical. It is a good shotgun, never seemed to have any problems with it. I've only shot slugs out of it however, my local range only allows slugs. I added a limbsaver to it when I shoot it, cuz the 12 GA does have some kick to it lol.

Posted

That's a good point. I am a lefty and it's always challenging to buy guns.

That is a good idea, especially if you are left-handed. Ithaca makes really good shottys!!!

 

Sent from my 1911-A1

Posted

Any suggestions for first rifle? Have shot numerous times before but never bought one of my own. Will be used for mainly target shooting/clay pigeons and possible deer hunting. I dont want to spend a fortune but want a good gun with somewhat cheap ammo.

A shotgun is not a rifle. Nor visa versa. It's like calling a motorcycle a car.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Personal preference, I prefer Ithaca over above mentioned. Ithaca is ambidextrous, mechanically smoother, and you can release the shells out the bottom without chambering. Yes, I own all above and prefer Ithaca

 

The Remington 870 can and should be unloaded without chambering also, it's the correct way to unload the magazine tube. Unfortunately, most people don't take the time to, or care to learn how to properly handle the shotgun and start racking rounds through the chamber......Not a good idea.

Posted

 

The Remington 870 can and should be unloaded without chambering also, it's the correct way to unload the magazine tube. Unfortunately, most people don't take the time to, or care to learn how to properly handle the shotgun and start racking rounds through the chamber......Not a good idea.

 

 

My 500 can be unloaded without chambering too. There's a little spring/tang thing that lets you do so.

 

I like my 500. It's been good to me but the 870 is hardly a bad firearm. Either will serve you well and offer a huge aftermarket to customize it if desired.

Posted

I'll echo the Mossberg 500, I had one that probably ate 10k rounds over the time I owned it and never had an issue. I had three barrels: a 26" improved cylinder that was deadly on ducks, a 30" full choke for turkey and geese, and 28" accuchoke that I used if I knew I was going for mixed bag. That's one I should have never gotten rid of...

 

My father and grandfather have the Mossberg 835, 3-1/2", 12 gauges that work very well. Kick like a mule, but get the job done almost like a 10ga (we had lots of those as well). The main thing with a 3-1/2" 12ga is that you can shoot 2-3/4", 3", and 3-1/2:.

 

The main thing with the Mossbergs is that you can easily switch barrels, swapping from a shotgun barrel to a rifled slug barrel takes literally a few seconds.

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
    • // Thank you, also for your  response. More information is always good. This 2013 GMC is most likely my 'forever truck"-I'm 77 and retired...and truck only has 42K on it-very clean-so I try to keep it that way.  Tks again for your  response- glenn
    • I started my install this weekend. Everything was pretty straight forward but I ran into one issue with running power through the firewall. The nipple grommet on my High Country already has a small harness running through it - has anyone else ran into this issue? And on the engine bay side, does the wire basically just penetrate the factory wiring boot? I did this on my '22 Trail Boss and it seems much easier but thats been a few years. My other thought would be possibly drilling a new hole adding a rubber grommet just to the lower left of the factory hole. Thoughts?   Has anyone used a T-harness off the Bose amp and obtained power from there? It seems a little odd that such a small amp needs 3 power leads
    • ///// Ok--Thanks for that info--I could not find yesterday when I looked for the specs on that NAPA filter what I wanted. Their website is not very user friendly. I buy all teh filters for  our three vehicles once or twice a year. Have always run NAPA Gold on everything I own....I buy it thru my Son's account for his business-which he has a Heavy Equipment repair shop-one reason he uses NAPA so much-they have such a full line of coverage for just about anything/anywhere- He gets s  good discount because of volume bought. Anyway-Thank you -Sir for your response.   glenn
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...