Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Swap it out for the 2018 module. Part # 13521066. You’ll either need to repin the connector since it won’t fit the new module or order my Retrofit Harness for $25.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pgamboa makes life easy lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks again Phil. Works flawlessly and took me longer to find my tools than do the job. Even works with the wife’s IPhone 8 Plus

  • Like 1
Posted
Not nearly as fast as a wired charger.  My rate is around 10-12% per hour.

Ugh.. wired, I’ll go from 75% to full charge on my 35 min commute home from work. It’s still a cool feature to have. I may consider it when I upgrade my my phone to an 8 or X. If CarPlay was wireless it’d be a no brainer, but since you have to plug in for CarPlay anyways, I don’t see the need in my circumstance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
I was just told from my parts guy that the 2018 charging mat P/N is 84199943.  The previous charging mat is 23264395.  The new mat is VERY expensive compared to the previous mat.  The new mat lists for $103.52 and previous mat lists for $9.55.  Gmpartsdirect.com has the new mat $67.08 and the old mat at $6.19.  I ended up ordering one to see why it's so expensive so we will see.
Here's a photo of the new mat... no official gm part numbers. Interesting it says "powermat version gm".5e66e5f0146917186784a13d927414bd.jpg6b289c8a8d4dd5cfadff672b2819df07.jpg
Posted

Just wanted to weigh in.  Purchased the complete Harness From Pgamboa and the upgraded charge module from GM-Parts.   Simple installation,  works perfect.  iPhone 10 charges with Apple leather case on,  no issues,  using factory standard charge mat.   Phone will charge if I lay it down in either direction.    Great advice,  great products!

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, wingsaa said:

Here's a photo of the new mat... no official gm part numbers. Interesting it says "powermat version gm".5e66e5f0146917186784a13d927414bd.jpg6b289c8a8d4dd5cfadff672b2819df07.jpg

My parts guy just sent me pics of the mat today.  This is an expensive piece of rubber.  My guess is since they just changed it for 2018 and the body styles for the pickups and SUVs will all be changing in the next couple of years, they need to cover the cost due to a shorter production run.

20180312_091102-1.jpg

Posted
3 minutes ago, BlkSS said:

My parts guy just sent me pics of the mat today.  This is an expensive piece of rubber.  My guess is since they just changed it for 2018 and the body styles for the pickups and SUVs will all be changing in the next couple of years, they need to cover the cost due to a shorter production run.

20180312_091102-1.jpg

Here's the front. 

20180312_225238.jpg

Posted
Here's the front. 
20180312_225238.thumb.jpg.d5deab469e9ca775442a88b80c5bb8ea.jpg
Okay this is too funny to not post...
Not only is the part ridiculously priced but I looked on gmpartsdirect and they want 50 bucks to ship to Dallas. Pfff...ha!
Posted
1 minute ago, wingsaa said:

Okay this is too funny to not post...
Not only is the part ridiculously priced but I looked on gmpartsdirect and they want 50 bucks to ship to Dallas. Pfff...ha!

I know, it's crazy!  That's why I purchased it from my parts guy at Classic in Grapevine.  He's helped me a ton over the years, especially when I lived in the DFW area and he still gives me wholesale due to working at dealerships.  It's usually cheaper for me to buy from him and have the stuff shipped to Kansas than it is for me to purchase from the local GM dealers or online and have it shipped. 

 

You may try nationalgmparts.com as that's Classic's online parts department. 

Posted
I know, it's crazy!  That's why I purchased it from my parts guy at Classic in Grapevine.  He's helped me a ton over the years, especially when I lived in the DFW area and he still gives me wholesale due to working at dealerships.  It's usually cheaper for me to buy from him and have the stuff shipped to Kansas than it is for me to purchase from the local GM dealers or online and have it shipped. 
 
You may try nationalgmparts.com as that's Classic's online parts department. 
I think I'm just going to wait for now. I just flipped my current mat around and it works fine.
Posted
On 3/12/2018 at 11:35 AM, scott.moody.9401 said:

All this rigamarole and run around about swapping and repinning connectors, I have to lol. All you need to do is trim the rib off the stock connector lol27d5af8cd662b2fc4df6f3bc4b3e404b.jpg2f73545d7cf33069e30c404ecef0b6ad.jpg

Sent from my SM-T817V using Tapatalk
 

This is exactly what I ended up doing. Took less than 5 mins and works flawlessly

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,134 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...