Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I’ve been debating on removing my air dam for a while now and today I finally did it. I’m still really undecided if I like it more off or on. I like it both honestly but can’t decide what looks better. What does everyone think? 

681086A9-09B7-47F5-BF67-6DC313EDBA9C.jpeg

466B6B3F-B62F-4320-9F6C-3BB8F72CB479.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted

Off! I took mine off about a month ago and best decision i ever made, i love that color though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

From the front is the only reason I feel like it doesn’t look right. It could just be because it has been on so long and now it looks taller. I do like it though it’s just different so I guess I’m not used to it. 

C96D5873-CC36-4D05-A491-9687F3579C25.jpeg

Posted

Took it off my 2011 the first week I had it because they look stupid. GM trucks already sit lower than most it seems and these make it worse.

Posted
51 minutes ago, Aaron1085 said:

Mmmm... debating on doing the same. Easy to do?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yea. It only took me 5 minutes but I used a small snap on gun 

Posted
From the front is the only reason I feel like it doesn’t look right. It could just be because it has been on so long and now it looks taller. I do like it though it’s just different so I guess I’m not used to it. 22993f96f34c859cb6d6acf11b00d8b5.jpg  

Hello, I have a 2017 SLT ALL TERRAIN 6.2L in the crimson red. Funny you can not get this colour as GMC is not making this colour anymore, I also have the 6.2 lc77cc82247216da8e36c1b79289f9863.jpg/b24afaaac4577d4060f50b0f6eb55376.jpg[/img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180214/938186bd217e119bf093d9ac6c50f815%5Bimg%5Dhttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180214/690b0217e558def59c427fcc77ffcd5d.jpg[/img].jpg[/img]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

1363d4baa48465f4262a9be5fbab3b5e.jpg72f5c8399d099404511d556082bd549c.jpg8bbf16a30f9e0520a8aac240ccc13d08.jpg
  • Like 2
Posted

Off all day man, geez I love that red on our trucks. All the lower body lines match so nice with the dam removed.

 

Took mine off a good while ago (year or more), no regrets.

96e21dd042516411bfccbfb386561ec5.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Posted

Took mine off also.

Looks better IMO and it's easier to get under for oil changes.

 

:)

Posted
1 hour ago, diyer2 said:

Took mine off also.

Looks better IMO and it's easier to get under for oil changes.

 

:)

It would be easier for me to remove the air dam that go on a diet I guess.  :sigh:

Posted

7d251eb2c2b55468c52af7cf9d6de6e9.jpg

I didn’t like the look with it completely off so I cut it in half. Best of both worlds. Still has the finished look but isn’t dragging on the ground like the stock one looks.

I just took it off and cut it along the seam and reinstalled.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
    • Rockauto bud. I pass local stores for parts.   Findya something online. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...