Jump to content

Having trouble starting after fueling


Recommended Posts

Posted

New to group. Stumped and frustrated in Kentucky thanks for the add My 2006 Colorado doesn't want to start after getting gas whether i fill it up or put 20 in so i started putting gas in while left running but even with that if i put the gas in to fast it wants to stall out. Any one else have this problem and if so can you give me advise as what to do to fix it thank you in advance 

Posted

Sounds like a fuel pump issue.Pain in the you know what you have to drop the gas tank. Good luck patience is the key!!

Posted

Try a new purge valve. If the valve is bad it won’t release pressure in the tank. Or a pressure regulator if there is one on the fuel rail.

 

Posted

Any possibility the fuel you put in was bad? 

Posted

Yup, your purge valve is stuck open and every time you fill the tank you push fumes to the intake and flood it.  

Posted

To start just hold pedal to the floor and release once it starts.

Posted
21 hours ago, Coby7 said:

Yup, your purge valve is stuck open and every time you fill the tank you push fumes to the intake and flood it.  

Ty Coby7

  • 1 month later...
Posted
Yup, your purge valve is stuck open and every time you fill the tank you push fumes to the intake and flood it.  

This is the issue most likely. Easy $10-ish fix.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...