Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

In the car I run about 10mph over on divided highways, in the trucks always 10mph under in the right lane, you don't like it go around! 1 of the trucks has a large keep back sticker on the tailgate and they still tailgate

  • Like 2
  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
2 hours ago, Donstar said:

Personally, I don't use this expression because of the "matrimonial" folklore reference but this is not proven to be where this idiom originated. Unfortunately decent words get removed because of offensive historical references.  Many of our street, building and geographical names are being changed because of suspected connections to people(s) who would not be deserving of this honour today.   This is fine in some very specific situations but many/most of these names are arguably far removed from an individual sharing the name. 

 

WIKI: In English, rule of thumb refers to an approximate method for doing something, based on practical experience rather than theory.[1][2][3] The exact origin of the phrase is uncertain.[4] Its earliest (1685) appearance in print comes from a posthumously published collection of sermons by Scottish preacher James Durham: "Many profest Christians are like to foolish builders, who build by guess, and by rule of thumb (as we use to speak), and not by Square and Rule."[1][5]

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

And if you are doing the speed limit and the line forms? 

 

Do you know where the 'rule of thumb' saying comes from? 

 

From in hurry humans who live like rodents......

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 hours ago, KARNUT said:

On the interstate the right lane has a minimum speed and a speed limit. The passing lane has a not to impede traffic. I asked a traffic policeman once. You come to a line of speeder who do you stop. The last one in line was the answer. 

I have no issues on interstate, it's the in the hurry mostly Texans on US 160 a two lane undivided highway that love to drive 85 in a 65 mph road.   They have no other way to get across southern CO.  I have seen some death defying passing for sure.  There is not always a wide shoulder to get out of the way either. I have to turn off this same road in mountains and I pull over about 3 miles away before turning into our small county road to get off the rodent train. I swear people act like rodents in traffic. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, customboss said:

I have no issues on interstate, it's the in the hurry mostly Texans on US 160 a two lane undivided highway that love to drive 85 in a 65 mph road.   They have no other way to get across southern CO.  I have seen some death defying passing for sure.  There is not always a wide shoulder to get out of the way either. I have to turn off this same road in mountains and I pull over about 3 miles away before turning into our small county road to get off the rodent train. I swear people act like rodents in traffic. 

I spent most my driving life wishing for decent speeds on the interstates. We are there. Some of the secondary roads in Texas are too fast. Especially where you can’t see far enough to slow down when someone enters. Hwy 59 soon to be 69 has cross traffic and no merge lanes. For the longest time it was 55 mph because of cross traffic. Now it has interstate speeds, ridiculous. I have no problem going fast where it’s safe with good visibility. I avoid HYW 59. People who set speed have lost their minds. It should be 65 on interstates in most cases SanAntonio East on 10 and 20 interstates. People are always going to go 5-8 over, it’s human nature. So at 75mph people are going over. It’s just too fast. I can’t believe I’m saying it but I am. People just don’t pay attention.

  • Like 2
Posted

I drive according to how I feel, 5+ over, 5 under. If a car is on my a$$ I pull over when it's safe. Luckily where we live the traffic is light so most times it's not a problem no matter my mood.

  • Like 2
Posted
21 hours ago, garagerog said:

More specifically lemmings.

It just adds to the aspect that poor is a lifestyle. With $3 a gallon gas they could slow down which would equal less wind resistance and hence better mileage, they would save some money. But no, just throw their cash in the fire and complain "I need more MPGs!" 

Another joke:

Helvetica and Times New Roman walk into a bar.

“Get out of here!” shouts the bartender. “We don’t serve your type.”

  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, It's Tim said:

It just adds to the aspect that poor is a lifestyle. With $3 a gallon gas they could slow down which would equal less wind resistance and hence better mileage, they would save some money. But no, just throw their cash in the fire and complain "I need more MPGs!" 

Another joke:

Helvetica and Times New Roman walk into a bar.

“Get out of here!” shouts the bartender. “We don’t serve your type.”

You seem to be hung up on the word poor. You mention it often. Someone driving the speed limit could be called a safe driver and frugal. Often times poor is a state of mind for someone who covenants someone else’s life or property. I know people who live a frugal lifestyle and are very happy. Others who are very extended and are miserable. Self satisfaction is a gift. Lifestyle is often times a choice. Especially in this great country. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Very cool! There was a full size wooden excavator as yard art up in the mountains of NH years ago

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...