Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I did a search and see a discussion on fuel tanks in the motor oil thread, apparently related to diesel tanks.  I'm in the market for a 2019 truck.  I currently have a F150 that has a 36 gallon tank and having a decent sized tank is important to me for the range it provides.  I like the new Sierra AT4 and the 6.2L option, but what is the story with fuel tank sizes on the half ton crew cab/short bed?  Thanks 

Posted
45 minutes ago, FaastEddie said:

Thanks for the link, very helpful.  Bummer for me.  I generally like the truck otherwise.  I can't see a 24 gal tank as being sufficient.

Your Welcome and I agree.  I was hoping for at least 30 gal. tank on the 2019!

Posted

Yeah it's strange that they still don't offer a larger tank. The F-150 comes standard with a little 23 gallon tank and Ford wants $500 for the 36 gallon tank, but at least the option is available.

Posted

I can overlook things like panoramic sunroof or adaptive cruise control but for a vehicle with such a focus on trailer towing function a 24gal tank is beyond questionable. 

Posted

Agree too small a tank for towing I have a 2017 GMC All  Terrain  6.2  you would think Max Tow would have bigger tank I checkin out aftermarket

Posted

In the past when I’ve done searching I have found aftermarket diesel tanks but never gas. If anyone finds another solution please post it up. As I said I otherwise like the truck but with that tiny fuel tank it will probably be a hard pass. 

Posted

Ford did the same. 26 gallon was standard in 2014 and now it is 23. Making the tank smaller is a lazy way to cut weight, nothing more. It isn't like there is a packaging issue to use a bigger one.

Posted

I think the gas tank size is appropriate for the average owner.  Dual tanks were an option in the past.  The extra capacity was needed then because you were getting significantly fewer mpg's!

Posted

FWIW, the 25/3500's have a 36 (136L) gallon tanks. 

 

Another reason for an HD if planning a lot of towing.

Posted
5 hours ago, MikeNH said:

Ford did the same. 26 gallon was standard in 2014 and now it is 23. Making the tank smaller is a lazy way to cut weight, nothing more. It isn't like there is a packaging issue to use a bigger one.

But they have an optional larger tank.  The only excuse to go from 26 to 24 is to offer a larger one.  I'd rather they just put a 28 in all of them.  That's the perfect size in my opinion.  

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Donstar said:

I think the gas tank size is appropriate for the average owner.  Dual tanks were an option in the past.  The extra capacity was needed then because you were getting significantly fewer mpg's!

I do about 400 miles a week at minimum, just commuting to and from work. A few extra trips this week and I'm well past 600. The longer I can go the better. And when I do the trip from NH to MI, being able not to have to fuel up in NY is a big plus. My last Silverado might have been able to do it if you ran it down to nothing, the Wrangler absolutely couldn't and thankfully the Grand Cherokee I drive for now can easily do it. 

13 minutes ago, shift_grind said:

But they have an optional larger tank.  The only excuse to go from 26 to 24 is to offer a larger one.  I'd rather they just put a 28 in all of them.  That's the perfect size in my opinion.  

 

But is it only on certain trims? I think on the current trucks it has to be a long bed to get it. 

Posted

Chevrolet's website says 26 gallons for Crew Cab Short Bed 1500.

 

That's a highway range of about 500 miles before the light comes on.  

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Follows the motif on the Sierra EV.  Satin finsh to the lower bumper area, painted above:   Elevation       Denali      
    • Not exactly what I was hoping for, but I do like it. I wonder if they'll bring back Smokey Quartz Metallic? 🤔 https://gmauthority.com/blog/2026/06/here-is-the-all-new-2027-gmc-sierra-1500/
    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...