Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Got front half of lift installed today.  Will get the back finished tomorrow and go to Firestone for an alignment.
20191207_164412-COLLAGE.thumb.jpg.19a5bc72ab256ae803f4c85c005ec19f.jpg
20191207_165530-COLLAGE.thumb.jpg.dc57d6b08c680f7c1bdfc3d8e08eed96.jpg

Gonna look good what size/brand lift you go with?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
On 11/2/2018 at 1:19 PM, smit303 said:

Or you can disable horn alert when fob is left in vehicle in settings.

As many times I have thought I have done this the dang gone horn still honks.  I guess i still need to read the freakin owners manual.

Posted
On 10/31/2018 at 5:16 AM, 1FUNC5 said:

How did you get your rear box to fit on the mat?

   Steven 

I followed the directions and it worked out well for my 2019 GMC Denali.  I was able to use the "shelf" that came stock with my truck.  Not sure if the divider that came with my truck is entirely considered with the directions.  I can just tell you with the Crew Cab I had to cut away some of the rubber mat that I received from them the dealership.  The directions showed me where I needed to cut away for the back seats.

Posted

Has anyone installed or seen a Peragon Tonneau Cover for the 2019? Thinking about pulling the trigger for my trail boss. They get great reviews but only obtainable through their website making it a direct buy from the company. Looking for some 1st hand experience from someone whose put one in the 2019 so far.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

My Christmas present came in early.

Got it installed with little effort.

 

Advantage Hard Hat Tonneau cover.

I've had the cheaper tri-fold vinyl cover on my previous truck. It worked, but it flopped in the wind at highway speeds and you could see the framework under the vinyl. IE: Not a smooth look on top.

Once I found out this one that has a smooth look, as well as the hard polymer inserts for more security, I was on board.

Cyber Monday came around and I couldn't pass up the discount.

 

The rubber seals, really seal all the way around when the cover is installed and tightened down. No light comes in when it's closed up.

It fits perfectly on the 6' 6" bed with a matching amount of rubber seal all the way around the perimeter.

Here's a quick pic and I'll put more in my Black Trucks album.

 

Patrick

 

 

 

20191208_150221.jpg

Edited by KEEPER OF SECRETS
  • Like 2
Posted
Installed RC lights, love em.

 

32aa9a23f31db2d5b6e91eae4ac114ac.jpg

Are they worth it? They look great and are likely next on my list.

 

Edit: sorry see the other thread now [emoji51]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

So I just got my LTZ Z71, and I’m toying with the idea of putting the 4x4 sticker on the bed. It almost feels like it’s missing something when looking at the back of the truck. But I’m not sure how I feel about having a Z71 badge and a 4x4 sticker. Will I just get used to nothing on bed? I’m so used to seeing stickers on the bed in previous generations. Anybody else had similar thoughts or anyone have any feedback? Thanks!

A1A2C572-AAAC-4C17-A767-939846386978.jpeg

Posted
On 11/28/2019 at 9:19 AM, Texasdeere said:

Installed Iconic 41 Running boards after work yesterday.  I definitely needed a step to get in and out. 

 

 

 

20191127_160228.jpg

20191127_170723small.jpg

I just installed those on my LTZ too. I wanted the ionic 51 but they were out of stock. I’m glad I went with the 41s. They look really good with the LTZ chrome theme.

A6D29D26-28A7-404C-B81A-B35642243A49.jpeg

Posted
5 hours ago, ausomecasey said:

So I just got my LTZ Z71, and I’m toying with the idea of putting the 4x4 sticker on the bed. It almost feels like it’s missing something when looking at the back of the truck. But I’m not sure how I feel about having a Z71 badge and a 4x4 sticker. Will I just get used to nothing on bed? I’m so used to seeing stickers on the bed in previous generations. Anybody else had similar thoughts or anyone have any feedback? Thanks!

A1A2C572-AAAC-4C17-A767-939846386978.jpeg

I personally would not.  I think it looks good clean.  Plus, whatever you get would (in my opinion) look kinda tacky and take away from the look of the LTZ.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...