Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On ‎12‎/‎7‎/‎2018 at 12:35 PM, Burns526 said:

Good Afternoon!

New to the forum here. Took delivery of my new truck last night. (My very first GM product ever). Traded in a 2016 F150 XLT for this 2019 Sierra AT4. (6.2L) Absolutely love this truck, looking forward to actually being able to open my doors when it is below 20 Degrees as it is often here in NH unlike in my previous ride. Not planning many mods (famous last words) at the moment, just a tonneau cover for the time being. 

IMG_4267.jpg

IMG_4264.jpg

Very nice truck. Were you not able to open the doors on your F150 when it got cold?

  • Like 1
Posted

Why does the third pic looks like it is missing the Trail Boss sticker in the back? Photoshop?

 

Posted

I just removed the sticker. Didn't really like it. One of those things were 5 years from now we will look back and say "remember when chevy had a truck that they called the "trailboss". I wanted the package, but not the cheesy sticker!

Posted
1 hour ago, Ben Berkenpas said:

I just removed the sticker. Didn't really like it. One of those things were 5 years from now we will look back and say "remember when chevy had a truck that they called the "trailboss". I wanted the package, but not the cheesy sticker!

How hard was it to remove - did it leave any marking in the clearcoat? Just got mine!

20181220_095716.jpg

Posted

Super easy. No problems at all. Took my wife's hairdryer to it for 30 seconds on high to warm it up,  and it peeled right off. Literally took 2 minutes per side. Very little residue remained. Took one swipe with tar and bug remover to finish it off. Could never tell it was ever there!

Posted
On 10/25/2018 at 5:38 PM, Opiedeegs said:

83179b58d2c02fd064ff34153e14a453.jpg With BackRack and toolbox


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

where did you get the back rack?

Posted
where did you get the back rack?

I took it off my 2013 Silverado

I don’t remember where I purchased it from

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Picked this one up Saturday morning, traded in my 2017 Audi Q7 on it. 

 

8B940984-883A-42A6-8200-0E43BCEDFC61.jpeg

7D243365-AC53-4CB1-AC9A-8D59EABEC938.jpeg

  • Like 11
Posted
8 hours ago, digital_assassin said:

Put some wheels on her Xmas eve. Huge improvement!

92998e7f7ba14d5f1140ef9d2c4d63b3.jpg

e9b7b484a0778cdd41450ef68e82893c.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks sharp

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...