Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 5/1/2019 at 7:42 AM, f8l vnm said:

Nice truck bro! By the way are you in Bakersfield ? I was visiting my cousins last week and saw the same exact truck and with those wheels...

Ha ha, yeah that was me. 

Posted
2 hours ago, BigWoo22 said:

Ha ha, yeah that was me. 

Very nice truck man. ! Wife was like damn you broke your neck looking at that hahaha

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

So my dealer has done about 10 of these with the 2 inch rc level. Anyone else running that successfully? There doing it with 305/55/20 bfg k02’s. I want to fill my well out and get a little more lift up front but not totally eliminate the rake.

7AE9B9D8-45A2-4C42-9C16-D042F70977A8.jpeg

1F4786A0-7CB6-42EA-804C-E593BDC1BCB6.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

I see most of the people leveling their trucks but by raising the front end, has anyone leveled their truck but by lowering the rear? If so, any pics? I dont have an AT4 but I do have an Elevation model(and yes I'm thinking of lowering the back).  Thnxs

Posted
On 10/5/2018 at 8:46 PM, Razorrick said:

Thought  I’d offer my two cents on my mods. First I had a 2” front leveling kit by rough country placed. One gmc dealer refused to put it on. Second dealer no problem. Looks much better. Re aligned. Rides great. Then off for wheels/ tires. Have read 34” and even 35” tires are no problem. I placed nitto ridge grapplers 295/60/20. 33.94 x 11.7. Both fronts rubbed. Trimmed inside plastic flaps. Better, still some rubbing. So people claiming 34/35” clear, not on my truck. Wheels are Gear 20x9” with 18mm offset. Two custom wheel dealers called their reps and were sure they would clear calipers and not stick out past wheel wells much. They would not clear new larger front calipers. Had to add a 1/4” spacer on fronts to clear. Which means these wheels would need about 25mm offset to clear. Love my wheels but a lot of what I found on this forum and wheel/ tire shops I don’t believe to be accurate. I know the 2019 is new and we’re all learning. Just passing on my findings

DE3B4186-9140-4A64-B47D-CF6E2F1B9D93.jpeg

Looks so good! Do you have a link to the wheels/ where did you get GMC centercaps for them? Thanks in advance. Also have you had any issues with the leveling kit? 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 5/16/2019 at 2:25 PM, BigRob_MIA said:

I see most of the people leveling their trucks but by raising the front end, has anyone leveled their truck but by lowering the rear? If so, any pics? I dont have an AT4 but I do have an Elevation model(and yes I'm thinking of lowering the back).  Thnxs

Always lower the rear of my trucks 

2019Silverado4.JPEG

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Just picked up My new At4! And loving every minute of it! 

20x9 Fuel’s

275/65R20 KO2’s

 

123C9E20-C544-46D4-828B-F48CB53024D1.jpeg

75DBE9BE-BAE1-49BB-B44E-AB462C640E4B.jpeg

363AD220-E675-4F74-9602-42DF9C2EA93C.jpeg

Edited by Canmaverick
Posted
10 hours ago, Canmaverick said:

Just picked up My new At4! And loving every minute of it! 

20x9 Fuel’s

275/65R20 KO2’s

 

123C9E20-C544-46D4-828B-F48CB53024D1.jpeg

75DBE9BE-BAE1-49BB-B44E-AB462C640E4B.jpeg

363AD220-E675-4F74-9602-42DF9C2EA93C.jpeg

Very close to what I did. Looks great.

Posted

Congrats Nik;  looks great eh...haha.  Fellow Canuck here.  Haven’t seen too many long box models in the crew cabs.  Love your wheel choice.  Any clearance issues or rubbing?  

Posted

Just browsing Motofab's site, and it appears they are now making a 1.5" lower mount level kit for the AT4 / Trail boss.  Part number CH-15LM-TB. 

Anyone aware of this, or possibly install it yet?  It appears much easier than Rough Country's 1318 which requires a spring compressor.  

Posted (edited)

2019 AT4,   Readylift 2" front level and 3" blocks in rear to keep a small rake...   Vision 18x8.5 0mm offset w same tires Duratracs 275 65 R18

0604191057a.jpg

Edited by NHAT4
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, thsoccer3 said:

Just browsing Motofab's site, and it appears they are now making a 1.5" lower mount level kit for the AT4 / Trail boss.  Part number CH-15LM-TB. 

Anyone aware of this, or possibly install it yet?  It appears much easier than Rough Country's 1318 which requires a spring compressor.  

It appears to be the 1.5" that the owners are already running here in the forum. I have mine sitting in the garage waiting to be installed but ordered before they released or re-labeled this particular AT4/TB lower strut spacer. My purchase order on ebay has a part number listed as "CH-15LM" only. Looking into the pictures they look indentical. Probably their way of telling people 1.5" is their recommendation for AT4/TB trucks.

Edited by asalinasz39

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...