Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Iamslange said:

Looking into a Sierra tomorrow. Was going to take advantage of the 0% and no payment for 120 days. Just curious is there a certain percentage off MSRP I should look for?

take the rebate......I heard the deferred payment applies regardless of 0 %

 

you would have to weigh the rebate and 0% but just the financing isn't good enough....you still have flexibility on how fast you want to pay it off regardless, but youll pay less interest if you get standard loan....to get 0% your credit is already solid so....

Posted
1 minute ago, Dunn said:

take the rebate......I heard the deferred payment applies regardless of 0 %

 

you would have to weigh the rebate and 0% but just the financing isn't good enough....you still have flexibility on how fast you want to pay it off regardless, but youll pay less interest if you get standard loan....to get 0% your credit is already solid so....

Thanks for the response.

So in order to get the 0% I’d most likely have to just settle for whatever rebates they offer and not negotiate any more?

Posted

You generally would get fewer rebates to get 0%.  They basically roll the interest into the cost of the vehicle.  It's a shell game.

Posted (edited)

its usually nothing on rebate only whatever the dealer discount is. but they will make a play for either or I am sure.....with a lot of peeps getting 12k off plus youll never pay that much in interest....not on a low interest loan anyway and if you can get 0% than surely you can get 3-4% from credit union....maybe less

 

seems a lot of buyers can get 12-13k off so no reason why you cant...just have to be willing to walk away

 

 

Edited by Dunn
Posted

Is there any specific dealers most people are going to now for the best deals.  When I bought back in 16, Laura was one of the best.  Not hearing much about them on this forum.  With all the possible deals I'm looking to possibly upgrade.  I'm in Nebraska, but willing to travel anywhere for the right deal.  

Posted

Laura still has good pricing though others are getting similar with dealers around them.....on the HD trucks it seems to be a bigger factor as discounts aren't near as much as their little brothers (1500)….and Laura is consistently 8-12k on HD models, on 1500 just about everyone is giving deals.....just have to throw some feelers out and see what comes back

 

or find guys that have purchased on here and see if you can contact their dealers...especially if they are close to you

Posted
Laura still has good pricing though others are getting similar with dealers around them.....on the HD trucks it seems to be a bigger factor as discounts aren't near as much as their little brothers (1500)….and Laura is consistently 8-12k on HD models, on 1500 just about everyone is giving deals.....just have to throw some feelers out and see what comes back
 
or find guys that have purchased on here and see if you can contact their dealers...especially if they are close to you

Where does this Laura work? Lol I’m new around here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I wish I would’ve waited a little longer. Bought mine 2 weeks ago and only got 9k off with rebates on a Trail Boss. But I’m also in Southern California which I noticed they sell a little higher. Would’ve had a little more bargaining power considering the economy now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, RadoPhan said:

I wish I would’ve waited a little longer. Bought mine 2 weeks ago and only got 9k off with rebates on a Trail Boss. But I’m also in Southern California which I noticed they sell a little higher. Would’ve had a little more bargaining power considering the economy now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

idk.....been looking and there still holding firm so far cept for financing.....they taken least amt of hit offering this instead of discounts or rebates though.....it may change tho

Posted
3 hours ago, TVelar said:

I got 2.59% for 60 months through bank of america.

exactly.....would you take 3% plus all discounts or 0% for 72 or 84 months.....you have freedom either way to pay it off however you want

Posted
idk.....been looking and there still holding firm so far cept for financing.....they taken least amt of hit offering this instead of discounts or rebates though.....it may change tho

True. I’m happy with the truck anyways and got a payment lower than I expected at 3% so it’s not bad at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, RadoPhan said:


True. I’m happy with the truck anyways and got a payment lower than I expected at 3% so it’s not bad at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

stingy mofos out here....always take the rebate even if you qualify for 0% you will still get low digit single and will always be ahead especially at rates that are available now.....they are using rates to suck people in because they know the rebates/discounts overall are customers best friend.....i may be taken a trip out of state

 

i was gonna get that truck last august but damn the price they were getting was damn near full pop...custom TB was a joke so got an RST for about 26% off MSRP....which was fair....lifts and wheels are easy but since i might be trading up to 2500 i am keeping it stock

Edited by Dunn
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

the truck I’m looking at is around 40k msrp.  With using the 0% finance how much negotiating power do I have to get that price down? The incentives they have (without using the 0%) bring it down to about 32k

 

as a back up plan I’m gonna see what kind of rates my credit union is offering. But I was also interested in the no payments for 120 days

 

 

Edited by Iamslange

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
    • It was all part of the tiny bit of fuel savings it goes towards what was mandated by the government. Much like cylinder deactivation. That was relaxed by the recent administration. All that doesn’t help the individual buyer. But as a whole helps the manufacturer to try to reach the previous ridiculous past mileage per gallon mandate. So yes it was mandated and added cost to the vehicle. 
    • You do realize that auto stop/start...was never mandated by the fed...right?     EPA Says It's 'Killing' Stop-Start, and Here's What Automakers Have to Say   "Start‑stop technology has never been federally mandated, and the EPA’s recent action removes regulatory incentives associated with it rather than prohibiting its use."
    • Anytime the government mandates something, you can bet on it being absolutely senseless.
    • just logged my best MPG for one leg this am - drove home from the Denver Airport, 45 min drive - all freeway, lots of traffic so speeds were limited and some stop and go, got 17.7 for the ~30 mile trip.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...