Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, Amcguy1970 said:

 

On my 2014 doing back-to-back tests at the same cruise control mph was about 1.3mpg difference if I remember correctly, definitely north of 1mpg which is what designers and engineers have all stated at highway speeds. 

 

Tyler

I’d be happy adding 1.3 mpg to my city, hwy, and combined numbers.  
 

I think I recall someone talking about running their truck in sport mode, my truck only has normal and off road though. Anyone here have sport mode? Or perhaps that is only for 2wd trucks?

Posted
16 minutes ago, 622Trailboss said:

I’d be happy adding 1.3 mpg to my city, hwy, and combined numbers.  
 

I think I recall someone talking about running their truck in sport mode, my truck only has normal and off road though. Anyone here have sport mode? Or perhaps that is only for 2wd trucks?

 

It would be pretty much limited to the highway numbers. The valence or air dam works better at higher speeds. 

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/30/2023 at 3:24 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I have no idea what set that off or what you THINK you know about what I believe or how that played into the word smithing above. But you might be surprised to know I didn't fall off the turnip truck last night and have made many of the same observations you have and to many of the same conclusions. I know how this works. :rolleyes: 

excellent, don't bring up that electric nonsense anymore lol, we aren't going that way until free energy and best hope a far better battery technology coming as well because the mining for the current tech is not the answer when oil is everywhere and far easier to get at, and then you must know we win this thing and this electric push is temporary, back to the turbo gassers😉

  • Haha 2
Posted

i have sport mode on my 2020 2.7, i havent used it much because all it does is  raise the shift rpm's and change how the truck steers. i didnt notice any change in steering

Posted
3 minutes ago, silveradosid said:

i have sport mode on my 2020 2.7, i havent used it much because all it does is  raise the shift rpm's and change how the truck steers. i didnt notice any change in steering

 

 

Stiffens the steering.  I can feel the change.  Also sharpens up the shift feel a bit as well and will hold gears a bit longer instead of trying to get to 7th or 8th as fast as possible like in normal mode.  

  • Like 1
Posted

Update on oil usage and dipstickology....

 

Checked the oil at same place in garage about same temp as normal 20-30F.  Miraculously my oil was full. After 100 miles ago seeing about 1/8 drop on stick.  Like the 6.6L woes some are seeing our beloved L3B may be hiding oil in coolers and heat exchangers?  @newdude can you research this with access the rest of us won't have?

 

Before I shut it down for a day I was in the turbo doing donuts outside in 2-3 " of snow and ice.  Possible that when I do my paw paw driving it hides oil in a cooler that is closed off because its not hot enough to open thermally controlled valve?

 

Checked the dipstick 5 X and 4X it was full.  1 time it was lower than 1/8 so it may have not filled the dipstick slide? 

 

I'm failing dipstickology!!! 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Just wanted to follow up on the JB4 Burger tuner. It was pretty decent just felt a little too unpolished. It made the truck move but the shifting couldn’t keep up and it just felt detached from the rest of the powertrain. 
 

Burger tuning has great customer service and offers a “30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee”. I should have read the fine print, you’re hit with a 20% restocking fee. I don’t recommend the tuner. I’m trying a Pulsar LT next for throttle adjustment, Start/Stop disable and I’ll get bigger tires soon so speedo calibration. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I haven’t owned my truck a full month yet, I’m curious how low can you go on the miles to empty gauge?  Is it fairly accurate? How low can you go or have you gone? 
 

For example, in my other car once I get to about 45 miles I better be finding a gas station soon as that about the point in which the job fuel light illuminates.

Posted
20 hours ago, 622Trailboss said:

I haven’t owned my truck a full month yet, I’m curious how low can you go on the miles to empty gauge?  Is it fairly accurate? How low can you go or have you gone? 
 

For example, in my other car once I get to about 45 miles I better be finding a gas station soon as that about the point in which the job fuel light illuminates.

 

Best not to test it and run out of fuel. I typically fuel up my truck when it hits a quarter of a tank, regardless of what the DTE says.

  • Like 2
Posted
22 hours ago, 622Trailboss said:

I haven’t owned my truck a full month yet, I’m curious how low can you go on the miles to empty gauge?  Is it fairly accurate? How low can you go or have you gone? 
 

For example, in my other car once I get to about 45 miles I better be finding a gas station soon as that about the point in which the job fuel light illuminates.

Once the low fuel light comes on and miles to empty = 0 I have about 3 gallons remaining but not sure if all that is useable. 

Posted (edited)

I installed the Pulsar LT today. I haven’t seen anyone else with it on the 2.7L. This thing is sweet. So easy to install and “program”. Disabling Auto-Shutoff works like a charm and just increasing the throttle 15% is great!  There’s no more “lag” when hitting the pedal. Drivability is much improved. I recommend it. 

 

When I get (slightly) larger tires my speedo won’t be off either. 

Edited by Mike Borowski
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Mike Borowski said:

I installed the Pulsar LT today. I haven’t seen anyone else with it on the 2.7L. This thing is sweet. So easy to install and “program”. Disabling Auto/Shutoff works like a charm and just increasing the throttle 15% is great!  There’s no more “lag” when hitting the gas. Drivability is much improved. I recommend it. 

 

When I get (slightly) larger tires my speedo won’t be off either. 

Thanks for sharing, keep us posted 

Posted (edited)
On 2/1/2023 at 5:26 PM, Mike Borowski said:

Anyone running 33’s with the 2.7?  Big performance decrease and or MPG decrease?

 

I am, see my signature below, that's what it came with (factory 20's) then I sold the 20's and went a direction most guys don't go...I went to same height but skinnier lighter tires and wheels, pizza cutters. I lost 4 lbs per corner making this move to 33x10's. I went to load range e tires as I never get flats, I gained 1.5" sidewall, and I have snow flake rated all terrains...and did all that while losing 4 lbs per corner! I noticed zero loss in performance and man do I ever have excellent traction in the slippery stuff as compared to my gladiator on 37x12.50's, night and day difference, the jeep is a drifting skating rink of a machine lol. 

 

To add to this, I have a 4" lift, removed the chin spoiler, added the heavy high clearance side steps, chains, tools, recovery gear and 400 lb fuel tank, total added weight is 985 lbs...and I can still achieve rated hwy mpg if I behave at about 65 mph on cruise. Love the pizza cutters! 

Edited by 4banger

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...