Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, customboss said:

BTW this has become a good discussion. Whether you agree with current situation or not. 
Peckish synapse discussion is helpful. We all want what’s best for our families and country. 

I can’t wait to see how all the tariff stuff plays out. Do I think prices could rise short term, possibly. Can you imagine if our industrial complex gets stronger. We can have more influence over our advisory’s by increasing oil production? Stop Iran from getting money through oil unless they behave.  All these policy’s aren’t new. Kennedy, Regan and Clinton did different versions of the same thing and we prospered. It’s not Rocket Science. It’s a path well worn.

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I can’t wait to see how all the tariff stuff plays out. Do I think prices could rise short term, possibly. Can you imagine if our industrial complex gets stronger. We can have more influence over our advisory’s by increasing oil production? Stop Iran from getting money through oil unless they behave.  All these policy’s aren’t new. Kennedy, Regan and Clinton did different versions of the same thing and we prospered. It’s not Rocket Science. It’s a path well worn.

We are gonna see. Putting tariffs on our two

largest trading partners is a brutal

play and tariffs are taxes on consumers so how long that tax lasts while we leverage them is TBD. 

  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, customboss said:

We are gonna see. Putting tariffs on our two

largest trading partners is a brutal

play and tariffs are taxes on consumers so how long that tax lasts while we leverage them is TBD. 

Maybe there will be an offset. I agree we’ll see.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, KARNUT said:

You obviously have never been in a situation where you had to depend on other people for information. I guess you expect the most powerful person to go over the government spending report himself. His point obviously is on cutting expenses. That was an example. There are many others. You want to call the most powerful person a liar because someone gave him bad info. You’re being ridiculous. And showing your stripes. I guess you never gave wrong information based on another’s research. I believe in a perfect person. It’s not you. You called a man a liar. He’s definitely not going to do that willingly. It to easy to fact check. I guess you can’t even consider it may have been a setup. You claim not to political, your statement was. You claim to be fair and not judgmental, you obviously were. Then you quote scripture. Hypocritical. 

 

Yea, that's  the reason. :rolleyes: 

 

So, researchers are at fault? For nine years? Lets run that down the rational rabbit hole with the actions in example of a guy named Joe Schmoe. 

 

1.)  Joe hires researchers and they feed him lies, he fires them. Still he hired them and once in awhile someone can fool the best of us. Granted. But if Joe goes many years, a decade say, and can't hire a good ones, then, he's incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

2.) If Joe doesn't fire them and keeps them knowing they are unreliable, he's Incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

3.) If they are competent and feed Joe the truth and he ignores it, then he's just choosing to lie and am by definition a liar. 

 

So Stan, which one is it? You choose. Is a Joe incompetent or a liar. 

 

Why you making this personal? The topic is TRUTH not Trump. It is the topic of the ENTIRE THREAD. :idiot:

 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Yea, that's  the reason. :rolleyes: 

 

So, researchers are at fault? For nine years? Lets run that down the rational rabbit hole with the actions in example of a guy named Joe Schmoe. 

 

1.)  Joe hires researchers and they feed him lies, he fires them. Still he hired them and once in awhile someone can fool the best of us. Granted. But if Joe goes many years, a decade say, and can't hire a good ones, then, he's incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

2.) If Joe doesn't fire them and keeps them knowing they are unreliable, he's Incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

3.) If they are competent and feed Joe the truth and he ignores it, then he's just choosing to lie and am by definition a liar. 

 

So Stan, which one is it? You choose. Is a Joe incompetent or a liar. 

 

Why you making this personal? The topic is TRUTH not Trump. It is the topic of the ENTIRE THREAD. :idiot:

 

Really we’re not that stupid. Or maybe you think we or I am. Of course it was about Trump. At least you know where I stand. I think he’s the right person at the right time. You don’t that’s fine every one is entitled to their opinion. If you claim you don’t have one. Brother I don’t believe it for a minute. The man’s been office a few days and he’s had time to vet everyone? Get real. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Yea, that's  the reason. :rolleyes: 

 

So, researchers are at fault? For nine years? Lets run that down the rational rabbit hole with the actions in example of a guy named Joe Schmoe. 

 

1.)  Joe hires researchers and they feed him lies, he fires them. Still he hired them and once in awhile someone can fool the best of us. Granted. But if Joe goes many years, a decade say, and can't hire a good ones, then, he's incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

2.) If Joe doesn't fire them and keeps them knowing they are unreliable, he's Incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

3.) If they are competent and feed Joe the truth and he ignores it, then he's just choosing to lie and am by definition a liar. 

 

So Stan, which one is it? You choose. Is a Joe incompetent or a liar. 

 

Why you making this personal? The topic is TRUTH not Trump. It is the topic of the ENTIRE THREAD. :idiot:

 

Psssst, #3 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

Really we’re not that stupid. Or maybe you think we or I am. Of course it was about Trump. At least you know where I stand. I think he’s the right person at the right time. You don’t that’s fine every one is entitled to their opinion. If you claim you don’t have one. Brother I don’t believe it for a minute. The man’s been office a few days and he’s had time to vet everyone? Get real. 

 

Let's circle back a few pages to this....

 

On 1/31/2025 at 3:07 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

He's sure DEI is responsible for the air crash. But when pushed by the press pool on the source of his remarks it boiled down to "Well....it could be true". 😬 IT COULD BE TRUE?? :dunno:  Really??

 

So he lies. He tells you he's lying and you still think that even when he admits to a lie he's telling the truth? 

 

 :idiot:

 

Go back to the first quote and tell me how I can not possibly draw that conclusion. You have zero defense and yet you insist. 

 

Stan, do you remember my stance on IRRATIONAL ARGUMENTS? Well, you leave me no choice and yet you had one. 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted
22 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Let's circle back a few pages to this....

 

 

So he lies. He tells you he's lying and you still think that even when he admits to a lie he's telling the truth? 

 

 :idiot:

 

Go back to the first quote and tell me how I can not possibly draw that conclusion. You have zero defense and yet you insist. 

 

Stan, do you remember my stance on IRRATIONAL ARGUMENTS? Well, you leave me no choice and yet you had one. 

 

 

You’re only convincing me absolutely you were targeting Trump. Sure doesn’t mean absolutely yes. It leaves wiggle room. As he stated as you pointed later. When he said it could be. And as we’re learning it could be true. It a combination of factors or could be a combination of factors. Only a lie in your mind because you want it to be. And that doesn’t make it so. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

You’re only convincing me absolutely you were targeting Trump. Sure doesn’t mean absolutely yes. It leaves wiggle room. As he stated as you pointed later. When he said it could be. And as we’re learning it could be true. It a combination of factors or could be a combination of factors. Only a lie in your mind because you want it to be. And that doesn’t make it so. 

 

 I said I'm not having an irrational argument with you?  You are too intelligent to be this thick. THINK Stanley THINK. 

 

Now, if you must. Have the last word. Be my guest. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted
9 hours ago, KARNUT said:

They’re not many people who could have handled what has come his way in the last 10 years. Just in the last few days Jeffies has called for fighting Trump policy’s in the streets. He gets a pass. Trump says peacefully protest. They say he caused a riot. It’s just so slanted.

I have to clear this up. Trump did say to peacefully protest, but he said it in the beginning of the speech. He then went

on for over an hour about how the election was stolen giving specific details that were very believable. His closing words were to fight like hell and to march over to the capitol.

 

Nobody influenced me to think like this. In fact I was mostly a trump supporter until I did my own due diligence on j6. I thought it was all make believe until I decided to imagine myself being there listening to that speech. I honestly might have stormed the capital too.


He’s such a piece of ****** for that speech.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

We’ve have expressed our thoughts on this and there’s nothing more to gain at this point. I’m going to be happy for the accomplishment that will get us back on course after the destruction and chaos of the last four years. And watching with joy as people begin held against their will are returned to their homes. Especially the children who were sold into unspeakable situations, some already found. Only in this situation because of the policy of the past. Some will happily try to find flaws in the man, we all have them. I will see hope in the future as a country gets set right. Some will joyfully look for bumps in the road, there always are. I will observe the steady movement in the right direction. We’ve seen this movie before we know how it ends. This man did it once. He will do it again. 

Posted

This be me pumping the brakes guys.

 

Admin just tapped me on the shoulder so we can get back on topic OR the tread will get locked down. I prefer it isn't. So let's put the stick in some other none political pot. No pointing, no blaming, just poly-silence. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

Y'all had your free time. Stayed civil but lets dial it back a notch. I'd like to discuss this stuff as much as y'all.

i hear this stuff everywhere else, don't need to hear it here too. :)

  • Like 1
Posted

The sermon this Sunday was lifting up people around you. I try to do that. I have a blessed life. I met my wife early in high school an army brat. Used to living a frugal life. Some simple tips to live an upper middle class life on a lower middle class income. Buy a modest first home. Pay it on a fifteen year program. So while my kids were in school we paid off our first mortgage. We shopped at resale shops. My wife drove certified pre owned cars. My wife started working after the last kid started school. All her money was for investments and an IRA. Her first new car was a in 1994 an Impala SS. When we sold it years later it was worth more than we paid for it. She only drove it as a daily for a year recognizing it was an investment. That was just lucky. The second home, the current one we put enough down to equal the previous mortgage paying it off in ten years. By this time the average middle class income was double. The rest of the first home money built our rental on the back of the property. My car addiction was handled with an allowance and my ability to refurbish and turn over classic cars and trucks. Not dinging the budget. I don’t do Starbucks. On trips we do value meals. When I want water on a trip. I go into whatever truck stop I got gas with my tumbler. Put ice fountain water. I have yet to be charged for that. We have never bought new furniture. But we have the best you can buy, many antiques. Most from moving sales or garage sales. Appliances are new. Pretty frugal right? Now our vacation, hobby. Ready, we go to casinos and play cards. About 8-10 times a year multiple nights. Anywhere from 0-8K a year total all paid for from rent from the rental house. How so cheap. We like paigow poker. Sometimes all afternoon  usually 200$ each that’s if we had a bad day. In return our meals, lodging and drinks are comp. Sometimes I wonder to slots. Usually they comp free play. They usually have drawings, slot torn tournaments etc. This hobby, vacation only works if you have willpower. They are designed to suck money out of you. We hunkered down hard the first part of our life. Then it was a breeze. All while building a family business. Talk about a grind. But that’s another more interesting story.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • If everything checks out at the MAF, then the MAF is BAD, new or not.   You don't need a signal generator to troubleshoot this. PCM needs ALL powers and ALL grounds able to light a halogen headlight bulb - if it can light the bulb bright, then the wiring is good enough to run the PCM.   Best thing you can do for yourself is spend some time here: scannerdanner.com - Check out all his YouTube videos on similar issues. If you decide to subscribe it's the best bang-for-buck ratio in the automotive world, hands-down. He's got TONS of free vids on YouTube, too.
    • Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
    • Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...