Jump to content

Post your T1 wheel/tire setup

BevoXV
 Share

Recommended Posts

Lmkelly New Member

Lmkelly

Posted
Posted
On 10/9/2020 at 10:58 AM, ryany035 said:

Took off my stock 20” SLT wheels and installed the AT4 wheels. Got them for $900. Steal! Next to come is a 3-4” lift with new tires. Will upload more pics soon as lift is on. 

11DEBE33-64B8-4EFA-BB8B-1EDF88C123B4.jpeg

 What setup are you going with?  Lift?  Tire size?

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

BevoXV
BevoXV

I know the K2 guys have one of these threads so I figured we should too. Think it’d be useful for others. Post pics of your setup! Make sure to add specs of the wheels/tires, spacers, suspension, rubb

bamulk
bamulk

Method NV 305 18x9 -12 Offset Cooper Discoverer S/T Maxx 295/70/18 1.5 Level (Trailboss) Slight Rub on mudflap on full lock.   

BevoXV
BevoXV

Caliper clearance!

Posted Images

204Denali Enthusiast

204Denali

Posted
Posted
On 11/13/2020 at 7:47 PM, MemzDenali said:

285/55/22 nitro ridge grapplers. This is the exact look I was looking for. Traded in my 2019 4runner for this 2021 GMC Sierra Denali and really dig the 6.2! 

20201113_154329.jpg

20201113_154316.jpg

Is that stock suspension still?  It looks like its been leveled ? 

AdamAT4 Enthusiast

AdamAT4

Posted
Posted
On 10/28/2020 at 3:27 AM, Solitaire223 said:

image0.thumb.jpg.6ade54f7f9465048799c3fec366f240b.jpgStock truck, 17 inch wheels

Which wheels are these? i'd like to see a few more pictures. i was stuck between 17 or 18s for my AT4. I want the offroad look but tire availability may dictate which size i go with.  

Solitaire223 New Member

Solitaire223

Posted
Posted

Method 312 bronze 17’s. Better check with manufactures before you order 18’s.  They would work on my truck due to the convex.  The raised rail on the outside of the brake calipers disqualifies a lot of wheels.  Not sure if the AT4 has the same or not

Tcturbo91 New Member

Tcturbo91

Posted
Posted

I read through all 38 pages in here, great Info.

 

 I just got a killer deal on some 20x9 -20 wheels, I currently have stock 18” wheels. RST, stock suspension. 
 

My question: with the offset I should stay with a stock size 275/60/20 correct? Seems like anything bigger with the offset I’ll rub

Justin Vaughn Enthusiast

Justin Vaughn

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 8/31/2020 at 11:12 AM, osumason said:

I will be going with either the Venomrex 601 

Wheel Specs
Size: 20X9.0
Offset: 0 (Chevy/GMC/Dodge)
Backspacing: 5.0" (Chevy/GMC/Dodge)
  

 

Or the Black Rhino Shrapnel

20x9.5

Offset 12

 

 

Hey @osumason I have the VR-601s mounted up with 285/60/20.  Stock AT4.

Required trimming mudflaps but still locks at full turn under compression, haven't made the time to trim up more yet.

Ref code for $50 off (mods, PM if not allowed)

 

PXL_20201104_141725064.jpg

Edited by Justin Vaughn
  • Like 1
Justin Vaughn Enthusiast

Justin Vaughn

Posted
Posted
On 7/19/2020 at 3:20 PM, N2HighVoltage said:

2020 GMC SIERRA 1500 4X4 CREW CAB 3.0 Duramax

Front: FOX 2.5 Coilovers front (3.5” of lift)

Rear: Deaver mini pack w/FOX 2.0 (1.5’-2” lift)

Wheels: American Racing AX202 18x9 0mm/5.0” backSpacing

Tires: BFG K02 35x12.50x18
Trimming required...good instructions adjust based on your needs...no rubbing now.  
186318

 


 

 

2A5C52CC-2436-4D1F-970E-6FCA9A6D3454.jpeg

DEED15E0-077D-4545-BCBD-C21ADCD2D0EA.jpeg

A7C4043D-1A12-489D-A996-362AAD912D83.jpeg

81CBA790-B00C-4BAA-89D4-747C875CE911.jpeg

Looks great!  Did you get the Deaver AAL that is on their site or did you use the one from Cognito?

ALso, did you do UCAs up front?

Thanks in advance.

osumason Enthusiast

osumason

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Justin Vaughn said:

Hey @osumason I have the VR-601s mounted up with 285/60/20.  Stock AT4.

Required trimming mudflaps but still locks at full turn under compression, haven't made the time to trim up more yet.

Ref code for $50 off (mods, PM if not allowed)

 

PXL_20201104_141725064.jpg

Yeah I tried that size, but didn't really want to trim anything so I replaced them with 275/55's.  I'm thinking 275/60's would have worked also. 

CMillSilverado Enthusiast

CMillSilverado

Posted
Posted
On 11/22/2020 at 10:16 AM, Tcturbo91 said:

I read through all 38 pages in here, great Info.

 

 I just got a killer deal on some 20x9 -20 wheels, I currently have stock 18” wheels. RST, stock suspension. 
 

My question: with the offset I should stay with a stock size 275/60/20 correct? Seems like anything bigger with the offset I’ll rub

I'm slightly rubbing with 20x9 zero offset, 275/65/20's, & 1in lift front but in reverse only.

  • Thanks 1
Pyroman_28 Enthusiast

Pyroman_28

Posted
Posted

I had to replace some damaged wheels and went with these:  Vision Spyder 22x12 -57mm offset.  Only rubs a little bit at full lock in reverse.

New Wheels.jpg

  • Like 3
Airball50 Enthusiast

Airball50

Posted
Posted
On 7/9/2020 at 4:23 PM, Smrtasp said:

Finally got mine done. 2019 Denali 4x4 with 2.5 front level and 1.5 rear level using SuspensionMaxx kit. Wheels are 20x9 +1 Fuel Rage D711 with 295/60/20 Nitto Ridge Grapplers. Had to do some minor trimming on the backside of the wheel well carpeting and a little to the inside edge of the mud flaps. 

 

 

Denali1.jpg

Denali2.jpg

Denali3.jpg

Denali4.jpg

Your truck looks great!!   I'm jealous!   Any issues w/ your lift and the ARC on the Denali?  I've heard some horror stories.  That stance would work well for me; I cant go much higher given parking garage issues.  

KADE206 Enthusiast

KADE206

Posted
Posted
On 11/13/2020 at 5:47 PM, MemzDenali said:

285/55/22 nitro ridge grapplers. This is the exact look I was looking for. Traded in my 2019 4runner for this 2021 GMC Sierra Denali and really dig the 6.2! 

20201113_154329.jpg

20201113_154316.jpg

Are you Stock height or lifted? I'm surprised to see no issues on a 285/55/22 with the stock +27 offset. Any trimming or rubbing?

204Denali Enthusiast

204Denali

Posted
Posted
On 12/1/2020 at 8:01 PM, KADE206 said:

Are you Stock height or lifted? I'm surprised to see no issues on a 285/55/22 with the stock +27 offset. Any trimming or rubbing?

I do not believe that is stock height

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • PunchT37
      Parking Brake - Automatic Engagement Questions

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • SoCal Angler
      Parking Brake - Automatic Engagement Questions

      By SoCal Angler · Posted

      2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...