Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/30/2019 at 2:42 PM, flyingfool said:

the future is electric motors 100% , but it's not gonna be powered by batteries! 

I was hoping a substitute for gas (biofuels?) would be developed and simply be a plug' n play solution!  The future is in electric vehicles and I am hoping to make the switch before I have to or we all hit crisis mode.  The video you attached is excellent and I watched all of the speakers or the first 45 minutes.  I will finish later. Nobody can dispute the ability of electric motors to provide ample power for our personal vehicles.  If you've been on a modern cruise ship chances are it was propelled by electric motors.  The best criticism people come up with against electric motors is range and recharge.  EV's are already on the streets around the world including black cabs in London.  As supported in the video, the future will only see improvements in the supply of power.  I was looking at Chevy Bolt on the weekend for my wife.  I believe the battery pack is guaranteed 8yrs/100k miles.  I can safely expect that come replacement time, a significantly improved power source will be ready for install.  It would be worthwhile for your video to be added to the thread below.

 

Posted

If you do the math on this, that tow strap had less than 2000 pounds of force on it. 

 

Steel wheel on a a steel rail is about as low of a friction coefficient as possible. 

 

The truck basically needed less than 30hp to pull it straight. 

Posted
12 hours ago, econometrics said:

If you do the math on this, that tow strap had less than 2000 pounds of force on it. 

 

Steel wheel on a a steel rail is about as low of a friction coefficient as possible. 

 

The truck basically needed less than 30hp to pull it straight. 

Yeah, when we were young and into off-roading, we snapped straps twice that size trying to pluck 1 truck out of a mudhole. You can break a tow strap rated for 50,000# pretty easy if you hit it hard enough. We often would use two chains coupled to an old tire in the middle to hit when we kept breaking straps. A Prius could have pulled that train easy. I have to move several cars down the tracks with my wheel loader at a customer's facility and its easier to push 4 rail cars loaded to 250,000lbs each down the track than it is to remove a 20,000lb truck and trailer from a ditch. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, L86 All Terrain said:

A Prius could have pulled that train easy. 

That's what GM should hit back with... how embarrassing would that be for Ford? 

 

A Chevy Volt pulling the same train, Lol. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 7/25/2019 at 6:42 AM, diyer2 said:

Battery power is for screw guns, flashlights, etc. and vibrators.

 

:)

how about a Gasoline fired refrigerator?    

Posted
On 8/6/2019 at 10:18 AM, econometrics said:

That's what GM should hit back with... how embarrassing would that be for Ford? 

 

A Chevy Volt pulling the same train, Lol. 

No  Chevy Tahoe  hybrid  the volts bigger brother... :) :):) 

Posted
On 7/30/2019 at 4:42 PM, flyingfool said:

the future is electric motors 100% , but it's not gonna be powered by batteries! 

Try wireless power transmitted thru the air, much like radio signals. US NAVY have a test rig set up in Texas as we speak and they are using it to power cars and aircraft within a few mile radius..

Somewhere, Nikola Tesla is saying "I told you so--126 years ago!"

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, MaverickZ71 said:

Somewhere, Nikola Tesla is saying "I told you so--126 years ago!"

damn right , but the investment BAnkers did not like it because they had no way to bill the customer for power consumption, since its transmitted to everyone no wires, means no meter=no profit

  • Like 1
  • 11 months later...
Posted

it has it's place,  i find they are more powerful than combustion motors.  queter, can take more abuse and less maintnance.. its the future. only down side we will be tethered to a power supply somehow with less freedom than liquid fuels vehicles

Posted

Nothing exceptional.  Locomotives use electric motors to pull.  The diesel engines on them are use to turn the generators to produce the electricity.  

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 8/8/2020 at 9:02 PM, Black02Silverado said:

Nothing exceptional.  Locomotives use electric motors to pull.  The diesel engines on them are use to turn the generators to produce the electricity.  

Very true, there is no mechanical connection at all.  It only take 5hp to move one a full loaded rail car so it would not take much to pull those cars.  I think it was Dodge that did that stunt originally I think with the Dakota. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...