Jump to content

Ford's Electric F-150 Prototype "Tows" 1 Million Pounds

Gorehamj
 Share

Recommended Posts

Gorehamj Senior Enthusiast

Gorehamj

Posted
Posted

 

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
7-24-2019

Ford has been working hard behind the scenes to develop the world's first mass-produced, mainstream electric pickup truck. That development is now to the point where Ford is ready to start showing off a bit. This week, Ford's chief engineer for the F-150, Linda Zhang, hooked up the test mule to ten double-decker rail cars. She then tugged that train 1,000 feet. To add a bit of drama, she then loaded up 42 F-150s into those rail cars and did it again. Clearly, electric trucks will be tow monsters. 

Ford is one of the best-positioned automakers to advance its fleet with electric drive. Ford is now a partner with not only Rivian, who is developing a luxury EV pickup, but also with VW. No other automaker has as much to lose by falling behind in the EV transition, and no other automaker seems better positioned to profit from EVs when they are finally ready for the masses. 

 

Related Story: Is GM Working On EV Pickups?

All-Electric-F-150-03.jpg

  • Like 1
EpicLT Enthusiast

EpicLT

Posted
Posted

One of my favorite comments for this on Facebook was “there is next to no resistance on those rails. I bet a focus could tow that once it got started.” Also lots of people wondering where they got a strap that small rated for 1.25 million pounds. On a personal note, I am excited to see what they can do with an electric truck. If people actually use their trucks to haul stuff, how long will the battery last? 

  • Like 2
Jglew82 Enthusiast

Jglew82

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, EpicLT said:

 On a personal note, I am excited to see what they can do with an electric truck. If people actually use their trucks to haul stuff, how long will the battery last? 

This is what I'm super interested in too. If they can get battery development to the point of seeing 400-500 miles range, I'd buy one in a heartbeat. Loaded down and pulling a trailer all the time may be better suited for ICE applications, though. Charging station infrastructure just isn't quite there yet. That said, hot-shotters and such that haul long distance will likely go for the HD/Diesel options anyway, but the occasional short load haul for an electric truck could be practical. Pulling a camper/boat across the state, however...

 

It'll be interesting to see!

Edited by Jglew82
  • Like 1
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Battery power is for screw guns, flashlights, etc. and vibrators.

 

:)

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Jglew82 Enthusiast

Jglew82

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

Battery power is for screw guns, flashlights, etc. and vibrators.

 

:)

I don't know, man, I know plenty of gas-powered vibrators out there... They just happen to be late model GM products with the "Chevy Shake" or running on a dead cylinder or 3 :lol:

  • Like 3
  • Haha 3
  • Sad 1
L86 All Terrain Senior Enthusiast

L86 All Terrain

Posted
Posted

Hmmm reminds me of this old Chevy ad pulling 187 tons of logs. Looks like the old 170hp pickups were tow monsters too. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
j-ten-ner Senior Enthusiast

j-ten-ner

Posted
Posted
On 7/25/2019 at 8:35 AM, mikedeezxxx said:

I just don’t see hardcore Ford F 150 guys buying into an electric truck.

We all will. Eventually.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted (edited)

1 million lbs? The damn thing is on wheels, take the wheels off and pull it then now your pulling 1 million lbs. What BS but people will believe it. I would like to see them put a inline weight scale on the tow strap and that would tell you the real pulling weight.

Edited by Silverado4x4
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
greatmizzou Enthusiast

greatmizzou

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Silverado4x4 said:

1 million lbs? The damn thing is on wheels, take the wheels off and pull it then now your pulling 1 million lbs. What BS but people will believe it. I would like to see them put a inline weight scale on the tow strap and that would tell you the real pulling weight.

Arent all tow specs based on heavy things on wheels tho?  :)

  • Like 3
Thomcat Senior Enthusiast

Thomcat

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Silverado4x4 said:

1 million lbs? The damn thing is on wheels, take the wheels off and pull it then now your pulling 1 million lbs. What BS but people will believe it. I would like to see them put a inline weight scale on the tow strap and that would tell you the real pulling weight.

Agree

 

Horsepower is horsepower, as I remember it GM pulled this same stunt in the 60s using an Olds Vistacruiser with rocket V8 and nothing unique to an electric motor,  just simple physics.

 

Gimmick is to use an automatic with a HD torque converter and a good tranny cooler, attempt this stunt with a manual tranny and you'd fry the clutch long before anything begins to move. Ditto using an electric motor as the engine with a standard tranny. All you have to do is apply a constant very, very gradually increasing amount of power without overheating the torque convertor. Then after coupler slack is taken up, the conscript with a max. weight equivalent to the summation of the individual weight of each unit of rolling stock times the coefficient of the rolling friction for the trucks on the unit and eventually the conscript will begin to move. Max speed is limited to keeping the tranny fluid temps below the point where the torque convertor will blow or the tranny pump can no longer apply enough pressure to hold the bands against the gear sets, and the coefficient of friction of the truck tires against the surface.

 

 Might even be practical to substitute an electric truck in place of a 10,000 hp diesel electric locomotive, though might take the goods a long time to get to market when limited to a max. speed of 5 mph or with a rate of acceleration of 0-5 mph in 4 hours to never......and if absent  an air brake hookup, good luck trying to stop it without the truck being pushed into the next State.

MaverickZ71 Senior Enthusiast

MaverickZ71

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 7/24/2019 at 10:12 AM, Gorehamj said:

 

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
7-24-2019

Ford has been working hard behind the scenes to develop the world's first mass-produced, mainstream electric pickup truck. That development is now to the point where Ford is ready to start showing off a bit. This week, Ford's chief engineer for the F-150, Linda Zhang, hooked up the test mule to ten double-decker rail cars. She then tugged that train 1,000 feet. To add a bit of drama, she then loaded up 42 F-150s into those rail cars and did it again. Clearly, electric trucks will be tow monsters. 

Ford is one of the best-positioned automakers to advance its fleet with electric drive. Ford is now a partner with not only Rivian, who is developing a luxury EV pickup, but also with VW. No other automaker has as much to lose by falling behind in the EV transition, and no other automaker seems better positioned to profit from EVs when they are finally ready for the masses. 

 

Related Story: Is GM Working On EV Pickups?

All-Electric-F-150-03.jpg

Were those the same Ford-modified train cars that later derailed, spilling Silverados, Sierras, and Gladiators all over the desert?  

Edited by MaverickZ71
flyingfool Senior Enthusiast

flyingfool

Posted
Posted

the future is electric motors 100% , but it's not gonna be powered by batteries! 

Try wireless power transmitted thru the air, much like radio signals. US NAVY have a test rig set up in Texas as we speak and they are using it to power cars and aircraft within a few mile radius..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...