Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks.  Where do you go on the phone to find that?  I have looked all over bluetooth settings but no luck.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Ezekiel2517 said:

Thanks.  Where do you go on the phone to find that?  I have looked all over bluetooth settings but no luck.

Long hold the Bluetooth icon in the quick access tray.   This brings up the list of your Bluetooth devices, to the far right of the name of your trucks Bluetooth you will see a little icon that looks like gears.  Click that and you will see what you gave the truck access to, usually 3 items:  Calls, Audio, Contact Access.

Edited by Ktoonsez
Posted

Thanks.  I tried that.  It only gives me the option to connect for calls and music.  The weird thing is, I see that contacts connection option for other cars I have synced to, including my 2014 GMC where it worked fine.  It just wont allow me to do it on this truck.

Posted
38 minutes ago, Ezekiel2517 said:

Thanks.  I tried that.  It only gives me the option to connect for calls and music.  The weird thing is, I see that contacts connection option for other cars I have synced to, including my 2014 GMC where it worked fine.  It just wont allow me to do it on this truck.

Very wierd.   Only thing I would try next is to "Forget" the truck in Bluetooth list and re-add it.

Posted
6 hours ago, Ktoonsez said:

Very wierd.   Only thing I would try next is to "Forget" the truck in Bluetooth list and re-add it.

I am having same problem with my Galaxy S8.  IOS will not import contacts from phone.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Vicarod said:

I am having same problem with my Galaxy S8.  IOS will not import contacts from phone.

Mine is IOR, maybe that is the difference.  My phone is Samsung S10 plus and my wifes is S9 plus. 

Edited by Ktoonsez
Posted
42 minutes ago, Ktoonsez said:

Mine is IOR, maybe that is the difference.  My phone is Samsung S10 plus and my wifes is S9 plus. 

When I first bought the truck, I had a loaner (minor dent taken care of in my truck).  That truck had IOR, and my phone contacts sync'd fine.

It's amazing that the IOS will not.

I just went and tried to sync my work phone, which is an iphone 8s...and it won't import those contacts either.

Looks like a trip to the dealer.   I tried working it through with customer service on a chat...no solution.

I suspect this is going to lead to a new infotainment system in the long run. 

It's a minor inconvenience...but I do like having it. 

This feature in my 2014 Silverado worked fine.

Posted
4 hours ago, Vicarod said:

When I first bought the truck, I had a loaner (minor dent taken care of in my truck).  That truck had IOR, and my phone contacts sync'd fine.

It's amazing that the IOS will not.

I just went and tried to sync my work phone, which is an iphone 8s...and it won't import those contacts either.

Looks like a trip to the dealer.   I tried working it through with customer service on a chat...no solution.

I suspect this is going to lead to a new infotainment system in the long run. 

It's a minor inconvenience...but I do like having it. 

This feature in my 2014 Silverado worked fine.

Damn, I had a loaner with the IOS for 2 days, guess I should have paired with it to see.  My 2017 with Nav worked flawless too as you stated in your 2014.   Seems like they went waaaaay backwards.   I can tell you my IOR in the 2019 is complete garbage, always locking up and rebooting it self which causes all the buttons in the center to stop working, so at least you guys on IOS don't have to worry about that.  Also anyone with the IOR reading this I have had my car at service and there is no firmware update available or bulletins so we are stuck with this piece of crap device/firmware from 2014.   Anyone finds a way to get to IOS from an existing IOR I have my ears wide open ?

 

Posted

It even comes up with a "button" to press to send a signal to the phone to share contacts but it does nothing. kind of annoying.

  • Sad 1
Posted

Hi everyone,

 

Long time; hope all is well.

 

2019 Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 here.

 

Truck was calling for a software update, so I updated to V805.1.

 

Unfortunately, I’m now receiving a SD Card Error each time I try to use the navigation system.

 

Pretty frustrating. Can someone please help.

 

Thank you very much.

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, dbs600 said:

Hi everyone,

 

Long time; hope all is well.

 

2019 Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 here.

 

Truck was calling for a software update, so I updated to V805.1.

 

Unfortunately, I’m now receiving a SD Card Error each time I try to use the navigation system.

 

Pretty frustrating. Can someone please help.

 

Thank you very much.

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

oh god please dont tell me this is the same problem i have in my 2017 CTS-V if this is the case the problem started with IOS 13.x the nav locks up and the system reboots.

try this, turn off your bluetooth on your i-phone see if it boots up ok. then try turning bluetooth on. take a quick drive. if its the same issue we cadillac owners are having then i highly recommend nobody do this upgrade until i fix is out! the only way i can use my system in the caddy is over the USB connection and carplay. otherwise the systrem reboots and goes bonkers. also my caddy display looks just like that, the temp reading goes to - - and sometimes it reads in C verses F

Edited by bass mechanic
Posted

How do you determine what version of software you have? I looked in system>setting>about, but it don't see anywhere where it says"805.1", "803.2", "206.X" .......

Posted
How do you determine what version of software you have? I looked in system>setting>about, but it don't see anywhere where it says"805.1", "803.2", "206.X" .......

3e754bcc1d6fa2b0b56713ff6f069033.jpg

6a8bf860d2b75924fdcdcab9b0af00ca.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...