Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, TweetybyrdRT said:

So far I only have three issues:

1:  There has got to be a way to disable the auto shutoff for good.

 

 

 

Check out the auto stop eliminator. you need to remove the dash but it works like a charm! 10$ off right now too

 

https://www.autostopeliminator.com/collections/autostop-eliminators-for-gm-vehicles/products/2019-silverado-sierra-autostop-eliminator

Posted
On 12/4/2019 at 5:34 PM, TweetybyrdRT said:

 

2:  Is the software available to upgrade my infotainment 3+ system to have navigation?  if so the dealer parts and service guys don't know about it.

 

Carplay or AA will get the GPS from you phone onto the screen.

Posted

Truck sat outside for about 11 hours last night when it was negative 4. Started with zero issue. Had #1 fuel in it

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted
Anyone with an AT4 3.0?  I have one on order and curious what real world fuel mileage is.
Granted mine is not a true trail boss, my pickup has the same stance with a 2" level and 2" rear block and I do have a little larger your with the 275/70/18. Did a few hundred miles this weekend and with speeds around 67 I was getting 25 mpg and speeds at 80 was getting around 18. Now this is according to the DIC and I know my speedo is about 3 mph low. (Speeds listed where according to speedometer) Truck was also running #1 fuel as temps are getting cold here. Should note that during this trip there where always heavy crosswinds, it if North Dakota after all.

Was expecting a bit more, may end up switching to a lighter tire come spring and I know with #2 fuel in driving around town with a lot of idling due to winter weather I have been averaging 22 which I am appreciating.

Have about 4500 miles in my truck.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted

The 3.0 starts when its cold; that's great. The engine is designed to do that to compete with gassers. You can do that every now and again but PLUG IT IN. The engine has an aluminum block with steel sleeves. The heat expansion varies greatly between the alloys and you will cause premature engine wear. In addition, the bearing tolerances are very close and don't like super cold oil. Buy an outdoor timer and set it to turn on 5 hours before you plan on driving.

Posted

Drove the new Ram Eco today, after having driven the new Silverado and F150 diesels and have to say the Ram ride and seat comfort is superior to the other two. With that said my last Ram had a lot of glitches and soured me on the brand.  Did 20 mile highway test loops (70 to 75 MPH) on all three and they were pretty close (mid 20s) but the Ram did best, all crew cab 4x4s.  

Posted

3.0L Duramax here. Been a fantastic setup for a commuter. I currently have about 1500 miles on the odometer and driving into Northern Virginia daily, I'm averaging 26-27mpg consistently despite frequent stop-and-go travel. I'm easily cruising 500+ miles per tank (~$50 to fill up at $2.85/gal) and refueling every 2 weeks with a 50 mile round trip commute. I have managed to get it up to 31.5mpg (see below). I seem to get better fuel economy on rolling back country roads rather than out on the open highway. Driving 70+ mph on the highway and I never see over 25mpg, but it's not overly flat terrain around here.

 

I had one hiccup where I started the truck remotely and it stalled the first week I owned the vehicle. A quick check with the OBD2 reader (code P2B60) and a phone call to the dealer, they told me to clear the code and call back if it occurs again. I haven't had a single problem since. 

 

I really do not understand the auto-stop feature on a diesel engine though. Historically, isn't it more economical to leave a diesel engine idling rather than start and stopping? The onboard computer disagrees with my assessment though, and although annoying at first, I've gotten used to the feature. Remote start and turning off the auto-start, idling will easily kill the fuel economy computer readout...

 

Compared to my last truck, a 1998 Silverado Z71, I have no regrets. She was a good old truck with a lot of stories, and that alone was enough to keep me from looking at the competitors.

 

IMG_8389.thumb.JPG.c5905bd043cb7a4b8112cd28dcf684a2.JPG

  • Like 2
Posted

I have a 2020 GMC SLT 4x4 with the 3.0 Duramax. Bought Oct 29 and driven only in the cold Canadian fall/winter weather. I have driven mostly diesel vehicles over the last 20 years, but the ride was getting too harsh in the 2500 series. This is a pleasant to exceptional ride and handling vehicle. It starts very well in the cold, as low as -25 Celsius (-13F)without being plugged in. I have 4000Klm so far and economy from day one averages 11.1 L/100KM (22.1 miles to US gal.) Best 100 KLM is 8.3L/100KM (28.3 miles to US gal) 

 

This is the best truck I have had in my time driving. I recommend it be considered by most everyone needing full size towing, comfort and economy. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Ugh. I'm torn. I'm shopping for a new truck that will see daily driver use all winter long, about 70 miles/day (traffic varies between light interstate and heavy stop and go at times).. I was looking hard at the 5.3 until someone reminded me about the new 3.0 diesel. Never owned a diesel before, I don't tow hardly at all. The potential for increased fuel economy is tempting (even with the Sierra's slightly lower numbers, but the complexity of emissions on these new diesels scare me a bit. What would you owners offer as advice or personal experience? ...and how can one get the 3.0 to be louder? lol

Posted

Top end power, the kind that GM delivers with the LS/LT  engines is the very reason I’ve passed on diesel options in previous vehicle purchases.This 3.0 duramax IMO gives me enough highway hp, and all the  torque you could ask for for towing or around town.Bottom line this is a quick truck around town, and sips fuel doing it.its the best 1/2 ton diesel imo..I drove the others,and wouldn’t consider them a “buy” solely for there performance  characteristics . Just my humble opinion 

Posted
11 hours ago, toasty said:

Ugh. I'm torn. I'm shopping for a new truck that will see daily driver use all winter long, about 70 miles/day (traffic varies between light interstate and heavy stop and go at times).. I was looking hard at the 5.3 until someone reminded me about the new 3.0 diesel. Never owned a diesel before, I don't tow hardly at all. The potential for increased fuel economy is tempting (even with the Sierra's slightly lower numbers, but the complexity of emissions on these new diesels scare me a bit. What would you owners offer as advice or personal experience? ...and how can one get the 3.0 to be louder? lol

 

I'm in the dream shopping phase.  My thing is that I'm a bit skeptical this truck is getting as good of MPG as it is rated for.  Obviously we've seen TFL, and I saw two other Private owners (actual buyers) of the truck do highway loops at 70mph and did achieve 30 or 31mpg.  Then I see other people on here going 75 - 80mpg getting 24 or 25.  My truck gets 18mpg at that speed. I suppose this is still a good improvement at 6 to 7mpg minimum. Over a 500 mile trip that is 7.7 gallons saved and 23$ (comparing to 6.2L premium fuel) or 18$ saved on regular fuel.

 

I suppose at the end of the day it is still a great purchase, assuming long term ownership doesn't have any problems.

 

But then @becker87 says he installs a leveling kit and assuming an E rated tire slightly larger than stock and gets 18 mpg lol so it seems way too easy to kill the mpg on this truck.  Leveling my truck with a 1 inch taller tire netted a 1 - 1.5mpg loss on highway, however I did stick with a P rated all terrain.

 

Honestly I would opt for the RST Silverado vs the Sierra simply because one of the major factors is the MPG it gets.  I don't love the new sierra enough to already be a few MPG behind the silverado before I do any mods.

 

3 hours ago, Jim71 said:

Top end power, the kind that GM delivers with the LS/LT  engines is the very reason I’ve passed on diesel options in previous vehicle purchases.This 3.0 duramax IMO gives me enough highway hp, and all the  torque you could ask for for towing or around town.Bottom line this is a quick truck around town, and sips fuel doing it.its the best 1/2 ton diesel imo..I drove the others,and wouldn’t consider them a “buy” solely for there performance  characteristics . Just my humble opinion 

 

Agreed!  Did you see The Fast Lane Truck run it against the new EcoDiesel?  That EcoDiesel is sooo slow lol it lost by truck lengths.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 800 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I usually do as well or better than the sticker for mileage. Usually better going west than east. North then South. Wind makes a difference. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But it did dawn on me I’m going by the vehicle calculation. Now that would be interesting.
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
    • Glad you had success with it. I did as well, but about 5-6 months later it returned. Tried again, same result. This was after the dealer made several attempts and never even got it to slow down.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...