Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I own a 2019 GMC SLT Sierra with a multi-pro tailgate.  The opening between the main tailgate and the interior tailgate allows water, dirt and snow to come through the 3/4 inch crack between the main and interior tailgate.  The very top lip of the tailgate between the two tailgates has a huge opening which continues to the bottom of the interior tailgate.  GM failed install weather stripping or a seal in this area, so water, dirt and snow will seep through easily through the large crack.  I have a Lomar Tonneau cover and when I went through a car wash yesterday, my interior box bed was wet about 2 ft in from the exterior bed.  If you place a flashlight inside your truck bed and have a Tonneau cover you will see why this crack between the two tailgates allows so much water into the truck bed.  If you view the photos attached, I have circled in red the area that a weather stripping seal is needed.  My GM dealership told me, if I wanted a dryer truck bed, I should have ordered a Yukon.  All owners of a 2019 or 2020 GM with a multi-pro tailgate need to express our disappointment with this design and demand that GM fix the design flaw.  

 

Chev owners don't know how lucky they are not to have a multi-pro tailgate.  I understand chev will be adding the multi-pro tailgate in 2021.-do=add#.url-do=add#.url550453139_Tailgatesealneeded.JPG.b01f46def487f4342ebbe8a9829267d1.JPG  

Tailgate seal - missing area.JPG

Tailgate missing seal.JPG

Posted

Not sure who "our" is but I think you are the first to post of water intrusion with the multi pro gate here.  No pickup truck boxes are entirely waterproof to begin with.  Most are open under the bed rails for proper air flow/venting and even the regular tailgates aren't waterproof.   

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Of course I understand, but you have to admit that water would not seep into the bed from the bottom, like it does now from the top with a Multi-pro poor design tailgate.  Please admit the multi-pro design is not the best for those of us that add Tonneau covers as we would like to keep items in the truck bed dry.   Go back to the factory and figure out a fix.

 

Thank you,

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, newdude said:

Not sure who "our" is but I think you are the first to post of water intrusion with the multi pro gate here.  No pickup truck boxes are entirely waterproof to begin with.  Most are open under the bed rails for proper air flow/venting and even the regular tailgates aren't waterproof.   

 

Agree.  My 2020 Chev gets wet about 2' into the box as well after going through a high pressure wash.  I have the Embark cover.

  • Like 1
Posted

I sometimes wonder if I made a mistake not getting the GMC. Now not so sure. 

Posted

I don't understand why you think GM is responsible for your bed not staying dry when that is never a design criteria of theirs, at least not from the truck design side.  The bed is designed to be open and get wet.  If you want it dry that would fall on whoever designed your cover for covering up all of the other "cracks" and providing a solution for that.  

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, DianaNeal39 said:

Of course I understand, but you have to admit that water would not seep into the bed from the bottom, like it does now from the top with a Multi-pro poor design tailgate.  Please admit the multi-pro design is not the best for those of us that add Tonneau covers as we would like to keep items in the truck bed dry.   Go back to the factory and figure out a fix. 

 

Thank you,

 

GM will be of zero help as well.  Especially since you have an aftermarket tonneau cover.  If you had a GM one they might express some concern, but having an aftermarket cover is ripe for the ol' "its aftermarket so it might not be sealing properly".    

 

My Colorado would get a bit of water with a GM tonneau, no multi pro gate.  My K2 would get a bit of water spray with a GM tonneau, no multi pro.  Its not a multi pro gate only thing.  Watch for the aftermarket to have a seal kit as the aftermarket makes tailgate seal kits for regular gates as it is. 

Edited by newdude
  • Like 2
Posted

You can buy bed or tailgate seal from a few different manufacturers in bulk rolls from 10' to 100' for about $2 to $3 per foot if you really want to completely seal it from water or dust. My GMC dealer offered a tailgate seal which they sell for the gap between the bottom of the bed and bottom of the tailgate when I bought my GMC tonneau cover for my 2019 Sierra Denali with Multi-Pro tailgate, but I refused as I wanted any water that may be present in the bed to drain out there as designed. None of my other trucks (Ford, GMC or Chevy) ever had a tailgate seal and they all got some very minor amount of water in them when I went through a car wash but not otherwise, and it was easily wiped dry with a towel. However my 2005 Tahoe SUV did have a seal around the rear tailgate door and did not let water, dust or even air in it. This is not a design flaw and GM will not be changing it but instead will leave it up the end user to add whatever bed or tailgate seal they prefer, or not, as they and all other truck manufacturers always have for nearly 100 years. 

Posted

When I first saw the prototype for this new gate, my first thought wasn't, "wow, what a useful innovation". Instead it was, "great, another crevice to collect dirt, debris, water and rust."

 

I'm not surprised in the least.

  • Like 2
Posted

It doesn't work how you want it to so it is a flaw? If GM wanted it to be perfectly sealed, they would have. A flaw is an overlook in the purpose or structure, the tailgate operates as designed. There was 0% of the design attributed to sealing the bed, has been that was with every tailgate from every manufacturer since the tailgate and pick up was invented. You want it sealed, go buy a roll or rubber and do it. Even the normal tailgate when the pressure washer hits from the rear a good amount of water comes in the bed, the gaps on the sides are large. Not sure why everyone deems something a flaw or problem if it doesn't operate the way they think it should (IE the drop down hitting a hitch), it is designed to work as such. The regular tailgates aren't sealed, no reason the mini multi-pro would be too. Should probably rename this thread so as not to mislead people...

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I have had many trucks in the past and none of them sealed perfectly to keep water out with a tonneau cover. None of them let much water in either. My new AT4 is exactly the same as all of the others. It let in exactly the same amount as my others. I have the gm rev cover on my AT4.

Posted

I have the Retrax ProXR and have been working on getting it as waterproof as possible.  Most of the water I have is coming in through that gap between the 2 sections of the tailgate.  I picked up this weatherstripping from Lowes and put some at the very top on the plastic cap between the 2 tailgates.  That stopped a large amount of the water coming back there.  I think I still have some coming in between the larger gate and the bed on the sides - still working on that piece.  I also have a Rok Block tailgate seal, but haven't installed yet - waiting to get the water coming in from the top addressed before I seal up the main exit path for it.     

 

https://www.lowes.com/pd/M-D-13-ft-x-1-in-Expand-N-Seal-Foam-Window-Weatherstrip/1000460601

Posted

Dave,

 

Could you send a photo, as to how you installed the weather stripping on the top?  I was in my GM dealership today and asked them to discuss my concerns with GM.

 

Thank you, 

Posted (edited)

Any Sierra trim can be ordered without a multipro tailgate. 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...