Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Seems like so old as the others have a button to lock. Rather then slip and hope for system to work. 

Posted

I'll take a mechanical locker over and electric solenoid or air system or valve pushing  something in place any day.

 

It's simple and it works that's why they have stuck with it.

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

The beginning of the end for the G80 will likely start with the new Silverado ZRX / ZR2, where they will undoubtedly have a new front locking diff, plus likely an electronic locker in the rear. This is just my W.A.G.

 

https://www.motor1.com/news/376084/chevy-silverado-zr2/ 

 

Otherwise, I'm with others here who like the G80. It's always there when you need it. You never have to stop, push a button, then wait before continuing to climb out of a jam. 

 

For the majority of truck owners, a G80 is better suited for them. For the minority who do more purposeful off-roading, an electronic locker would be better. But most truck owners do not engage in off-roading very often, so the use of a rear locker is more frequent in pulling your boat out of a lake, getting over a curb, starting on a slick surface, etc. 

Edited by econometrics
  • Like 1
Posted

I like the G80 a lot, but a front locker would be helpful.  The only problem I have with the G80 is that is stays locked longer than I like.  

Posted

Never understood why people bag on the G80.

 

Its perfect for a factory locker when you know what it is and how it works.

 

Ie: Dont baby it.

 

With an electronic locker most people new to it would wind up in a ditch trying to take their first corner in the rain.

  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, oldmann said:

 only problem I have with the G80 is that is stays locked longer than I like.  

I am new to the G80, coming from a f/r open differential 4x4, it sucked. 

 

Just curious how you know, or what is the negative of having it stay locked longer longer than you would like? 

Posted

Many GM's with the G80. No problems with the G80 at all. What's the big beef?

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, smit303 said:

Many GM's with the G80. No problems with the G80 at all. What's the big beef?

Ditto.  Don't fix what isn't broken.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

There is zero beef with G80. It’s a solid system. This is my 5th GM truck so I know they are good systems. just saying it would be nice to be able to control it yourself. 

Edited by f8l vnm
Posted

The G80 in my 2016 has been good for me at almost 87k miles...

Posted
11 hours ago, f8l vnm said:

There is zero beef with G80. It’s a solid system. This is my 5th GM truck so I know they are good systems. just saying it would be nice to be able to control it yourself. 

You can.

 

Use your right foot on the long pedal.

  • Haha 2
Posted

I have not experienced the G80 yet but I did my research.  Apparently it is only active below 40 mph due to the centrifugal components inside.  I also heard that they have a tendency to break apart and damage the ring/pinion/spiders.

On the other hand I do have experience with the Ford 8.8's clutch based limited slip.  I rebuilt one in a Crown Victoria.  That's a good limited slip in my experience.  No funky business except friction material, spacers, and a spring in the middle to provide the initial pre-load.

I'm sure they all work relatively fine, otherwise GM would not have used the G80 for so long.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLgze5NR6Ks

Posted
5 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

I have not experienced the G80 yet but I did my research.  Apparently it is only active below 40 mph due to the centrifugal components inside.  I also heard that they have a tendency to break apart and damage the ring/pinion/spiders.

On the other hand I do have experience with the Ford 8.8's clutch based limited slip.  I rebuilt one in a Crown Victoria.  That's a good limited slip in my experience.  No funky business except friction material, spacers, and a spring in the middle to provide the initial pre-load.

I'm sure they all work relatively fine, otherwise GM would not have used the G80 for so long.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLgze5NR6Ks

I thought it was 20mph?

 

In any case that video tells the story pretty well.

 

 

Make the speed differential between the two rear tires equal to 100rpm's under XX mph and it will lock in no problem. The bump/tire chirp you will hear and feel is a non issue unless you are concerned about the surface under the tire with traction.

 

To get it to unlock if it does become stuck, just back and fill a couple times with the steering turned.

 

My 2001 has seen hard service and I had zero problems with the diff even doing things I know I shouldn't have.

 

Jackrabbit starts? Yes please! 190K on that truck and the last thing I worry about if the rear dif.

Posted (edited)

That 40 mph figure might be wrong, I don't know.  I was watching this build yesterday on Power Nation, below.  At 12:40 he starts talking about the G80 and mentions that it becomes an open differential at 45 mph.  Of course the show is like a commercial, as they advertise for manufacturers and sellers of upgrades, so, take his trash talking with a gain of salt.

At any rate, the Ford Ranger seemed odd.  If it had the limited slip I would have felt it should have done better with their tests based upon my own ownership of a Crown Victoria with a Ford 8.8 3.55L.  I rebuilt with stock clutches, non-carbon fiber, and even reused the original S spring and it was a great limited slip.  The spring is a lot beefier in the F150s and Explorers but really doesn't do anything beyond initial preload.  A lot of people would "upgrade" to the truck's version of the S spring thinking it would do wonders but in reality it was just for the initial wheel spin before centrifugal force takes effect and compresses the clutch packs.

I never spun out, either, although in slick conditions I was mindful of throttle application during turns.  I suppose the G80 is built for idiots and soccer moms, which is probably true.
 

 

Edited by BlaineBug

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...