Jump to content

Naked, Boards, Bars, or Steps (POLL)


NITTY

Naked, Boards, Bars or Steps  

23 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

What is your preference for visual/looks (not functionality)?  I'm on the shorter side so the bars I had on my 2007 were nice for getting in and out but I think I like it naked for visual.  Some of them are pretty ugly.  This is a weekend ride so it's not a big deal to have to hop in and out once in awhile.  I only have a 2" level on the front so it ain't that bad.  

  • NITTY changed the title to Naked, Boards, Bars, or Steps (POLL)
Posted

Naked all the way. Running boards scream "old man".

If you can't get in your truck on your own, its too high IMO.

Posted

Naked DEFINITELY looks better!!

I liked mine more without steps, but this 5' wife of mine and two kids under 8yo needed some assistance getting in [emoji2367]9027e532338b3f4fc502d39bce61ed12.jpg

 

I did go the extra mile and added the articulating ones tho [emoji1531]

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Naked 100%. They do make some nice looking steps now days and the amps are the best of both worlds (at a price). But looks alone in my opinion are best without them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I'd probably rather go naked but I like the extra protection the running boards give from rocks off the front tires. I also kind of need them to get in.2e64588adba35997f1b232c04b3635a7.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Posted

I removed the factory boards cause I like em naked but my wife complained about getting in it so I went with some Rough Country step bars that tuck up closer than the boards, the Amp power steps are the ticket but I can't pull the trigger on those for some reason yet lol

20200711_141401.jpg

Posted

Looks like most of you are on board with my preference.  Kincer - If I did end up doing anything it was going be something very similar to what you have.  I like how they tuck close to the body and you can't see the brackets.

 

I think I need to paint all those black plastic inserts in the rocker panels though because that doesn't quite look right with a white truck.  They really stick out.

Posted

I don't like the looks of boards either, but being on the short side doesn't help at all, so I went with AMP Power steps. Best of both worlds.

 

DjHVASv.jpg

Posted

So I voted on the poll before I read the post....

 

Looks, naked is best. 

 

But, I like the step for getting in, and don't think it necessarily looks bad either. 

Posted

Naked looks best! Running the Amp Extremes for that reason plus i'm short. ?

20200114_170415.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone,   For anyone looking at roof-mounted lighting for the Hummer EV, we wanted to share our M&R Automotive 50" PRO Roof Light Bar for the 2022+ GMC Hummer EV.   The curved 50" bar sits close to the windshield rather than sticking way up above the roofline. The mounting position is designed to keep the setup relatively streamlined while minimizing wind noise and maintaining full use of the factory windshield wipers.   A few details:   50" curved PRO light bar Fits 2022–2026 GMC Hummer EV Spot + driving beam pattern TIR optics White main beam Amber DRL backglow Approximately 15,410 measured lumens through the lens Mounts to factory accessory locations No cutting or drilling required Wiring runs down the A-pillar toward the AUX connections Designed to minimize wind noise Lifetime warranty Off-road use only     The 50" is an interesting middle ground for anyone who wants the visibility and mounting position of a roof bar without stepping all the way up to the larger 60" setup. For the Hummer EV owners here, would you go with the 50" for the lower-profile look or step up to the full 60"?  
    • My son got a hatchback withe the aero package for like 17k new. Great little car with amazing MPH
    • Yeah, I've given up years ago with that! I was able to load a few when I first joined the site sometime around '07. Then after maybe 20 pics, it said I exceeded the limit. Now every pic I try to post says I've "exceeded 1mb".   ONE MB??? That's Windows 95 ******, lol!! 
    • I get the same results with pictures. Then I figure it out. Then I forget. Screw it.
    • I guess I'm the only one on this forum who can't get effing pics to load here! Do you have to resize them to post, or am I just blocked from uploads?   I have the same luck with automotive electronics ... but this is the ONLY site on the net that I have this problem!   I'd post pics of what I'm working on ... but I CAN'T! 🤬       Just fabbed up the kickdown cable (had to extend the cable mount WAAAY out from the throttle shaft to get a full pull), and parts arrived for the fuel lines on the 940 carb conversion project. Should be able to drive this thing by the end of the day. If not for work, I'd have had this thing done SIX weeks ago.   Got the jetting sorted out last week. Had a real bad tip-in bog that I couldn't seem to correct. Friggin float height was over 11mm too HIGH! eBay purchase, so no wonder everything is screwed up right out of the box! I ended up with a larger dual-squirt accelerator pump jet anyway instead of the single. Also moved the 70 primary idle jet (4 sizes too big out of the box) to the secondary idle circuit, and installed a 57 in the primary. Runs great on the fuel bottle!    Still using the computer for ignition. Going to drive it first and see if I want to go through the project of installing an intermediate shaft with a distributor drive gear, so I can install a block-mounted distributor and run points, 100% computer free. I should do that anyway just from a simplicity / reliability / tunability standpoint. The electronics left me stranded last year a couple times! I can't tweak the timing to my liking right now because of the computer. Tried twisting the cam-driven distributor already ... and the damned thing just reverts back to where it was! That's infuriating. But if it runs well enough I might save that for next season.   Just driving it in and out of the shop to work on other projects, it feels 1,000% more responsive with the carburetor. Also fires MUCH faster when cranking. Can't wait to drive it and see if I got more than 114 ponies, lolol.   Hopefully these don't go 404 like the last post ... https://postimg.cc/gallery/MjhrmZS   Seems like that site went back to dial-up internet! Maybe they'll fix that some day ...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...