Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Still shopping around for an SLT/5.3/4x4/Crew Cab/5.5FT Bed. The limited supply and high demand for SLT's isn't helping too much.

Everywhere i look online, it seems there is a ton of Denali vehicles to choose from.

I'm assuming nobody wants to buy one due to their $70,000 sticker.

Why are the Denali's $8k+ over a fully loaded SLT?

Doesn't that seem like overkill for the same truck with a little extra leather?

Posted
38 minutes ago, bigRand said:

Still shopping around for an SLT/5.3/4x4/Crew Cab/5.5FT Bed. The limited supply and high demand for SLT's isn't helping too much.

Everywhere i look online, it seems there is a ton of Denali vehicles to choose from.

I'm assuming nobody wants to buy one due to their $70,000 sticker.

Why are the Denali's $8k+ over a fully loaded SLT?

Doesn't that seem like overkill for the same truck with a little extra leather?

You can find many Denalis for sale online under $60K with the rebates out there right now. 


The biggest reason the Denalis cost so much more than the SLTs is because of the tech packages you can slap on them. You also get Magnaride with the Denali, which is a big selling point for most of the high-end / luxury truck buyers. 

  • Like 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, econometrics said:

You can find many Denalis for sale online under $60K with the rebates out there right now. 


The biggest reason the Denalis cost so much more than the SLTs is because of the tech packages you can slap on them. You also get Magnaride with the Denali, which is a big selling point for most of the high-end / luxury truck buyers. 

Exactly the reasons why I purchased the Denali 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, bigRand said:

Doesn't that seem like overkill for the same truck with a little extra leather?

Don't forget the chrome.

 

I agree with you, jack up the price for some extra leather and shiny chrome. The Denali doesn't perform any differently or better than my LT.

 

But I think I know why:

 

1861667528_ptbarnum.jpg.e2367e34125f1c22259faf5535aba8b6.jpg

Edited by aseibel
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

You know the word "Denali" means the "High One", right?  No, seriously.  

 

GM openly admits their current marketing strategy is "If it's really worth $50K, we'll put a $70K sticker on it and hope to sell it for at least $60K.  And it seems to be mostly working for them--must be a whole lotta people robbing banks out there.  

Edited by MaverickZ71
Posted
3 hours ago, bigRand said:

Still shopping around for an SLT/5.3/4x4/Crew Cab/5.5FT Bed. The limited supply and high demand for SLT's isn't helping too much.

Everywhere i look online, it seems there is a ton of Denali vehicles to choose from.

I'm assuming nobody wants to buy one due to their $70,000 sticker.

Why are the Denali's $8k+ over a fully loaded SLT?

Doesn't that seem like overkill for the same truck with a little extra leather?

If you're willing to travel from CA to ID, there are several SLTs here like you describe.  I bought mine 2 weeks ago, same config, about 12K off MSRP.

Posted

It's because people continue to pay that crazy high amount for them. Doesn't matter if you have the money or not, people will go into debt just to have the most expensive truck on the market.

  • Like 2
Posted

I mostly like the Denali, but in no way does it live up to it’s image as of now. If you can wait a year, wait. Otherwise do your best to avoid sitting in a 2021 Yukon SLE that’s 20k cheaper and nicer in just about every way. Talk about a kick in the balls.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

It's the same reason the SLT costs more than an SLE. Styling and bells and whistles. 

 

I found a loaded SLT with 1,500 miles on it for 42,500 OTD so I drive a SLT. But I can also call a spade a spade and agree that the Denali is the better looking truck. When I bought my truck you could find a Denali for under 60k but I couldn't justify 17.5k for Amp research steps, HUD, slightly better gauge cluster and a slightly nicer grill so I didn't. In all actuality if the Denali was only 8k more, I would be driving a Denali. 

 

The better question is how does an AT4 cost more than a SLT? And how does Chevy even sell half tons this generation? A loaded SLT is the second nicest truck on the road right now, but there is no doubt that the Denali is slightly nicer. And 8k is what $75 a month difference on a car payment? Not that big a difference in the grand scheme of things.

Edited by superhighsierra
Posted

huge profit margins on high end trims.....if you really look at it and break it down its pretty easy to see where they make bank on these.....it isnt proportionate but hey if you got the cash and dont care ****** it.....cant take it with you and be hard to add it later....

 

 

Posted

My Denali had a MSRP of 65k but got it for 57k.

That was in my price range and love the truck. Next up would have been the AT4.

Only truck that my wife feels compared to her Lexus SUV in luxury features.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

I mostly like the Denali, but in no way does it live up to it’s image as of now. If you can wait a year, wait. Otherwise do your best to avoid sitting in a 2021 Yukon SLE that’s 20k cheaper and nicer in just about every way. Talk about a kick in the balls.

This is excellent advice. And true. Wait for a Denali interior refresh. The 2021 Yukon Denali interior is legit. 

Posted
10 hours ago, bigRand said:

Still shopping around for an SLT/5.3/4x4/Crew Cab/5.5FT Bed. The limited supply and high demand for SLT's isn't helping too much.

Everywhere i look online, it seems there is a ton of Denali vehicles to choose from.

I'm assuming nobody wants to buy one due to their $70,000 sticker.

Why are the Denali's $8k+ over a fully loaded SLT?

Doesn't that seem like overkill for the same truck with a little extra leather?

In Tulsa you can pick up a new AT4 with premium package for 49K, has 95% of what Denali has but with a 2" lift.

Posted

comparing what one would pay for a vehicle is like comparing apples to oranges, opinions will always vary.  Everyone I talk to about my trucks asks me why I bought it over a dodge when they have better interiors? Yes Dodge has a better interior than GMC, but in comparison to what my German vehicle interiors offer, its not even comparable.  Hands down better than anything found in North America.  It is all subjective.  Would I pay full MRSP? **** no! but give me a deal (in my opinion) and I will take it.  Mag ride makes a world of difference to me along with a few other features, but like I said that's just my opinion.

Posted
13 hours ago, bigRand said:

Still shopping around for an SLT/5.3/4x4/Crew Cab/5.5FT Bed. The limited supply and high demand for SLT's isn't helping too much.

Everywhere i look online, it seems there is a ton of Denali vehicles to choose from.

I'm assuming nobody wants to buy one due to their $70,000 sticker.

Why are the Denali's $8k+ over a fully loaded SLT?

Doesn't that seem like overkill for the same truck with a little extra leather?

It's a lot more than that.  Most folks who buy them don't consider Denalis over priced either.  When was the last time you read one of the vehicle brochures?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...