Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This is interesting with only towing about 7k for it to over heat.  I remember a little while back on these forums there was a discussion about the trans cooler ( and lack there of)  any longer on the Trucks. In your opinion is this all due to the Trans cooler ?

( FYI for some of you homers , the Ford overheated too but at least that was a little closer to the rated towing capacity. 

I also think This hot weather is baking some of the US . MY personal 6.2 2019 Sierra has been pretty darn good when i have hauled big loads up hills ( but not towing , rather payload hauling) 

 

 

 

Edited by f8l vnm
Posted (edited)

I took my buddies and my SXS's from St louis to Moab Utah last year at the end of august the weather was hot A.F. but did not have any issues with heating up. Mine is a 6.2 max tow and hauling 7K+ lbs. 2 sxs on the trailer plus a bed full of luggage, spare parts and tools. we went through colorado springs / monarch pass ( i think) on the way there as 70 was closed due to fires, took 70 back through denver on the way home and didn't have any temperature or power problems either way. 

20210701_204940.jpg

Edited by Greyhound6.2
  • Like 1
Posted

I would pretty much expect it to get hot due to the steep uphill at 25mph in 90+ degree heat trans shifting alot and very little air blowing through the cooler.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I thought I read that it got up to 300°F. Crazy. It seems everyone is going to higher transmission operating temps, around 200°F. I don’t understand not having an external air cooler up front in addition to the oil heat exchanger on the transmission itself. 
 

Do they think we all just use our half tons for gettin groceries? 

Edited by Chebby
Posted

How many miles did it have when they started towing? Owners manual says do not tow for the first 500 miles. Odometer shows 519 miles in video curious if that has something to do with it

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Chebby said:

I thought I read that it got up to 300°F. Crazy. It seems everyone is going to higher transmission operating temps, around 200°F. I don’t understand not having an external air cooler up front in addition to the oil heat exchanger on the transmission itself. 
 

Do they think we all just use our half tons for gettin groceries? 

 

Unfortunately most do, hence the massaging seats and 22" wheels and leveled stances; it is an image purchase by many...

 

Tyler

Edited by Amcguy1970
  • Like 1
Posted

I remember after buying my 01 GMC 1/2 ton. I dueled  it. When home loaded up wife and luggage, hooked up to a uhaul car carrier. I loaded with a replacement part that  was 3 thousand lbs. My break in and trip started. The trip was from the Houston area over the Colorado passes to north California. Dropped off part. South California to pick up broken part. Interstate 10 home. The only difference between this and other trips I didn’t have time to install my tool box and tools. I never had an over heat problem. This 01 wasn’t anything special. Didn’t have a towing package or gear.   I would think they’d be tougher now. Guess not.

Posted

I still think this is a random isolated case as i have never had any issues with over hearing on any of my own personal GM trucks and then 50+ GM Trucks we have in our farm fleet. 

One thing i don't know is , did they really take the trans cooler out ?

Posted

I would venture a guess that on steep grades and very low speeds like they were driving they would be better served in four low to keep engine RPM up. This keeps the hydraulic pump in the transmission spinning faster and pushing more fluid.

From owners manual:
4-low
This setting engages the front axle and delivers extra torque. Choose 4 low when driving off-road in deep sand, deep mud, or deep snow, and while climbing or descending steep hills. While driving in 4 low, keep vehicle speed below 72 km/h (45 mph).

  • Confused 2
Posted
1 hour ago, calgator73 said:

I would venture a guess that on steep grades and very low speeds like they were driving they would be better served in four low to keep engine RPM up. This keeps the hydraulic pump in the transmission spinning faster and pushing more fluid.

From owners manual:
4-low
This setting engages the front axle and delivers extra torque. Choose 4 low when driving off-road in deep sand, deep mud, or deep snow, and while climbing or descending steep hills. While driving in 4 low, keep vehicle speed below 72 km/h (45 mph).

Why use 4 low just to keep engine rpm up?? Couldn’t you just do that by manually selecting gears?

 

Whats the manual say about driving in 4 low on dry pavement?

Posted

I’ve got a Max tow 2020 6.2 and pull a heavier travel trailer 8500# with more drag because of surface area and have pulled the Ike gauntlet and other step pulls in Colorado last summer and never had that problem.  In fact I was so impressed with how cool the trans stayed. It pulls

the trailer around 150 degrees and never got over 200 on the toughest pulls.  Something wrong with that truck on TFL.  

Posted
On 7/21/2021 at 7:25 AM, Amcguy1970 said:

 

Unfortunately most do, hence the massaging seats and 22" wheels and leveled stances; it is an image purchase by many...

 

Tyler

While I agree the half ton has become a family car but at same time these are also GMs money makers. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Dirk13 said:

Why use 4 low just to keep engine rpm up?? Couldn’t you just do that by manually selecting gears?

 

Whats the manual say about driving in 4 low on dry pavement?

4 Low allows your transmission to pump a larger volume of fluid over a given set of time, resulting in more fluid passing through the transmission oil cooler.  If you are traveling in a straight line up a hill, 4 low would be perfectly fine, but like mentioned above you would need to worry about 4 low if driving on a winding concrete road.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Gangly said:

4 Low allows your transmission to pump a larger volume of fluid over a given set of time, resulting in more fluid passing through the transmission oil cooler.  If you are traveling in a straight line up a hill, 4 low would be perfectly fine, but like mentioned above you would need to worry about 4 low if driving on a winding concrete road.

I think on sunshine canyon drive it's gravel all the way to the top.  Engine wasn't overheating...just the tranny.   I would have hit 4 low.

Posted
16 hours ago, Dirk13 said:

Why use 4 low just to keep engine rpm up?? Couldn’t you just do that by manually selecting gears?

 

Whats the manual say about driving in 4 low on dry pavement?

See gangly's post....in general yes a lower gear will bring rpms up.  Andre says he was running 25-30 mph on sunshine canyon drive which according to google street view is all gravel to the top.  Maintaining low speeds with a high load, high temp and high altitude would tell me to either speed up and lock in a gear so i'm not lugging or...I'm going into 4-low to allow the whole drivetrain to experience a lower perceived load due to torque multiplication and hope for the best.  I bet that tranny was constantly shifting from 1st to 3rd and back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...