Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone know what the factory rear tint on 2022 silverado ltd ltz is? From what I looked up it's 20% but in Kansas legal requirement for rear windows is 35% so I don't think that's correct unless it's different rear tint depending on the state, I'm currently in florida but moving to Kansas next few months so need tint that will be legal there, what are your recommendations?

Posted
8 minutes ago, shewstring said:

That’s the max tint allowed, not the minimum.  It must allow at least 35% light in.  You should be fine.  

It says 20% on my rear windows, doesn't that mean that it only let's 20% of light in which is from the factory and would be illegal in kansas?

Posted

Factory window tint level is compliant for all 50 states as far as I know.  70% or higher light transmittance on the front two and the windshield, rears are 20% transmittance.

 

There is only two rear glass # options, one is standard solar glass, the other privacy glass.  GM also has printed on all glass the transmittance level.

 

Quote

 

#21-NA-152: Information on Glass Ultraviolet (UV) Ray Protection and Tint Percentage - (Jun 28, 2021)

Ultraviolet Ray Protection:

Windshield reduces UV rays down to 4% or less.

Front side door glass reduces UV rays down to 35% or less.

Rear window, doors, or 1/4 glass reduces UV rays down to 35% or less (Without RPO AJ1 or AKO).

Rear window, doors, or 1/4 glass reduces UV rays down to 10% or less if equipped with Privacy Glass (With RPO AJ1 or AKO).

Sunroof reduce to 10% or less.

Tint Percentage:

Windshields are SOLAR glass with a light transmittance of >/=70%.

Front door glass are Solar glass with a light transmission of >/=70%.

Rear door glass, quarter windows and back windows can use either Solar glass (>/=70%) or Privacy glass, which has a light transmittance of (nominally) 20%.

*Basically, if the glass is 'light green' in color, it is solar glass. If it is the dark gray/black glass, it is Privacy glass.

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, newdude said:

Factory window tint level is compliant for all 50 states as far as I know.  70% or higher light transmittance on the front two and the windshield, rears are 20% transmittance.

 

There is only two rear glass # options, one is standard solar glass, the other privacy glass.  GM also has printed on all glass the transmittance level.

 

 

Should I still get clear ceramic or would it make no difference on windshield since it's already uv reducing?

 

And just do enough on the front to get it to match 20% on the rear?

Posted

What is installed from the factory meets all 50 state requirements.  Unless you changed it you are good. 

Posted

I thought you could do anything in the back as long as front is not tinted? 

Posted
12 minutes ago, f8l vnm said:

I thought you could do anything in the back as long as front is not tinted? 

Depends on the state.  I know in PA and NC you can black out the back glass if you wanted too as long has you had the two side mirrors.

Posted

Anything behind the driver can be as dark as you want in all 50 states as long as you have sideview mirrors on both sides anything on driver's side door window and passenger window has to be whatever your state allows.

Posted

*

"If you are in an auto accident that you believe was caused by the other driver’s tinted windows, be sure to take pictures of the car and the scene before the evidence is removed or destroyed. Indeed, whether the windows were tinted could become an important part of the theory of liability that your experienced personal injury attorney uses to help you recover financial damages for your injury."

Posted (edited)

First off the rear windows are not tinted!  They are just dyed class. They reject no heat or harmful UV light like standard tint does!  The ceramic solar guard my buddy uses rejects 99% harmful UV rays along with heat rejection. I can’t recall % of heat rejection off the bat right now. But it’s a high number. 
 

The back windows will register around 27% on a tint meter.  These newer vehicles are lighter than older model ones from the 2000’s.

 

I would suggest putting on at least 50% ceramic tint on back just to get the heat and UV protection for your kids, family members, pets, or any one else you have traveling with you. 
 

Around 10 years ago we tested a Honda Accord in the summer time. Temp was 90ish with high humidity here in Midwest  Inside of vehicle sitting was 132!!!!!!!!

We then put tint on it and set it back outside. And the temp was 30 degree  difference.  It’s unbelievable how much heat the tint rejects. 
 

Here is my truck with 30% ceramic all around and 5% window strip.  Here in Iowa we can only have 70% on front windows but I run a little risky!  Have had 3 tickets in 8 years. Now when I lived and grew up in Nebraska, my SS Trailblazer was 5% all around. 

 

 

A9622839-16E7-4803-8D43-E2967B11E44D.jpeg

7D07EFFD-F802-4288-AF76-85D786A171BF.jpeg

Edited by TNTSilverado
  • Like 1
Posted

In Kansas the legal level for tint on any window is 35%. That does not apply to factory smoked windows, just to any after market sun blocking devices such as window tint or sun screens.

Posted (edited)
On 2/21/2022 at 5:45 PM, TNTSilverado said:

They reject no heat or harmful UV light like standard tint does!  The ceramic solar guard my buddy uses rejects 99% harmful UV rays along with heat rejection. I can’t recall % of heat rejection off the bat right now. But it’s a high number. 

This is .... fake news.  It clearly states that it rejects both UV and visible light🙄

Your buddy probably has one of those demos with a standard, non-treated piece of glass with a light bulb to show how it's worth buying "ceramic" tint.  This glass is tinted, just not with film.  If you couldn't prevent transmission of UV light without film, how would sunglasses work?

 

 

Edited by Rob Mugs
Posted
9 minutes ago, Rob Mugs said:

This is .... fake news.  It clearly states that it rejects both UV and visible light🙄

Your buddy probably has one of those demos with a standard, non-treated piece of glass with a light bulb to show how it's worth buying "ceramic" tint.  This glass is tinted, just not with film.  If you couldn't prevent transmission of UV light without film, how would sunglasses work?

 

 

Ok. Whatever you say.  It’s not tinted my friend. It’s just dyed. 
 

Here is what it states:  Factory tint, officially known as Privacy Glass, is an electrical process called "deep dipping" that involves dying the inside of automotive glass with a dark pigment. Factory tint is standard on the rear half of many new vehicles.

 

 Not fake news. He has done this for 30 years. Went to Las Vegas in 90s and placed 1st in a tint competition. The man knows his $h!t!!!  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...