Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 hours ago, Jason Robins said:

So I have the refreshed sierra 1500, and just had new wheels put on. Discount tire put the new wheels on, and they used the Original TPMS sensors, but they could not get their relearn tool to communicate with the TPMS sensors, but still tried the learn process on the truck (hold down the steering wheel button on the right side while in park, then the horn honks and the left front single lights up waiting for that one to be learned), truck wouldn't learn the first one and honk and advance to the next.

 

So they took the wheels off, and put new TPMS sensors on, some schrader sensors.  They programmed the sensors to the 433 mhz range, tried the learn process on the truck again as explained above, this time, their tool would communicate with the sensor, but the truck wouldn't learn it and advance to the next one.

 

He called some tech support with their learning tool, and they said they can't program the new trucks, and that they are waiting for a software update for their tool in order to program the new trucks.

 

Left there, went to the GM dealer, and their relearn tool wouldn't even communicate with the schrader TPMS sensors that discount tire installed.  He recommended I recontact discount tire, to see if they still have the original sensors and get them back from them, because I may need to rebuy original ones.  Its been a couple days, I doubt they hung on to them, but I have called and they are looking.

 

I'm stuck and at a loss of what to do.  How do I get these dang TPMS sensors to learn to the truck?

 

 

Put the original sensors back in and drive the truck.  They will auto learn.  

Posted (edited)
On 6/28/2022 at 11:38 AM, redwngr said:

I don't know if they will also 'learn with the tool'

I'm definitely curious about that.

 

My read is that the truck will each sensor ID / location each time it is driven after the the 20 or so minutes of stationary time. 

I'd guess someone figures at least 20 minutes is required to rotate tires?

 

I don't have a '22.5 truck to do any trials.

I do have a teach tool that I use when swapping winter / summer tires.  (winter rims are take-offs with GM sensors)

 

If I was to get a 'refreshed' 1500, I would like to be able to continue to run the same winter rims/tires -- without having to change to a newer sensor. 

 

 

 

 

On 6/28/2022 at 8:55 AM, jaxcam02 said:

Interesting. Would it be possible for a TPMS sensor to work through this auto learn even if it doesn't react when using the reset tool? All I know is it would suck to install TPMS sensors and have them not work. That's why I always test with the reset tool before I get them installed. 

 

 

 

I can confirm that the new auto learns will NOT program to a 2019-2022 pre refresh.  The tools will recognize the sensors and if I remember right, they did beep the horn but immediately lost pairing.  We found this out when we got a set of 2021 Tahoe takeoffs to put on a used 2020 Silverado we had.  The Tahoes also use the new auto learn sensors.  

 

The service manual does still show the tool as being an option.  I will have to try it later if I have time.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

Put the original sensors back in and drive the truck.  They will auto learn.  

As I stated, I had the original sensors on, I guess I also should have said, I drove around for a day, it did not relearn anything, I took it back the next day and they changed the sensors to new ones they have.  Clearly those don’t work either.  I did get 3 of the original sensors back from them yesterday, as that is all they could find, so I would need to buy another one.  Not sure what to do at this step, as I am not sure what discount tire will think if I go and ask them to change them back again, especially when it didn’t seem they were working the first time.

Posted
21 hours ago, Jason Robins said:

As I stated, I had the original sensors on, I guess I also should have said, I drove around for a day, it did not relearn anything, I took it back the next day and they changed the sensors to new ones they have.  Clearly those don’t work either.  I did get 3 of the original sensors back from them yesterday, as that is all they could find, so I would need to buy another one.  Not sure what to do at this step, as I am not sure what discount tire will think if I go and ask them to change them back again, especially when it didn’t seem they were working the first time.

 

 

Do your new aftermarket wheels have dual valve stem holes?  Typically many do to mount the sensor on the inside of the wheel and have one just for air on the outside.  

 

I would still get 4 OE sensors.  

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

They do not have dual valve stems.  I ordered a OE tpms sensor, took all of them back to discount and they reinstalled them.  I have the Amazon tpms reset tool, which I tested before they were installed, and it worked.  So then I put the truck in learning, and it did All of them except for the last one, the rear drivers side.  I know they are supposed to auto learn, but auto learning doesn’t appear to work.  Manually resetting them with a tool, and putting the truck in learning mode was working until the last one,  just my luck that one is probably broken or something.  I’m gonna have to take it to GMC and have them try.

  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)

2022.5 refresh Silverado RST 3.0L I was given part number 13542523 sensors new from my dealer. online it shows both these and 13533166 are the same sensor. I just drove 70 miles and they still have not relearned. The truck sat for maybe a hour before i left the shop and for several hours leaving before leaving my parents house.  I do have the summer tires in the bed. could that interfere with the relearn prosses? 

Edited by JCunningham
Posted
7 hours ago, JCunningham said:

2022.5 refresh Silverado RST 3.0L I was given part number 13542523 sensors new from my dealer. online it shows both these and 13533166 are the same sensor. I just drove 70 miles and they still have not relearned. The truck sat for maybe a hour before i left the shop and for several hours leaving before leaving my parents house.  I do have the summer tires in the bed. could that interfere with the relearn prosses? 

Yes, move them away from the truck and then do the relearn.

Posted
11 hours ago, JCunningham said:

2022.5 refresh Silverado RST 3.0L I was given part number 13542523 sensors new from my dealer. online it shows both these and 13533166 are the same sensor. I just drove 70 miles and they still have not relearned. The truck sat for maybe a hour before i left the shop and for several hours leaving before leaving my parents house.  I do have the summer tires in the bed. could that interfere with the relearn prosses? 

 

 

Yes, take them out.  

Posted
14 hours ago, JCunningham said:

2022.5 refresh Silverado RST 3.0L I was given part number 13542523 sensors new from my dealer. online it shows both these and 13533166 are the same sensor. I just drove 70 miles and they still have not relearned. The truck sat for maybe a hour before i left the shop and for several hours leaving before leaving my parents house.  I do have the summer tires in the bed. could that interfere with the relearn prosses? 

If it can still 'see' the ones it last learned it has no reason to try and detect others. 

 

In any case, taking 'em (even temporarily) is an easy test. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...