Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2018 silverado 2wd.  I want to lift it in the very near future purely for looks as my truck will not be going off road.  I am debating on what to do since i have limited options being a 2wd.  I know that zone is always recommended but i was wondering how it compares to mcgaughys lift?  Do they both widen your stance?  I want to run 35's so ill have to lift 6+ inches from my understanding.  My biggest concern is the wheel width / offset.  I personally do not want my wheels sticking way outside of the fenders.  I do like a slightly aggressive stance but i want to avoid going overly wide.  I was looking at a few 22" Hostile wheels and trying to decide on 10" and 12" wide wheels.  Any thoughts and opinions are greatly appreciated!

Posted

We should have more pics of lifted 2wd.

I have a 2017 GMC Sierra, 2WD.  It is currently at Fearless Gear here in Fresno getting rear differential changed to 4.56 and getting universal joint replaced. I could go 35's but I plan to stay at 33. I will post pics when truck gets back, hopefully Friday. I have appointment with Linex at 10 am. 

 

I lifted mine purely based off of looks, never offroad - tbh, I just got tired of the 2500's, etc, sitting taller than me on the road - thats it.

 

In the front, I went with a MaxTrac 5" knuckle lift, Bilstein B8 6100 set at 0" (I didnt want to to go higher than 5), Cognito UPC (not needed but I did it anyway because of the better ball joint). I also had to replace lower control arm because replacing that lower ball joint was a pain and I ending up buying 2 LCA at O'Reilly's.

 

As far as the back, I put 3" rear block..I also have Airlift air bags and I had to buy 4" spacer as well. Also have Hellwig rear sway stabilizer. 

 

The knuckle lift will space out your tires out some, so to some, it will look out of place in comparison to the rears. You can add spacers to rear but i chose not to.

 

You can go mcGaughy's route..I live in Fresno so you will see alot of their trucks around here..I really wanted their front crossmember but that's about it.  I will post pics most likely this Friday. Good luck 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 10/21/2019 at 6:20 PM, Hutch72 said:

After a year of reading this forum got the 6” gen2 Fabtech lift. Thanks everyone for all the info and great pics that got posted.
2015 Silverado 1500

18x9 -12 offset Raceline Defender

Open Range 35x12.5 

 

F6169CA4-434D-434F-A568-406B2C347E90.jpeg

5DFA8503-CECD-4D6C-AC8C-42E2095DCD47.jpeg

52B08778-50F5-46D5-A40B-EC9748187425.jpeg

AD623239-C51E-4FE8-9071-AF187E83AD3F.jpeg

E4846705-7EFE-4EEB-AAFE-A3017847D7BC.jpeg

B9D4AFFF-5F2B-417D-9108-0036148998CE.jpeg

Beautiful truck!  I am considering this lift as well!  How do you like it?  Any negatives worth mentioning?  I am looking at this lift mainly due to the front track width not changing.   

Posted (edited)

Got invited out to the McGaughys compound this weekend. Such a rad time with everyone. Got to tour the shop and they shot a ton of promotional content. Here’s just a little teaser. Also I want to say this, I was extremely happy with my McGaughys system already but now meeting the family behind the company and seeing the state of the art facility I am blown away. Customer satisfaction as far as production, quality control and ease of use is their driving force. I absolutely cannot say enough about this company and I will recommend them 10 out of 10 times to anyone I talk to.

 

Edited by CovetedStyle
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, CovetedStyle said:

Got invited out to the McGaughys compound this weekend. Such a rad time with everyone. Got to tour the shop and they shot a ton of promotional content. Here’s just a little teaser

 

I live literally about 3 miles from that location where that was shot at ?

Posted
11 hours ago, SwisherSweets said:

I live literally about 3 miles from that location where that was shot at ?

No ******!? You’re out there in Fresno huh? It was a cool spot to shoot. We were out there for about three hours shooting the three trucks.

Posted
2 hours ago, CovetedStyle said:

No ******!? You’re out there in Fresno huh? It was a cool spot to shoot. We were out there for about three hours shooting the three trucks.

Yes sir! The direction towards the DMV, not the Tower Disctrict...and btw beautiful trucks!

 

You'd  figure living in Fresno, I would get Mcgaughy system like everybody else, but I can't seeing myself throwing 35's on a 1/2 ton.

 

I'm happy with the 5" lift and 33's

20201007_165922.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, SwisherSweets said:

Yes sir! The direction towards the DMV, not the Tower Disctrict...and btw beautiful trucks!

 

You'd  figure living in Fresno, I would get Mcgaughy system like everybody else, but I can't seeing myself throwing 35's on a 1/2 ton.

 

I'm happy with the 5" lift and 33's

20201007_165922.jpg

To each their own, we all have different types and styles. Great looking truck also! I already knew their equipment was top-of-the-line but now interacting with the actual people behind the company I am thoroughly impressed all around.

Edited by CovetedStyle
  • Like 1
Posted

If I didnt have weight in the back of truck when its fully loaded, I am do down for McGaughy's. When I ever do upgrade to a 2500, actually if it's even possible - a fully customizable flatbed is my dream then I'll look to it.

Currently on my Sierra, even upgraded to a 4.56 gear ratio with locking diff..I'm still on the fence with 35's.

16037477062193299748723770848835.jpg

Posted
On 10/22/2020 at 8:33 AM, vhreso said:

Beautiful truck!  I am considering this lift as well!  How do you like it?  Any negatives worth mentioning?  I am looking at this lift mainly due to the front track width not changing.   

Sorry for the late response. It’s been a year since installing the lift. It doesn’t get mentioned enough or nobody cares  but I’ll tell you turning radius is going be affected. The truck rides better than the 3” wanna be lift I previously had. It still corners great and the les swab tires are surprisingly quiet and amazing in deep snow . I’ve been told the fabtech coil overs for this kit a night and day difference. I’ll tell you the stock front struts do work but it’s only been a year and 16000 miles. I can’t tell you how it tows because I haven’t tried it yet. But no regrets and get lots of compliments.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Just putting this out there for those who don't want to cut out their cross members. I did a Ready Lift 4" SST and changed to Bilstein 5100's. The SST kit comes with upgraded UCA's. Running 295/60R20 (34") 0 offset. I had a inner fender rub but did the Norcal mod with Rough Country fender brackets and now ZERO rubbing.

TruckPic.jpg

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/24/2020 at 1:25 PM, FueledGMC said:

Better now with the BDS 4" lift. Much smoother ride, clicking in my steering has gone away.. And i can turn again! 

Did up my tire size to BFG TA KO2s 305 70s

Also added 1/4" wheel spacers on the front. 

 

20200724_131330.jpg

20200724_131421.jpg

Love the stance and look- how high is the top of your cab?  I have to park in a parking deck and want to go that same route, but cant be higher than 7 feet

Posted
On 5/26/2020 at 9:29 AM, Huntingfool said:

IMG_0879-1.jpg

IMG_0927-1.jpg

IMG_0928-1.jpg

IMG_0929-1.jpg

truck looks great.  I have a Redline as well and pick it up from the lift shop tomorrow.  Did you sell your redline factory rims?  I'm just curious because I have no idea what to sell them for.

Posted

I had 24,000 miles on the truck when I took off the factory wheels and tires. Sold them for $1000

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...